Assessing the Potential for Resilient Performance in Rolling Stock Maintenance: The Pitstop Case

Unexpected failures of physical assets are a primary operational risk to asset-intensive organisations. Managing these unexpected failures is essential for reliable performance. The main railway operator in the Netherlands expects more unexpected failures as a result of the introduction of new rolling stock in an already highly utilised railway system. One of the challenges of maintenance management is to determine if the current corrective maintenance system has the capabilities to cope with an increase of unexpected defects of rolling stock in the upcoming years or that further improvements are required. In the last decade, Resilience Engineering has emerged as a new paradigm in a number of high-risk sectors to detect and respond to unexpected events effectively. Attempts to apply this concept outside these sectors have so far been limited. The main purpose of this study is to explore the applicability of Resilience Engineering in the field of rolling stock maintenance by assessing the potential for resilient performance using an in-depth case study. A comparison between the characteristics of corrective maintenance and emergency healthcare showed that the studied contexts are highly comparable which suggests that the concept of Resilience Engineering may also apply to corrective maintenance of rolling stock. This study contributes to theory by replicating and adapting Resilience Engineering for corrective maintenance of rolling stock and provides maintenance practitioners guidance on how to measure current resilience and identify improvement areas.

[1]  Kathleen M Sutcliffe,et al.  High reliability organizations (HROs). , 2011, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology.

[2]  Kenneth A. Pettersen,et al.  Drift, adaptation, resilience and reliability: Toward an empirical clarification , 2016, Safety Science.

[3]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[4]  Rogier Woltjer,et al.  Resilience in Everyday Operations , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making.

[5]  A. Pilkington,et al.  Operations management themes, concepts and relationships: a forward retrospective of IJOPM , 2006 .

[6]  M. Guy High-Reliability Management , 1990 .

[7]  Markus Schöbel,et al.  Trust in high-reliability organizations , 2009 .

[8]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  How Resilient Is Your Organisation? An Introduction to the Resilience Analysis Grid (RAG) , 2010 .

[9]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Coping with complexity: past, present and future , 2011, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[10]  Balbir S. Dhillon,et al.  Engineering Maintenance: A Modern Approach , 2002 .

[11]  Christopher P. Nemeth,et al.  Building change: Resilience Engineering after ten years , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  P. Checkland Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective a , 2000 .

[13]  K. Weick Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability , 1987 .

[14]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities , 2003 .

[15]  Wieger Willem Tiddens Setting sail towards predictive maintenance : developing tools to conquer difficulties in the implementation of maintenance analytics , 2018 .

[16]  W. Klingenberg,et al.  Typology of condition based maintenance , 2011 .

[17]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[18]  Gesa Praetorius,et al.  Control and Resilience Within the Maritime Traffic Management Domain , 2014 .

[19]  C. W. Gits Design of maintenance concepts , 1992 .

[20]  A. W. Siegel,et al.  Beyond procedures: team reflection in a rail control centre to enhance resilience , 2017 .

[21]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Resilience and resilience engineering in health care. , 2014, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[22]  J. Wacker A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management , 1998 .

[23]  David Woods,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006 .

[24]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Epilogue: Resilience Engineering Precepts , 2006 .

[25]  Tarcisio Abreu Saurin,et al.  A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: Research areas and a research agenda proposal , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  The High Reliability Organization Perspective , 2010 .

[27]  Paul R. Schulman,et al.  The Negotiated Order of Organizational Reliability , 1993 .

[28]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[29]  Riccardo Patriarca,et al.  Resilience Engineering: current status of the research and future challenges , 2018 .

[30]  K. Roberts Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization , 1990 .

[31]  T. L. Porte High Reliability Organizations: Unlikely, Demanding and At Risk , 1996 .

[32]  Leonardus Adriana Maria van Dongen Asset Management: A Maintenance Engineers View , 2015 .

[33]  José Orlando Gomes,et al.  Handoff strategies in settings with high consequences for failure: lessons for health care operations. , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[34]  Leire Labaka,et al.  Resilience framework for critical infrastructures: An empirical study in a nuclear plant , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[35]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Making a meaningful contribution to theory , 2015 .

[36]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  Resilience is not control: healthcare, crisis management, and ICT , 2011, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[37]  E. Hollnagel,et al.  Governance and Control of Financial Systems: A Resilience Engineering Perspective , 2012 .

[38]  S. D. Amundson Relationships between theory-driven empirical research in operations management and other disciplines , 1998 .