Biology, Methodology or Chance? The Degree Distributions of Bipartite Ecological Networks

The distribution of the number of links per species, or degree distribution, is widely used as a summary of the topology of complex networks. Degree distributions have been studied in a range of ecological networks, including both mutualistic bipartite networks of plants and pollinators or seed dispersers and antagonistic bipartite networks of plants and their consumers. The shape of a degree distribution, for example whether it follows an exponential or power-law form, is typically taken to be indicative of the processes structuring the network. The skewed degree distributions of bipartite mutualistic and antagonistic networks are usually assumed to show that ecological or co-evolutionary processes constrain the relative numbers of specialists and generalists in the network. I show that a simple null model based on the principle of maximum entropy cannot be rejected as a model for the degree distributions in most of the 115 bipartite ecological networks tested here. The model requires knowledge of the number of nodes and links in the network, but needs no other ecological information. The model cannot be rejected for 159 (69%) of the 230 degree distributions of the 115 networks tested. It performed equally well on the plant and animal degree distributions, and cannot be rejected for 81 (70%) of the 115 plant distributions and 78 (68%) of the animal distributions. There are consistent differences between the degree distributions of mutualistic and antagonistic networks, suggesting that different processes are constraining these two classes of networks. Fit to the MaxEnt null model is consistently poor among the largest mutualistic networks. Potential ecological and methodological explanations for deviations from the model suggest that spatial and temporal heterogeneity are important drivers of the structure of these large networks.

[1]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D. Vázquez,et al.  The effect of space in plant–animal mutualistic networks: insights from a simulation study , 2008 .

[3]  Richard J. Williams,et al.  Simple MaxEnt models explain food web degree distributions , 2010, Theoretical Ecology.

[4]  R. J. Pool,et al.  Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 1917 .

[5]  E. Jaynes Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[6]  Theodora Petanidou,et al.  Pollinating Fauna of a Phryganic Ecosystem: Composition and Diversity , 1993 .

[7]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  NULL MODEL ANALYSES OF SPECIALIZATION IN PLANT–POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2003 .

[8]  Jennifer A. Dunne,et al.  The Network Structure of Food Webs , 2005 .

[9]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[10]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  Degree distribution in plant–animal mutualistic networks: forbidden links or random interactions? , 2005 .

[11]  J. E. Cohen,et al.  Food webs and niche space. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[12]  Luciano Cagnolo,et al.  Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. , 2009, Ecology.

[13]  Jennifer A Dunne,et al.  Major dimensions in food-web structure properties. , 2009, Ecology.

[14]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. , 2008, Ecology.

[15]  J. Montoya,et al.  Small world patterns in food webs. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[17]  H. Siegismund,et al.  Structure of a plant-pollinator network on a pahoehoe lava desert of the Galapagos Islands , 2006 .

[18]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[20]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[21]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Generalized Models Reveal Stabilizing Factors in Food Webs , 2009, Science.

[22]  M. Pascual,et al.  Ecological networks : Linking structure to dynamics in food webs , 2006 .

[23]  Luís A. Nunes Amaral,et al.  Evidence for the existence of a robust pattern of prey selection in food webs , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  H. Gleason,et al.  The Structure and Development of the Plant Association , 1917 .

[25]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Patterns of Mutualistic Interactions in Pollination and Seed Dispersal: Connectance, Dependence Asymmetries, and Coevolution , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[26]  J Memmott,et al.  The structure of a plant-pollinator food web. , 1999, Ecology letters.

[27]  V. T. Parker,et al.  Ecological scale : theory and applications , 1999 .

[28]  A G Rossberg,et al.  Some properties of the speciation model for food-web structure-mechanisms for degree distributions and intervality. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  Entropy Maximization and the Spatial Distribution of Species , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[30]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Improving Food Webs , 1993 .

[31]  Robert M May,et al.  Network structure and the biology of populations. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[33]  Do mutualistic networks follow power distributions , 2008 .

[34]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  The Assembly of Species Communities: Chance or Competition? , 1979 .

[35]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[36]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[37]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  Year‐to‐year variation in the topology of a plant–pollinator interaction network , 2008 .

[38]  R. Dewar,et al.  Statistical mechanics unifies different ecological patterns. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  Luis Santamaría,et al.  Linkage Rules for Plant–Pollinator Networks: Trait Complementarity or Exploitation Barriers? , 2007, PLoS biology.

[40]  J. Harte,et al.  Maximum entropy and the state-variable approach to macroecology. , 2008, Ecology.

[41]  Joseph Tzanopoulos,et al.  Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[42]  David Storch,et al.  The quest for a null model for macroecological patterns: geometry of species distributions at multiple spatial scales. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[43]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  ASYMMETRIC SPECIALIZATION: A PERVASIVE FEATURE OF PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2004 .

[44]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Asymmetric specialization and extinction risk in plant–flower visitor webs: a matter of morphology or abundance? , 2007, Oecologia.

[45]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Robust patterns in food web structure. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[46]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[47]  Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen,et al.  A non-growth network model with exponential and 1/k scale-free degree distributions , 2006 .

[48]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[49]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters , 1996 .