Characteristics of normal newborn transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions: Ear asymmetries and sex effects

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) were recorded from more than 30000 newborns over a six year period. Analysis was performed on all the TEOAEs that passed the bedside universal hearing screen (n=60431), in order to characterize the normal properties of neonatal TEOAEs and to study ear and sex effects. Short recording times (median=33 s) were observed in combination with high entire TEOAE level (median=18.8 dB SPL for an 81.8 dB SPL peak stimulus), and high reproducibility (median=86%). Signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the TEOAE was highly frequency-dependent, being poorer at low frequencies. Prolonged averaging increased median reproducibility to 97%, but the minor S/N-improvement at low frequencies did not justify the longer test time. Highly significant mean lateral asymmetries (right >left) and sex differences (female >male) existed in entire TEOAE level, S/N TEOAE, and in half-octave frequency bands (700–4000 Hz). Mean lateral and sex entire TEOAE level differences were 1.1 dB and 1.3 dB, respectively. Stimulus levels were not affected by ear or sex. Hence, physiological differences at the level of organ of Corti were demonstrated in newborns.

[1]  R. Probst,et al.  Repeatability of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[2]  B. Vohr,et al.  Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions during the Perinatal Period , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[3]  P. Merlob,et al.  Click Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions: Inter-aural and Gender Differences in Newborns , 1997, Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology.

[4]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Hearing Loss in Children and Adults: Audiometric Configuration, Asymmetry, and Progression , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[5]  D T Kemp,et al.  A Guide to the Effective Use of Otoacoustic Emissions , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[6]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[7]  M Don,et al.  Gender differences in cochlear response time: an explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brain-stem response. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  A. C. Davis,et al.  Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in a Representative Population Sample Aged 18 to 25 Years: Emisiones otoacüAsticas evocadas por transitorios en una muestra representativa de población con edades entre 18 y 25 años , 2000, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[9]  J. Loehlin,et al.  Additional findings on heritability and prenatal masculinization of cochlear mechanisms: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions , 1996, Hearing Research.

[10]  B. Cone-Wesson,et al.  Asymmetric Cochlear Processing Mimics Hemispheric Specialization , 2004, Science.

[11]  B. McPherson,et al.  Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in infants: effects of gender, ear asymmetry and activity status. , 1997, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[12]  Mark E. Lutman,et al.  Field Sensitivity of Targeted Neonatal Hearing Screening by Transient‐Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[13]  J. Guinan,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  F. E. Offeciers,et al.  Numerical assessment of TOAE screening results: currently used criteria and their effect on TOAE prevalence figures. , 1996, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  P. Avan,et al.  Characteristics of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOES) in neonates. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[16]  D. McFadden.  A speculation about the parallel ear asymmetries and sex differences in hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions , 1993, Hearing Research.

[17]  D. McFadden,et al.  Changes in otoacoustic emissions in a transsexual male during treatment with estrogen. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  C Elberling,et al.  Estimation of auditory brainstem response, ABR, by means of Bayesian inference. , 1985, Scandinavian audiology.

[19]  L. Heller,et al.  Reliability of Transient‐Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[20]  P Bray,et al.  An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. , 1987, British journal of audiology.

[21]  Christine Yoshinaga-Itano,et al.  Language of Early- and Later-identified Children With Hearing Loss , 1998, Pediatrics.

[22]  D. McFadden,et al.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in heterosexuals, homosexuals, and bisexuals. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J. Kei,et al.  High-frequency (1000 Hz) tympanometry in normal neonates. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[24]  B. Vohr,et al.  Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: Ear-Canal Measurements of Acoustic Admittance and Reflectance in Neonates , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[25]  J. W. Cassidy,et al.  Gender differences among newborns on a transient otoacoustic emissions test for hearing. , 2001, Journal of music therapy.

[26]  D. McCann,et al.  Universal newborn screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment: an 8-year follow-up of a controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[27]  C. Elberling,et al.  Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear. II. Normative data in young adults and influence of posture. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[28]  C. Micheyl,et al.  Evidence of peripheral hearing asymmetry in humans: clinical implications. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[29]  K. Uus,et al.  Changes in 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission detection thresholds in human neonates , 2004 .

[30]  A. Thornton,et al.  The order of testing effect in otoacoustic emissions and its consequences for sex and ear differences in neonates , 2003, Hearing Research.

[31]  C. Elberling,et al.  Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear. IV. Final results in 100 neonates. , 1988, Scandinavian audiology.

[32]  S J Norton,et al.  Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions during the Perinatal Period , 2000, Ear and hearing.