Design and technoeconomic performance analysis of a 1MW solid oxide fuel cell polygeneration system for combined production of heat, hydrogen, and power

Abstract This work focuses on the design and performance estimation of a methane-fueled, 1 MW SOFC combined heat, hydrogen, and power (CHHP) system operating at steady-state. Two methods of hydrogen purification and recovery from the SOFC tail-gas are analyzed: pressure swing adsorption (PSA) and electrochemical hydrogen separation (EHS). The SOFC electrical efficiency at rated power is estimated at 48.8% (LHV) and the overall CHHP efficiency is 85.2% (LHV) for the EHS design concept. The EHS energy requirement of 2.7 kWh kg−1 H2 is found to be about three times lower than PSA in this system. Operating the system to produce additional hydrogen by flowing excess methane into the SOFC subsystem results in increased efficiency for both of the hydrogen separation design concepts. An economic analysis indicates that the expected cost of SOFC-based distributed hydrogen production (4.4 $ kg−1) is on par with other distributed hydrogen production technologies, such as natural gas reforming, electrolysis, and molten carbonate fuel cell CHHP systems. The study illustrates that ‘spark spreads’ (cost of electricity in ¢ kWh−1 minus cost of natural gas in $ MMBtu−1) of five or more offer near-zero or negative hydrogen production costs for distributed SOFC CHHP plants with total installed capital costs near 3950 $ kW.

[1]  C. Eden BookOn systems analysis : David Berlinski 186 pages, £ 10.25 (Cambridge, Mass, and London, MIT Press, 1976)☆ , 1978 .

[2]  J. Jechura,et al.  Biomass to Hydrogen Production Detailed Design and Economics Utilizing the Battelle Columbus Laboratory Indirectly-Heated Gasifier , 2005 .

[3]  R. O’Hayre,et al.  Fuel Cell Fundamentals , 2005 .

[4]  M. K. Mann,et al.  Technical and economic assessment of producing hydrogen by reforming syngas from the Battelle indirectly heated biomass gasifier , 1995 .

[5]  E. Kakaras,et al.  Design and exergetic analysis of a novel carbon free tri-generation system for hydrogen, power and heat production from natural gas, based on combined solid oxide fuel and electrolyser cells , 2010 .

[6]  Nigel M. Sammes,et al.  SOFC mathematic model for systems simulations. Part one: from a micro-detailed to macro-black-box model , 2005 .

[7]  Edel Sheridan,et al.  Electrochemical hydrogen separation and compression using polybenzimidazole (PBI) fuel cell technology , 2010 .

[8]  Roberto Bove,et al.  Analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell system for combined heat and power applications under non-nominal conditions , 2007 .

[9]  Brian C. Benicewicz,et al.  Electrochemical hydrogen pumping using a high-temperature polybenzimidazole (PBI) membrane , 2008 .

[10]  Michael C. Georgiadis,et al.  Hydrogen Purification by Pressure Swing Adsorption , 2007 .

[11]  Jered H. Dean,et al.  System Analysis of Thermochemical-Based Biorefineries for Coproduction of Hydrogen and Electricity , 2011 .

[12]  Fred Mitlitsky,et al.  Low-Cost Co-Production of Hydrogen and Electricity , 2010 .

[13]  K. S. Choi,et al.  A quasi-two-dimensional electrochemistry modeling tool for planar solid oxide fuel cell stacks , 2011 .

[14]  Paola Costamagna,et al.  Electrochemical model of the integrated planar solid oxide fuel cell (IP-SOFC) , 2004 .