Divide-and-conquer-based linear-scaling approach for traditional and renormalized coupled cluster methods with single, double, and noniterative triple excitations.

We have reported the divide-and-conquer (DC)-based linear-scaling correlation treatment of coupled-cluster method with single and double excitations (CCSD) [Kobayashi and Nakai, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 044103 (2009)]. In the DC-CCSD method, the CCSD equations derived from subsystem orbitals are solved for each subsystem in order to obtain the total correlation energy by summing up subsystem contributions using energy density analysis. In this study, we extend the DC-CCSD method for treating noniterative perturbative triple excitations using CCSD T(1) and T(2) amplitudes, namely, CCSD(T). In the DC-CCSD(T) method, the so-called (T) corrections are also computed for each subsystem. Numerical assessments indicate that DC-CCSD(T) reproduces the CCSD(T) results with high accuracy and significantly less computational cost. We further extend the DC-based correlation method to renormalized CCSD(T) [Kowalski and Piecuch, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 18 (2000)] for avoiding the divergence that occurs in multireference problems such as bond dissociation.

[1]  Michael A Collins,et al.  Approximate ab initio energies by systematic molecular fragmentation. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[2]  R. Nesbet.  Atomic Bethe‐Goldstone Equations , 2007 .

[3]  Weitao Yang,et al.  A density‐matrix divide‐and‐conquer approach for electronic structure calculations of large molecules , 1995 .

[4]  G. Scuseria,et al.  Scaling reduction of the perturbative triples correction (T) to coupled cluster theory via Laplace transform formalism , 2000 .

[5]  Masato Kobayashi,et al.  Is the divide-and-conquer Hartree–Fock method valid for calculations of delocalized systems? , 2007 .

[6]  T. Crawford,et al.  An Introduction to Coupled Cluster Theory for Computational Chemists , 2007 .

[7]  Hiromi Nakai,et al.  Energy density analysis with Kohn-Sham orbitals , 2002 .

[8]  Karol Kowalski,et al.  Efficient computer implementation of the renormalized coupled-cluster methods: The R-CCSD[T], R-CCSD(T), CR-CCSD[T], and CR-CCSD(T) approaches , 2002 .

[9]  Masato Kobayashi,et al.  Electronic temperature in divide‐and‐conquer electronic structure calculation revisited: Assessment and improvement of self‐consistent field convergence , 2009 .

[10]  Karol Kowalski,et al.  Generating functionals based formulation of the method of moments of coupled cluster equations. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[11]  Karol Kowalski,et al.  Renormalized CCSD(T) and CCSD(TQ) approaches: Dissociation of the N2 triple bond , 2000 .

[12]  P Pulay,et al.  Local Treatment of Electron Correlation , 1993 .

[13]  Masato Kobayashi,et al.  Implementation of divide‐and‐conquer method including Hartree‐Fock exchange interaction , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[14]  V Ganesh,et al.  Molecular tailoring approach for geometry optimization of large molecules: energy evaluation and parallelization strategies. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[15]  P. C. Hariharan,et al.  The influence of polarization functions on molecular orbital hydrogenation energies , 1973 .

[16]  Karol Kowalski,et al.  Extensive generalization of renormalized coupled-cluster methods. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[17]  M. Head‐Gordon,et al.  An accurate local model for triple substitutions in fourth order Møller–Plesset theory and in perturbative corrections to singles and doubles coupled cluster methods , 2000 .

[18]  Michael Dolg,et al.  Implementation and performance of a domain-specific basis set incremental approach for correlation energies: applications to hydrocarbons and a glycine oligomer. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[19]  正人 小林,et al.  分割統治(DC)電子状態計算プログラムのGAMESSへの実装 , 2009 .

[20]  Masato Kobayashi,et al.  Extension of linear-scaling divide-and-conquer-based correlation method to coupled cluster theory with singles and doubles excitations. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Natural linear-scaled coupled-cluster theory with local transferable triple excitations: applications to peptides. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[22]  Martin Schütz,et al.  Low-order scaling local electron correlation methods. V. Connected triples beyond (T): Linear scaling local CCSDT-1b , 2002 .

[23]  Alistair P. Rendell,et al.  COUPLED-CLUSTER THEORY EMPLOYING APPROXIMATE INTEGRALS : AN APPROACH TO AVOID THE INPUT/OUTPUT AND STORAGE BOTTLENECKS , 1994 .

[24]  Wei Li,et al.  An efficient fragment-based approach for predicting the ground-state energies and structures of large molecules. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[25]  Mark S. Gordon,et al.  General atomic and molecular electronic structure system , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[26]  Yang,et al.  Direct calculation of electron density in density-functional theory. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[27]  Martin Schütz,et al.  Low-order scaling local electron correlation methods. III. Linear scaling local perturbative triples correction (T) , 2000 .

[28]  Kazuo Kitaura,et al.  Coupled-cluster theory based upon the fragment molecular-orbital method. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[29]  Michael Dolg,et al.  Fully Automated Incremental Evaluation of MP2 and CCSD(T) Energies: Application to Water Clusters. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[30]  Piotr Piecuch,et al.  Single-reference, size-extensive, non-iterative coupled-cluster approaches to bond breaking and biradicals , 2006 .

[31]  Karol Kowalski,et al.  The method of moments of coupled-cluster equations and the renormalized CCSD[T], CCSD(T), CCSD(TQ), and CCSDT(Q) approaches , 2000 .

[32]  Hans-Joachim Werner,et al.  Local perturbative triples correction (T) with linear cost scaling , 2000 .

[33]  Henrik Koch,et al.  Size-intensive decomposition of orbital energy denominators , 2000 .

[34]  S. J. Cole,et al.  Towards a full CCSDT model for electron correlation , 1985 .

[35]  A. Dutoi,et al.  Accurate local approximations to the triples correlation energy: formulation, implementation and tests of 5th-order scaling models , 2005 .

[36]  M. Head‐Gordon,et al.  A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories , 1989 .

[37]  Masato Kobayashi,et al.  Dual-level hierarchical scheme for linear-scaling divide-and-conquer correlation theory† , 2009 .

[38]  J. Pople,et al.  Self—Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XII. Further Extensions of Gaussian—Type Basis Sets for Use in Molecular Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules , 1972 .

[39]  Masato Kobayashi,et al.  Alternative linear-scaling methodology for the second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation calculation based on the divide-and-conquer method. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[40]  Masato Kobayashi,et al.  Second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation energy obtained from divide-and-conquer Hartree-Fock density matrix. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.