Image denoising based on multiscale singularity detection for cone beam CT breast imaging

It was recently reported that the real-time flat panel detector-based cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) breast imaging can help improve the detectability of small breast tumors with an X-ray dose comparable to that of the conventional mammography. In this paper, an efficient denoising algorithm is proposed to further reduce the X-ray exposure level required by a CBCT scan to acquire acceptable image quality. The proposed wavelet-based denoising algorithm possesses three significant characteristics: 1) wavelet coefficients at each scale are classified into two categories: irregular coefficients, and edge-related and regular coefficients; 2) noise in irregular coefficients is reduced as much as possible without producing artifacts to the denoised images; and 3) for the edge-related and regular coefficients, if they are at the first decomposition level, they are further denoised, otherwise, no modifications are made to them so as to obtain good visual quality for diagnosis. By applying the proposed denoising algorithm to the filtered projection images, the X-ray exposure level necessary for the CBCT scan can he reduced by up to 60% while obtaining clinically acceptable image quality. This denoising result indicates that in the clinical application of CBCT breast imaging, the patient radiation dose can be significantly reduced.

[1]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Flat-panel-detector-based cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: phantom and specimen study , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Spatially adaptive wavelet thresholding with context modeling for image denoising , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[4]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Singularity detection and processing with wavelets , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Characterization of Signals from Multiscale Edges , 2011, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  O. Tretiak Noise limitations in X-ray computed tomography. , 1978, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Low-complexity image denoising based on statistical modeling of wavelet coefficients , 1999, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[8]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Principles of computerized tomographic imaging , 2001, Classics in applied mathematics.

[9]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Flat panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT angiography imaging: system evaluation , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Michel M. Ter-Pogossian,et al.  The physical aspects of diagnostic radiology , 1967 .

[11]  K. R. Subramanian,et al.  Efficient wavelet-based image denoising algorithm , 2001 .

[12]  Wan-Chi Siu,et al.  Denoising by singularity detection , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  Alexander A. Sawchuk,et al.  Adaptive Noise Smoothing Filter for Images with Signal-Dependent Noise , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[15]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[16]  E L Nickoloff,et al.  Measurement of the PSF for a CT scanner: appropriate wire diameter and pixel size. , 1988, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  William B. Seaman,et al.  The Physical Aspects of Diagnostic Radiology , 1967 .

[18]  Ioannis Pitas,et al.  Digital Image Processing Algorithms and Applications , 2000 .

[19]  Perry Sprawls,et al.  Physical principles of medical imaging , 1987 .

[20]  E L Nickoloff,et al.  A simplified approach for modulation transfer function determinations in computed tomography. , 1985, Medical physics.

[21]  Scott E. Umbaugh,et al.  Computer Vision and Image Processing: A Practical Approach Using CVIPTools , 1997 .

[22]  D. Donoho,et al.  Translation-Invariant DeNoising , 1995 .