Sediment destabilization by animal tubes

periments were performed on isolated individuals, in order to measure approximate spatiallimits of isolated tube effects, and on arrays of individuals at densities reported previously tobe associated with stable beds. The bed was destabilized at all densities of tubes tested, and thisdestabilization was more pronounced at the higher densities. In the field, stable beds persistdespite the frequently destabilizing influence of animal tubes . We suggest that mucous bindingof sediments by animals, diatoms and/or omnipresent bacteria explains this contradiction .I . IntroductionIndividual structures on an otherwise smooth sea bed (isolated roughness el-ements, in hydrodynamic terms) are known to cause local scour by deflecting fluidof relatively high momentum toward the bed. Such scour is seen around singleblades of marine grasses (Neumann et al., 1970; Scoffin, 1970), biogenous moundsand shell fragments (Young and Southard, 1978), and animal tubes (Gage, 1977) .In contrast to the sediment-destablizing effects of isolated roughness elements isthe widely accepted notion that sediments are stabilized by arrays of seagrass bladesand surface-evident tubes constructed by infauna . This notion has developed fromboth field observational studies (Sanders

[1]  J. Southard,et al.  Erosion of fine-grained marine sediments: Sea-floor and laboratory experiments , 1978 .

[2]  J. Gage STRUCTURE OF THE ABYSSAL MACROBENTHIC COMMUNITY IN THE ROCKALL TROUGH , 1977 .

[3]  E. Mills,et al.  A STUDY OF THE INTERTIDAL FAUNA OF BARNSTABLE HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS1 , 1962 .

[4]  A. Holland,et al.  Quantitative evidence concerning the stabilization of sediments by marine benthic diatoms , 1974 .

[5]  I. N. McCave,et al.  Seasonal shifts of sediment within an estuary mediated by algal growth , 1979 .

[6]  D. Rhoads,et al.  SEAFLOOR STABILITY IN CENTRAL LONG ISLAND SOUND: Part II. Biological Interactions And Their Potential Importance for Seafloor Erodibility , 1978 .

[7]  R. Ginsburg,et al.  The Influence of Marine bottom Communities on the Depositional Environment of Sediments , 1958, The Journal of Geology.

[8]  Rupert G. Miller Simultaneous Statistical Inference , 1966 .

[9]  T. P. Scoffin,et al.  The Trapping and Binding of Subtidal Carbonate Sediments by Marine Vegetation in Bimini Lagoon, Bahamas , 1970 .

[10]  Arthur R. M. Nowell,et al.  Turbulent flow in a depth‐limited boundary layer , 1979 .

[11]  D. Rhoads,et al.  Animal-sediment relations in Cape Cod Bay, Massachusetts I. A transect study , 1971 .

[12]  P. S. Klebanoff,et al.  Characteristics of turbulence in a boundary layer with zero pressure gradient , 1955 .

[13]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods , 1973 .

[14]  E W Fager,et al.  Marine Sediments: Effects of a Tube-Building Polychaete , 1964, Science.

[15]  E. Mills The Biology of an Ampeliscid Amphipod Crustacean Sibling Species Pair , 1967 .

[16]  P. Hommeril,et al.  Étude de la fixation des sédiments meubles par deux algues marines: Rhodothamniella floridula (Dillwyn) J. Feldm. et Microcoleus chtonoplastes Thur. , 1965 .

[17]  J. E. Webb Biologically significant properties of submerged marine sands , 1969, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[18]  P. S. Galtsoff The American oyster: Crassostrea virginica Gmelin , 1964 .

[19]  Henry N. Morris A New Concept of Flow in Rough Conduits , 1954 .

[20]  A. R. Nowell,et al.  Effects of Biological Activity on the Entrainment of Marine Sediments , 1981 .

[21]  J. Fisher,et al.  Effects of Tubificid Oligochaetes on Physical and Chemical Properties of Lake Erie Sediments , 1980 .

[22]  C. D. Gebelein Distribution, Morphology, and Accretion Rate of Recent Subtidal Algal Stromatolites, Bermuda , 1969 .