The European Clinical Trials Directive revisited: the VISEAR recommendations.

[1]  J. Bion,et al.  Recommendations in relation to the EU Clinical Trials Directive and Medical Research Involving Incapacitated Adults , 2006, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[2]  C. Blixen,et al.  Stroke patients’ preferences and values about emergency research , 2005, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[3]  A. Maas,et al.  Ethical considerations on consent procedures for emergency research in severe and moderate traumatic brain injury , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[4]  J. Bion,et al.  The European Union Directive on Clinical Research: present status of implementation in EU member states’ legislations with regard to the incompetent patient , 2005, Intensive Care Medicine.

[5]  P. Klepstad,et al.  Further restrictions for ICU research , 2005, Intensive Care Medicine.

[6]  C. Weijer,et al.  When are research risks reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits? , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[7]  J. Saunders,et al.  What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research , 2004, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[8]  Tom P. Aufderheide,et al.  Hyperventilation-Induced Hypotension During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , 2004, Circulation.

[9]  George A Wells,et al.  Optimal defibrillation response intervals for maximum out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  G. Clifton,et al.  Waiver of consent in studies of acute brain injury. , 2002, Journal of neurotrauma.

[11]  P. Steen,et al.  A serious threat to evidence based resuscitation within the European Union. , 2002, Resuscitation.

[12]  J. Herlitz,et al.  Patients' experiences of intervention trials on the treatment of myocardial infarction: is it time to adjust the informed consent procedure to the patient's capacity? , 2001, Heart.