Strength of smoke-free air laws and indoor air quality.

INTRODUCTION Smoke-free air laws have been implemented in many Kentucky communities to protect the public from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke exposure. The impact of different strengths of smoke-free air laws on indoor air quality was assessed. METHODS Indoor air quality in hospitality venues was assessed in seven communities before and after comprehensive smoke-free air laws and in two communities only after partial smoke-free air laws. One community was measured three times: before any smoke-free air law, after the initial partial law, and after the law was strengthened to cover all workplaces and public places with few exemptions. Real-time measurements of particulate matters with 2.5 mum aerodynamic diameter or smaller (PM(2.5)) were obtained. RESULTS When comprehensive smoke-free air laws were implemented, indoor PM(2.5) concentrations decreased significantly from 161 to 20 microg/m3. In one community that implemented a comprehensive smoke-free law after initially passing a partial law, indoor PM(2.5) concentrations were 304 microg/m3 before the law, 338 microg/m3 after the partial law, and 9 microg/m3 after the comprehensive law. DISCUSSION The study clearly demonstrated that partial smoke-free air laws do not improve indoor air quality. A significant linear trend indicated that PM(2.5) levels in the establishments decreased with fewer numbers of burning cigarettes. Only comprehensive smoke-free air laws are effective in reducing indoor air pollution from secondhand tobacco smoke.

[1]  James L. Repace,et al.  Respirable Particles and Carcinogens in the Air of Delaware Hospitality Venues Before and After a Smoking Ban , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[2]  Giorgio Cattani,et al.  Exposure to fine and ultrafine particles from secondhand smoke in public places before and after the smoking ban, Italy 2005 , 2007, Tobacco Control.

[3]  James L. Repace,et al.  Indoor Air Quality in Hospitality Venues Before and After Implementation of a Clean Indoor Air Law , 2004 .

[4]  M. Eriksen,et al.  The diffusion and impact of clean indoor air laws. , 2008, Annual review of public health.

[5]  A Hyland,et al.  Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry , 2003, Tobacco control.

[6]  E. Hahn,et al.  Economic effect of a smoke-free law in a tobacco-growing community , 2007, Tobacco Control.

[7]  James L. Repace,et al.  Differential impacts of smoke-free laws on indoor air quality. , 2008, Journal of environmental health.

[8]  Paul Switzer,et al.  Particle Concentrations Inside a Tavern Before and After Prohibition of Smoking: Evaluating the Performance of an Indoor Air Quality Model. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  S. Glantz,et al.  The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants and bars on revenues: a follow-up. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[10]  James L. Repace,et al.  Air pollution in Boston bars before and after a smoking ban , 2006 .

[11]  James L. Repace,et al.  Indoor air quality in hospitality venues before and after implementation of a clean indoor air law--Western New York, 2003. , 2004, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[12]  Esteve Fernandez,et al.  Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Hospitality Venues in Europe , 2008, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[13]  Ellen J Hahn,et al.  Immediate Impact of Smoke-free Laws on Indoor Air Quality , 2007, Southern medical journal.

[14]  Jon G Ayres,et al.  Secondhand smoke levels in Scottish pubs: the effect of smoke-free legislation , 2007, Tobacco Control.

[15]  S. Glantz,et al.  Long term compliance with California’s Smoke-Free Workplace Law among bars and restaurants in Los Angeles County , 2003, Tobacco control.