Older drivers' attitudes about instrument cluster designs in vehicles.

Little is known about older drivers' preferences and attitudes about instrumentation design in vehicles. Yet visual processing impairments are common among older adults and could impact their ability to interface with a vehicle's dashboard. The purpose of this study is to obtain information from them about this topic, using focus groups and content analysis methodology. A trained facilitator led 8 focus groups of older adults. Discussion was stimulated by an outline relevant to dashboard interfaces, audiotaped, and transcribed. Using multi-step content analysis, a trained coder placed comments into thematic categories and coded comments as positive, negative, or neutral in meaning. Comments were coded into these categories: gauges, knobs/switches, interior lighting, color, lettering, symbols, location, entertainment, GPS, cost, uniformity, and getting information. Comments on gauges and knobs/switches represented half the comments. Women made more comments about getting information; men made more comments about uniformity. Positive and negative comments were made in each category; individual differences in preferences were broad. The results of this study will be used to guide the design of a population-based survey of older drivers about instrument cluster format, which will also examine how their responses are related to their visual processing capabilities.

[1]  J. Brabyn,et al.  Seeing into old age: vision function beyond acuity. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  Timothy R. Elliott,et al.  Groups in Behavioral Health and Medical Settings. , 2004 .

[3]  J. F. Sturr,et al.  Psychophysical Evidence for Losses in Rod Sensitivity in the Aging Visual System , 1997, Vision Research.

[4]  Richard A. Krueger.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Second Edition , 1994 .

[5]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Cone- and rod-mediated dark adaptation impairment in age-related maculopathy. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[6]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Perceived barriers to care and attitudes about vision and eye care: focus groups with older African Americans and eye care providers. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Paul Herriotts,et al.  Identification of vehicle design requirements for older drivers. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  Ps Hu.  SUMMARY OF TRAVEL TRENDS: 2001 NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY , 2004 .

[9]  C. Mangione,et al.  Development of the National Eye Institute refractive error correction quality of life questionnaire: focus groups. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[10]  L.P.A. Steenbekkers,et al.  Design-relevant characteristics of ageing users; backgrounds and guidelines for product innovation , 1998 .

[11]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger , 1989 .

[12]  C Owsley,et al.  Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  S. Wild,et al.  Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[14]  M. C. Leske,et al.  The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  V C Smith,et al.  Aging of the human lens. , 1987, Applied optics.

[16]  P. S. Hu,et al.  Summary of Travel Trends , 2004 .

[17]  M. Cotch,et al.  Prevalence of visual impairment in the United States. , 2006, JAMA.

[18]  S. Parker.  Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1970 .

[19]  John A. Brabyn,et al.  Visual Impairments in Elderly People under Everyday Viewing Conditions , 2000 .

[20]  Benita J. O’Colmain,et al.  Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Development of a questionnaire to assess vision problems under low luminance in age-related maculopathy. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  H. Quigley,et al.  Models of open-angle glaucoma prevalence and incidence in the United States. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  C. Owsley.  Aging and vision , 2011, Vision Research.

[24]  P. Jong.  Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. , 2004 .

[25]  J. Alió,et al.  The Aging of the Human Lens , 2008 .

[26]  D. Spain.  SOCIETAL TRENDS: THE AGING BABY BOOM AND WOMEN'S INCREASED INDEPENDENCE , 1999 .

[27]  G S Rubin,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of visual impairment in a population of older Americans. The SEE Study. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  Janice L. DeLucia-Waack,et al.  Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy , 2004 .

[29]  N. Congdon,et al.  Prevalence of cataract and pseudophakia/aphakia among adults in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[30]  Joseph D. Langford,et al.  Focus Groups: Supporting Effective Product Development , 2002 .

[31]  C. Owsley,et al.  Aging, senile miosis and spatial contrast sensitivity at low luminance , 1988, Vision Research.

[32]  Andry Rakotonirainy,et al.  In-vehicle technology functional requirements for older drivers , 2009, AutomotiveUI.

[33]  Neil Charness,et al.  Aging and Human Performance , 2008, Hum. Factors.