Perceptual Inference Through Global Lexical Similarity

The literature contains a disconnect between accounts of how humans learn lexical semantic representations for words. Theories generally propose that lexical semantics are learned either through perceptual experience or through exposure to regularities in language. We propose here a model to integrate these two information sources. Specifically, the model uses the global structure of memory to exploit the redundancy between language and perception in order to generate inferred perceptual representations for words with which the model has no perceptual experience. We test the model on a variety of different datasets from grounded cognition experiments and demonstrate that this diverse set of results can be explained as perceptual simulation (cf. Barsalou, Simmons, Barbey, & Wilson, 2003) within a global memory model.

[1]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  Brendan T. Johns,et al.  Evaluating the random representation assumption of lexical semantics in cognitive models , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Max M. Louwerse,et al.  Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[4]  M. Louwerse Embodied relations are encoded in language , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. , 2009, Psychological review.

[6]  Andrew Olney,et al.  Distributional Statistics and Thematic Role Relationships , 2007 .

[7]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions , 2006, NeuroImage.

[8]  D. Reisberg The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology , 2013 .

[9]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Gabriel Recchia,et al.  More data trumps smarter algorithms: Comparing pointwise mutual information with latent semantic analysis , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[11]  M. Humphreys,et al.  A context noise model of episodic word recognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[12]  Mirella Lapata,et al.  Composition in Distributional Models of Semantics , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  M. Steyvers Combining Feature Norms and Text Data with Topic Models , 2022 .

[14]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects , 2006, Cognition.

[15]  Max M. Louwerse,et al.  A Taste of Words: Linguistic Context and Perceptual Simulation Predict the Modality of Words , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition , 2008 .

[17]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[18]  P. Kwantes Using context to build semantics , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[20]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[21]  Lori Buchanan,et al.  Grounding co-occurrence: Identifying features in a lexical co-occurrence model of semantic memory , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[22]  William S. Maki,et al.  Semantic distance norms computed from an electronic dictionary (WordNet) , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[23]  D. Schacter,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  D. Schacter,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  W. Schneider,et al.  Perceptual Knowledge Retrieval Activates Sensory Brain Regions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[28]  Dermot Lynott,et al.  Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[29]  Massimo Poesio,et al.  Strudel: A Corpus-Based Semantic Model Based on Properties and Types , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual Processing Affects Conceptual Processing , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  W. Kintsch,et al.  High-Dimensional Semantic Space Accounts of Priming. , 2006 .

[32]  Adam N Sanborn,et al.  Exemplar models as a mechanism for performing Bayesian inference , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  H. Chertkow,et al.  Semantic memory , 2002, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[34]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning , 2000 .

[35]  Michael N. Jones,et al.  Redundancy in Perceptual and Linguistic Experience: Comparing Feature-Based and Distributional Models of Semantic Representation , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[36]  Brent Kievit-Kylar,et al.  The Semantic Pictionary Project , 2011, CogSci.

[37]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  Chung-Ping Cheng,et al.  A mixed-effects expectancy-valence model for the Iowa gambling task , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[39]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[40]  David P Vinson,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[41]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database , 1990 .

[42]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[43]  Gabriel Recchia,et al.  You Can’t Wear a Coat Rack: A Binding Framework to Avoid Illusory Feature Migrations in Perceptually Grounded Semantic Models , 2010 .

[44]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  The limits of co‐occurrence: Tools and theories in language research , 1998 .

[45]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[46]  David W. Conrath,et al.  Semantic Similarity Based on Corpus Statistics and Lexical Taxonomy , 1997, ROCLING/IJCLCLP.