NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL HABITAT MODELS FOR RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT APPLICATION IN CALFORNIA (USA)

In order to test the veracity of currently accepted ideas about Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat associations in the Klamath Province of northern California (USA) we compared different habitat descriptions using predictive habitat-association models. The current description used by federal agencies and new descriptions based on research results and field biologists' best estimates of owl nesting/roosting habitat and foraging habitat were evaluated. For each habitat description, three habitat metrics and three forms of the relationship between owl occupancy and quantities of these habitat metrics were evaluated, each at three spatial scales. Our refined descriptions of owl nesting and roosting, and foraging habitat, were better at predicting owl occupancy than the habitat description currently used by federal land managers. The best-fitting model for predicting owl occupancy was at the 200-ha scale and exhibited a pseudo-threshold relationship to nesting and roosting habitat and a quadratic relationship to foraging habitat. This model correctly classified owl-occupied sites 94% of the time for the developmental data set and between 85% and 92% of the time on four independent test data sets. The current description of owl habitat in northern California ranked among the worst in the collection of models we examined. The testing of multiple models on the four independent data sets was very important for determining the goodness-of-fit and predictive capabilities of the best models. We explored the use of the best-fitting model to predict number of owls on several independent study areas and found a strong correlation between predicted and observed number of owls. The results of this study are beginning to be used to make land-management decisions regarding harvesting and prescribed-burning activities on federal forestlands and were specifically designed to be amenable to adaptive resource management.

[1]  James N. M. Smith,et al.  Morphological Differentiation of Brown-Headed Cowbirds in the Okanagan Valley, British Columbia , 1998 .

[2]  R. J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Summer habitat ecology of Northern Spotted Owls in northwestern California , 1990 .

[3]  M. Morrison,et al.  Development and evaluation of habitat models for herpetofauna and small mammals , 1998 .

[4]  William J. Zielinski,et al.  Using Presence‐Absence Data to Build and Test Spatial Habitat Models for the Fisher in the Klamath Region, U.S.A. , 1999 .

[5]  David R. Anderson,et al.  CLIMATE, HABITAT QUALITY, AND FITNESS IN NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL POPULATIONS IN NORTHWESTERN CALIFORNIA , 2000 .

[6]  N. Sugiura Further analysts of the data by akaike' s information criterion and the finite corrections , 1978 .

[7]  Alan B. Franklin,et al.  Spotted owl roost and nest site selection in northwestern California , 1992 .

[8]  John F. Lehmkuhl,et al.  Habitat pattern around northern spotted owl locations on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington , 1993 .

[9]  L. A. Goodman Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models , 1974 .

[10]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  BAYES AND EMPIRICAL BAYES METHODS FOR DATA ANALYSIS , 1996, Stat. Comput..

[11]  C. J. Zabel,et al.  Influence of primary prey on home-range size and habitat-use patterns of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) , 1995 .

[12]  K. Burnham,et al.  Model selection: An integral part of inference , 1997 .

[13]  R. J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Characteristics of spotted owl habitat in landscapes disturbed by timber harvest in northwestern California , 1998 .

[14]  G. Adler Influence of habitat structure on demography of two rodent species in eastern Massachusetts , 1987 .

[15]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Influence of habitat abundance and fragmentation on northern spotted owls in western Oregon , 1998 .

[16]  William J. Ripple,et al.  OLD-FOREST DISTRIBUTION AROUND SPOTTED OWL NESTS IN THE CENTRAL CASCADE MOUNTAINS, OREGON , 1999 .

[17]  A. Franklin,et al.  Habitat Configuration around Spotted Owl Sites in Northwestern California , 1995 .

[18]  William J. Ripple,et al.  Landscape composition and pattern around northern spotted owl nest sites in southwest Oregon , 1997 .

[19]  B. Noon,et al.  Dusky-footed woodrat abundance in different-aged forests in northwestern California , 1993 .

[20]  B. Noon,et al.  Habitat selection by northern spotted owls : The consequences of prey selection and distribution , 1998 .

[21]  R. Dettmers,et al.  A GIS MODELING METHOD APPLIED TO PREDICTING FOREST SONGBIRD HABITAT , 1999 .

[22]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[23]  Pacific Southwest Forest,et al.  Wildlife 2000: Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates , 1987 .

[24]  B. Biswell,et al.  Northern Spotted Owls: Influence of Prey Base and Landscape Character , 1992 .

[25]  Michael L. Morrison,et al.  Wildlife-habitat relationships , 1992 .

[26]  Jeffrey R Dunk,et al.  Nest-site selection and reproductive success in common ravens , 1997 .

[27]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  The relationship between habitat heterogeneity, space use, and demography in a population of California voles. , 1985 .

[28]  Stephen R. Baillie,et al.  SPATIAL SYNCHRONY IN POPULATIONS OF BIRDS: EFFECTS OF HABITAT, POPULATION TREND, AND SPATIAL SCALE , 2000 .

[29]  L. Brennan,et al.  The Habitat Concept in Ornithology , 1993 .

[30]  A. B. Carey,et al.  Spotted owl home range and habitat use in southern Oregon coast ranges , 1990 .

[31]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .

[32]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[33]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  BAYES AND EMPIRICAL BAYES METHODS FOR DATA ANALYSIS , 1996, Stat. Comput..

[34]  C. J. Zabel,et al.  Forest stand characteristics and reproduction of northern spotted owls in managed North-Coastal California forests , 1999 .

[35]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection strategy in the analysis of capture-recapture data , 1995 .

[36]  B. Noon,et al.  Mitigation of Habitat “Take”: Application to Habitat Conservation Planning , 1997 .

[37]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[38]  F. Thompson,et al.  Reproductive Success of Migratory Birds in Habitat Sources and Sinks , 1995 .

[39]  R. W. Wedderburn Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss-Newton method , 1974 .