Non-weight-bearing neural control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis

Lower limb prostheses have traditionally been mechanically passive devices without electronic control systems. Microprocessor-controlled passive and powered devices have recently received much interest from the clinical and research communities. The control systems for these devices typically use finite-state controllers to interpret data measured from mechanical sensors embedded within the prosthesis. In this paper we investigated a control system that relied on information extracted from myoelectric signals to control a lower limb prosthesis while amputee patients were seated. Sagittal plane motions of the knee and ankle can be accurately (>90%) recognized and controlled in both a virtual environment and on an actuated transfemoral prosthesis using only myoelectric signals measured from nine residual thigh muscles. Patients also demonstrated accurate (~90%) control of both the femoral and tibial rotation degrees of freedom within the virtual environment. A channel subset investigation was completed and the results showed that only five residual thigh muscles are required to achieve accurate control. This research is the first step in our long-term goal of implementing myoelectric control of lower limb prostheses during both weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing activities for individuals with transfemoral amputation.

[1]  D A Winter,et al.  A voluntarily controlled electrohydraulic above-knee prosthesis. , 1975, Bulletin of prosthetics research.

[2]  Max Donath,et al.  Feasibility of an Active Control Scheme for Above Knee Prostheses , 1977 .

[3]  Gordon D. Moskowitz,et al.  Myoelectric Pattern Recognition for Use in the Volitional Control of Above-Knee Prostheses , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  G Van der Perre,et al.  A computer-controlled knee prosthesis: a preliminary report. , 1989, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[5]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Development of EMG-based mode and intent recognition algorithms for a computer-controlled above-knee prosthesis. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[6]  Howard J. Hillstrom,et al.  Robust intent recognition for prosthesis control , 1992, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Development of an above-knee prosthesis equipped with a microcomputer-controlled knee joint: first test results. , 1992, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[8]  Richard A. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[9]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  P. Devita,et al.  A functional knee brace alters joint torque and power patterns during walking and running. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  M. B. Taylor,et al.  A comparison of energy expenditure by a high level trans-femoral amputee using the Intelligent Prosthesis and conventionally damped prosthetic limbs , 1996, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[12]  B I Prilutsky,et al.  Comparison of mechanical energy expenditure of joint moments and muscle forces during human locomotion. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  S. Fukashiro,et al.  Comparison of new approaches to estimate mechanical output of individual joints in vertical jumps. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  R. Riener,et al.  Joint powers in stair climbing at different slopes , 1999, Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference. 1999 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 21st Annual Conference and the 1999 Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society (Cat. N.

[15]  T. Schmalz,et al.  Energy expenditure and biomechanical characteristics of lower limb amputee gait: the influence of prosthetic alignment and different prosthetic components. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[16]  S. Nadeau,et al.  Frontal and sagittal plane analyses of the stair climbing task in healthy adults aged over 40 years: what are the challenges compared to level walking? , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  H. Herr,et al.  A Clinical Comparison of Variable-Damping and Mechanically Passive Prosthetic Knee Devices , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[18]  王人成,et al.  Terrain Identification for Prosthetic Knees Based on Electromyographic Signal Features , 2006 .

[19]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A Comparison of Surface and Intramuscular Myoelectric Signal Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A training strategy to reduce classification degradation due to electrode displacements in pattern recognition based myoelectric control , 2008, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[21]  J. Weber,et al.  Design of an agonist-antagonist active knee prosthesis , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[22]  Matthew A. Holgate,et al.  The SPARKy (Spring Ankle with Regenerative kinetics) project: Choosing a DC motor based actuation method , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[23]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits , 2008, Neural Networks.

[25]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[26]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. , 2009, JAMA.

[27]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  The Effect of ECG Interference on Pattern-Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control for Targeted Muscle Reinnervated Patients , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  He Huang,et al.  A Strategy for Identifying Locomotion Modes Using Surface Electromyography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  A.D.C. Chan,et al.  Examining the adverse effects of limb position on pattern recognition based myoelectric control , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[30]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Multiclass Real-Time Intent Recognition of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[32]  Geovany Araujo Borges,et al.  Myoelectric Knee Angle Estimation Algorithms for Control of Active Transfemoral Leg Prostheses , 2011 .

[33]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Volitional Control of a Prosthetic Knee Using Surface Electromyography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  A. M. Simon,et al.  Real-time myoelectric control of knee and ankle motions for transfemoral amputees. , 2011, JAMA.

[35]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Continuous Locomotion-Mode Identification for Prosthetic Legs Based on Neuromuscular–Mechanical Fusion , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Nathan E. Bunderson,et al.  Quantification of Feature Space Changes With Experience During Electromyogram Pattern Recognition Control , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[37]  A. M. Simon,et al.  Patient Training for Functional Use of Pattern Recognition–Controlled Prostheses , 2012, Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO.

[38]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  Improving Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Robustness to Electrode Shift by Changing Interelectrode Distance and Electrode Configuration , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.