Computer-Based Drill and Practice in Arithmetic: Widening the Gap Between High- and Low-Achieving Students

Precollege schools use their computers predominantly for drill and practice in arithmetic. It has been shown by research to be the most effective application of CAI (Computer-Assisted Instruction). The present study used naturalistic methods to examine differential effectiveness of CAI in arithmetic for high- and low-achieving students. Seven elementary school students with varied backgrounds with regard to socioeconomic status (SES), grade level, type of school, and achievements in arithmetic participated in the study. The study identifies strategies that students use to advance effectively through the levels of the CAI practice with material not yet studied in class. The study also discusses software- and hardware-related errors that students make while working with the CAI system. In many cases, these errors are unrelated to the knowledge of arithmetic. It seems that the low achievers, more than the high achievers, are prone to make these types of errors, which are partly responsible for ineffective CAI work. The study concludes that the higher achieving students observed were much more able than the observed low achievers to adjust to the special environment of computer work and to derive great benefits from it.

[1]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA: A SURVEY* , 1973 .

[2]  W. Spady 5: The Impact of School Resources on Students , 1973 .

[3]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation methods , 1981 .

[4]  E. Guba Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries , 1981 .

[5]  R. Clark Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[6]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  Computers in Schools Today: Some Basic Considerations , 1984, American Journal of Education.

[7]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-Based Education in Secondary Schools. , 1985 .

[8]  Elaine Walker,et al.  The Impact of Computer Assisted Instruction on Mathematics Learning Gains of Elementary & Secondary Students. , 1985 .

[9]  Ronald L. Jacobs,et al.  Computerized Testing: The Hidden Figures Test , 1985 .

[10]  Terry B. Gutkin,et al.  The behavioral sciences in the computer age , 1985 .

[11]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  Effects of Computer-Based Instruction on Secondary School Achievement: A Quantitative Synthesis , 1986 .

[12]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  The Computer as Educator: Lessons From Television Research , 1986 .

[13]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Information Technology and Education: Computer Criticism vs. Technocentric Thinking , 1987 .

[14]  Annette F. Gourgey Coordination of Instruction and Reinforcement as Enhancers of the Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1987 .

[15]  Nira Hativa,et al.  CAI versus paper and pencil-discrepancies in students' performance , 1988 .

[16]  Nira Hativa Sigal's Ineffective Computer-Based Practice of Arithmetic: A Case Study , 1988 .