Switched Cooperative Driving Model towards Human Vehicle Copiloting Situation: A Cyberphysical Perspective

Development of highly automated and intelligent vehicles can lead to the reduction of driver workload. However, it also causes the out-of-the-loop problem to drivers, which leaves drivers handicapped in their ability to take over manual operations in emergency situations. This contribution puts forth a new switched driving strategy to avoid some of the negative consequences associated with out-of-the-loop performance by having drivers assume manual control at periodic intervals. To minimize the impact of the transitions between automated and manual driving on traffic operations, a switched cooperative driving model towards human vehicle copiloting situation is proposed by considering the vehicle dynamics and the realistic intervehicle communication in a cyberphysical view. The design method of the switching signal for the switched cooperative driving model is given based on the Lyapunov stability theory with the comprehensive consideration of platoon stability and human factors. The good agreement between simulation results and theoretical analysis illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

[1]  Johan Engström,et al.  Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty , 2005 .

[2]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Mitigating driver distraction with retrospective and concurrent feedback. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Miguel Leitão,et al.  Reaction to a Critical Situation during Driving with Adaptive Cruise Control for Users and Non-Users of the System , 2015 .

[4]  R. Jiang,et al.  Full velocity difference model for a car-following theory. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Javad Taghia,et al.  Evaluation of a transportation system employing autonomous vehicles , 2016 .

[7]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  Improving the Driver–Automation Interaction , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Glenn F. Wilson,et al.  Human-Automation Interaction Research , 2013 .

[9]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Vehicle automation and driving performance , 1998 .

[10]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Preface to the Special Section on Human Factors and Automation in Vehicles , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Kil-To Chong,et al.  A Lyapunov function approach to longitudinal control of vehicles in a platoon , 2000, VTC2000-Spring. 2000 IEEE 51st Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37026).

[12]  Bobbie D. Seppelt,et al.  Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Monica N. Lees,et al.  Driver Distraction and Reliance: Adaptive Cruise Control in the Context of Sensor Reliability and Algorithm Limits , 2017 .

[14]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Out‐of‐the‐loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety , 1997 .

[15]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Tactical Driving Behavior With Different Levels of Automation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[16]  P. Varaiya,et al.  Sketch of an IVHS systems architecture , 1991, Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1991.

[17]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence , 2014 .

[18]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  GENERALIZED FORCE MODEL OF TRAFFIC DYNAMICS , 1998 .

[19]  Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles , 2022 .

[20]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Review of real-time visual driver distraction detection algorithms , 2010, MB '10.

[21]  Hui Liu,et al.  Analysis of traffic flow based on car-following theory: a cyber-physical perspective , 2016 .

[22]  Annika F.L. Larsson,et al.  Learning from experience: familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving , 2014 .

[23]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Meng Wang,et al.  Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. Part I: Mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems , 2014 .

[25]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  A Review and Framework of Control Authority Transitions in Automated Driving , 2015 .

[26]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  The psychology of driving automation: a discussion with Professor Don Norman , 2007 .

[27]  Dihua Sun,et al.  On the stability analysis of microscopic traffic car-following model: a case study , 2013 .

[28]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Transition to manual: driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle , 2014 .

[29]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.