Utility of T2-weighted MRI texture analysis in assessment of peripheral zone prostate cancer aggressiveness: a single-arm, multicenter study

[1]  Mohammed R S Sunoqrot,et al.  Automated reference tissue normalization of T2-weighted MR images of the prostate using object recognition , 2020, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[2]  R. Steenbakkers,et al.  The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. , 2020, Radiology.

[3]  D. Margolis,et al.  Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. , 2019, European urology.

[4]  Tapio Pahikkala,et al.  Radiomics and machine learning of multisequence multiparametric prostate MRI: Towards improved non-invasive prostate cancer characterization , 2019, PloS one.

[5]  T. Scheenen,et al.  A Single-Arm, Multicenter Validation Study of Prostate Cancer Localization and Aggressiveness With a Quantitative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Approach , 2019, Investigative radiology.

[6]  David Jaffray,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI-based radiomic features in cervical cancer. , 2019, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Multisite evaluation of radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminability for identifying peripheral zone prostate tumors on MRI , 2019, Journal of medical imaging.

[8]  Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa,et al.  Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. , 2019, European urology.

[9]  P. Lambin,et al.  Stability of radiomics features in apparent diffusion coefficient maps from a multi-centre test-retest trial , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[10]  A. Jena,et al.  Improving Diagnosis of Primary Prostate Cancer With Combined 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-HBED-CC Simultaneous PET and Multiparametric MRI and Clinical Parameters. , 2018, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Tong Chen,et al.  Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic‐Based Model vs. PI‐RADS v2 , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Michael Götz,et al.  Radiomic Machine Learning for Characterization of Prostate Lesions with MRI: Comparison to ADC Values. , 2018, Radiology.

[13]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Introduction The field of Radiomics is concerned with the extraction of quantitative imaging features to convert images into a large scale mineable data , 2022 .

[14]  P. Albers,et al.  Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[15]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  Radiomic features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between the transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary findings from a multi‐institutional study , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Tone F. Bathen,et al.  T2-weighted MRI-derived textural features reflect prostate cancer aggressiveness: preliminary results , 2017, European Radiology.

[17]  Jing Wang,et al.  Machine learning-based analysis of MR radiomics can help to improve the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 in clinically relevant prostate cancer , 2017, European Radiology.

[18]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. , 2017, European urology.

[19]  Oscar Acosta,et al.  Haralick textural features on T2‐weighted MRI are associated with biochemical recurrence following radiotherapy for peripheral zone prostate cancer , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Stefan Leger,et al.  Image biomarker standardisation initiative version 1 . 4 , 2016, 1612.07003.

[21]  Steffen Löck,et al.  Image biomarker standardisation initiative , 2016 .

[22]  George Lee,et al.  Evaluating stability of histomorphometric features across scanner and staining variations: prostate cancer diagnosis from whole slide images , 2016, Journal of medical imaging.

[23]  L. Egevad,et al.  A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score. , 2016, European urology.

[24]  Yohann Tschudi,et al.  Prostate cancer radiomics and the promise of radiogenomics. , 2016, Translational cancer research.

[25]  J. Fütterer,et al.  Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature. , 2015, European urology.

[26]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[27]  Joseph O. Deasy,et al.  Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  T. Scheenen,et al.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Management: Current Status and Future Perspectives , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[29]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging. , 2015, Radiology.

[30]  H. Hricak,et al.  Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI: utility for differentiating non-cancerous prostate from prostate cancer and differentiating prostate cancers with different Gleason scores , 2015, European Radiology.

[31]  M. Stasi,et al.  Texture features on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: new potential biomarkers for prostate cancer aggressiveness , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Samuel K. Park,et al.  Fluoroquinolone resistant rectal colonization predicts risk of infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[33]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. , 2013, European urology.

[34]  Bruce J Trock,et al.  Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades. , 2012, European urology.

[35]  M. Gleave,et al.  Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence , 2011, BJU international.

[36]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. , 2011, Radiology.

[37]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[38]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  F. Cendes,et al.  Texture analysis of medical images. , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[40]  Jason Weston,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.

[41]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  On the Adaptive Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing With Independent Statistics , 2000 .

[42]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[43]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[44]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[45]  D. Gleason,et al.  PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[46]  P. Lambin.  Data from: Radiomics Digital Phantom , 2016 .

[47]  Aixia Guo,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2014 .

[48]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[49]  G. Collewet,et al.  Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[50]  D. Gleason,et al.  Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. 1974. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[51]  W. Youden,et al.  Index for rating diagnostic tests , 1950, Cancer.