Analysis of RadLex Coverage and Term Co-occurrence in Radiology Reporting Templates

Radiologists are critically interested in promoting best practices in medical imaging, and to that end, they are actively developing tools that will optimize terminology and reporting practices in radiology. The RadLex® vocabulary, developed by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), is intended to create a unifying source for the terminology that is used to describe medical imaging. The RSNA Reporting Initiative has developed a library of reporting templates to integrate reusable knowledge, or meaning, into the clinical reporting process. This report presents the initial analysis of the intersection of these two major efforts. From 70 published radiology reporting templates, we extracted the names of 6,489 reporting elements. These terms were reviewed in conjunction with the RadLex vocabulary and classified as an exact match, a partial match, or unmatched. Of 2,509 unique terms, 1,017 terms (41%) matched exactly to RadLex terms, 660 (26%) were partial matches, and 832 reporting terms (33%) were unmatched to RadLex. There is significant overlap between the terms used in the structured reporting templates and RadLex. The unmatched terms were analyzed using the multidimensional scaling (MDS) visualization technique to reveal semantic relationships among them. The co-occurrence analysis with the MDS visualization technique provided a semantic overview of the investigated reporting terms and gave a metric to determine the strength of association among these terms.

[1]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Developing a new similarity measure from two different perspectives , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..

[2]  Thomas Schulz,et al.  Indexing Thoracic CT Reports Using a Preliminary Version of a Standardized Radiological Lexicon (RadLex) , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[3]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Creating and Curating a Terminology for Radiology: Ontology Modeling and Analysis , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[4]  Pattanasak Mongkolwat,et al.  Automatic Extraction of Concepts to Extend RadLex , 2011, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[5]  E. Burnside,et al.  Toward best practices in radiology reporting. , 2009, Radiology.

[6]  Andreas Buja,et al.  Visualization Methodology for Multidimensional Scaling , 2002, J. Classif..

[7]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  The cognitive coprocessor architecture for interactive user interfaces , 1989, UIST '89.

[8]  C. Langlotz RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Visualization of health-subject analysis based on query term co-occurrences , 2008 .

[10]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Analysis of query keywords of sports-related queries using visualization and clustering , 2009 .

[11]  Robert R. Korfhage,et al.  Information Storage and Retrieval , 1963 .

[12]  Charles E. Kahn,et al.  Ontology-Assisted Analysis of Web Queries to Determine the Knowledge Radiologists Seek , 2011, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[13]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Visualization for Information Retrieval , 2007, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.