Individual data analysis and Unified Theories of Cognition: A methodological proposal

Unified theories regularly appear in psychology. They also regularly fail to fulfil all of their goals. Newell (1990) called for their revival, using computer modelling as a way to avoid the pitfalls of previous attempts. His call, embodied in the Soar project has so far, however, failed to produce the breakthrough it promised. One of the reasons for the lack of success of Newell’s approach is that the methodology commonly used in psychology, based on controlling potentially confounding variables by using group data, is not the best way forward for developing unified theories of cognition. Instead, we propose an approach where (a) the problems related to group averages are alleviated by analysing subjects individually; (b) there is a close interaction between theory building and experimentation; and (c) computer technology is used to routinely test versions of the theory on a wide range of data. The advantages of this approach heavily outweigh the disadvantages.

[1]  A. Newell.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[2]  Jans Aasman,et al.  Multitasking in Driving , 1992 .

[3]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Goals, Representations, and Strategies in a Concept Attainment Task: the EPAM Model , 1997 .

[4]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[5]  Lowe Bryan William,et al.  Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. , 1899 .

[6]  L. Reder,et al.  The Strategy-Specific Nature of Improvement: The Power Law Applies by Strategy Within Task , 1998 .

[7]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Skill and Working Memory , 1982 .

[8]  Bonnie E. John,et al.  Episodic indexing: a model of memory for attention events , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Soar and the case for unified theories of cognition , 1995, Cognition.

[10]  Allen Newell,et al.  Deduction as verbal reasoning. , 1995 .

[11]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[12]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[13]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Strategies and classification learning , 1981 .

[14]  N. Meyers,et al.  H = W. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Andrew Howes,et al.  Learning consistent, interactive, and meaningful task-action mappings: A computational model , 1996 .

[16]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  Supporting cognitive models as users , 2000, TCHI.

[17]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  Modelling Learning as it Happens in a Diagrammatic Reasoning Task , 1997 .

[18]  Richard M. Young,et al.  Learning Consistent, Interactive, and Meaningful Task-Action Mappings: A Computational Model , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  R. Seibel.  DISCRIMINATION REACTION TIME FOR 1,023-ALTERNATIVE TASK. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Templates in Chess Memory: A Mechanism for Recalling Several Boards , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Approaches to the Study of Intelligence , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[22]  Bonnie E. John,et al.  Episodic Indexing: A Model of Memory for Attention Events , 1999 .

[23]  Richard L. Lewis.  Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[24]  John A. Michon,et al.  Soar: A Cognitive Architecture in Perspective , 1992 .

[25]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  Towards Fair Comparisons of Connectionist Algorithms through Automatically Optimized Parameter Sets , 1991 .

[26]  A. D. D. Groot.  Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .