A New Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (TOF-AMS)—Instrument Description and First Field Deployment

We report the development and first field deployment of a new version of the Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS), which is capable of measuring non-refractory aerosol mass concentrations, chemically speciated mass distributions and single particle information. The instrument was constructed by interfacing the well-characterized Aerodyne AMS vacuum system, particle focusing, sizing, and evaporation/ionization components, with a compact TOFWERK orthogonal acceleration reflectron time-of-flight mass spectrometer. In this time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (TOF-AMS) aerosol particles are focused by an aerodynamic lens assembly as a narrow beam into the vacuum chamber. Non-refractory particle components flash-vaporize after impaction onto the vaporizer and are ionized by electron impact. The ions are continuously guided into the source region of the time-of-flight mass spectrometer, where ions are extracted into the TOF section at a repetition rate of 83.3 kHz. Each extraction generates a complete mass spectrum, which is processed by a fast (sampling rate 1 Gs/s) data acquisition board and a PC. Particle size information is obtained by chopping the particle beam followed by time-resolved detection of the particle evaporation events. Due to the capability of the time-of-flight mass spectrometer of measuring complete mass spectra for every extraction, complete single particle mass spectra can be collected. This mode provides quantitative information on single particle composition. The TOF-AMS allows a direct measurement of internal and external mixture of non-refractory particle components as well as sensitive ensemble average particle composition and chemically resolved size distribution measurements. Here we describe for the first time the TOF-AMS and its operation as well as results from its first field deployment during the PM 2.5 Technology Assessment and Characterization Study—New York (PMTACS-NY) Winter Intensive in January 2004 in Queens, New York. These results show the capability of the TOF-AMS to measure quantitative aerosol composition and chemically resolved size distributions of the ambient aerosol. In addition it is shown that the single particle information collected with the instrument gives direct information about internal and external mixture of particle components.

[1]  F. Drewnick,et al.  Semicontinuous PM2.5 Sulfate and Nitrate Measurements at an Urban and a Rural Location in New York: PMTACS-NY Summer 2001 and 2002 Campaigns , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  P. Warneck.  Chemistry of the natural atmosphere , 1999 .

[3]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Characterization of urban and rural organic particulate in the Lower Fraser Valley using two Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometers , 2004 .

[4]  D. S. Gross,et al.  Relative sensitivity factors for alkali metal and ammonium cations in single-particle aerosol time-of-flight mass spectra. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  A. Zelenyuk,et al.  Mass Spectrometry of Liquid Aniline Aerosol Particles by IR/UV Laser Irradiation. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  LASER DESORPTION/IONIZATION OF ULTRAFINE AEROSOL PARTICLES , 1997 .

[7]  J. Sarnat,et al.  Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Daniel M. Murphy,et al.  On-line single-particle analysis by laser desorption mass spectrometry , 1991 .

[9]  Douglas R. Worsnop,et al.  Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory , 2004 .

[10]  M. Johnston.  Sampling and analysis of individual particles by aerosol mass spectrometry. , 2000, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[11]  H. Sakurai,et al.  Measurement of condensed-phase reaction kinetics in the aerosol phase using single particle mass spectrometry , 2002 .

[12]  G. Müller,et al.  The Scientific Basis , 1995 .

[13]  F. Drewnick,et al.  Intercomparison and evaluation of four semi-continuous PM2.5 sulfate instruments , 2003 .

[14]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Composition During the PMTACS-NY 2001 Using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. Part I: Mass Concentrations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[15]  Kenneth L. Demerjian,et al.  Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Composition During the PMTACS-NY 2001 Using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. Part II: Chemically Speciated Mass Distributions Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[16]  B. Morrical,et al.  Real-Time Analysis of Individual Atmospheric Aerosol Particles: Design and Performance of a Portable ATOFMS , 1997 .

[17]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory , 2004 .

[18]  Joachim V. R. Heberlein,et al.  Thermal plasma deposition of nanophase hard coatings , 2001 .

[19]  Zhaozhu Ge,et al.  Simultaneous Elemental Composition and Size Distributions of Submicron Particles in Real Time Using Laser Atomization Ionization Mass Spectrometry , 2000 .

[20]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Online mass spectrometric aerosol measurements during the MINOS campaign (Crete, August 2001) , 2003 .

[21]  J. Smith,et al.  Atmospheric Measurements of Sub-20 nm Diameter Particle Chemical Composition by Thermal Desorption Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry , 2004 .

[22]  P. Crutzen,et al.  Atmospheric aerosols: Biogeochemical sources and role in atmospheric chemistry , 1997 .

[23]  D. Murphy,et al.  Chemical composition of single aerosol particles at Idaho Hill: Positive ion measurements , 1997 .

[24]  P. Ziemann,et al.  Compound Identification in Organic Aerosols Using Temperature-Programmed Thermal Desorption Particle Beam Mass Spectrometry , 1999 .

[25]  R. Burnett,et al.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. , 2002, JAMA.

[26]  H H Hill,et al.  Electrospray ionization with ambient pressure ion mobility separation and mass analysis by orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometry. , 2001, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[27]  Hugh Coe,et al.  Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer 1. Techniques of data interpretation and error analysis , 2003 .

[28]  M. Johnston,et al.  Size and composition biases on the detection of individual ultrafine particles by aerosol mass spectrometry , 2000 .

[29]  W G Kreyling,et al.  Daily mortality and fine and ultrafine particles in Erfurt, Germany part I: role of particle number and particle mass. , 2000, Research report.

[30]  Kenneth A. Smith,et al.  Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles , 2000 .

[31]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Generating Particle Beams of Controlled Dimensions and Divergence: I. Theory of Particle Motion in Aerodynamic Lenses and Nozzle Expansions , 1995 .

[32]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  A Numerical Characterization of Particle Beam Collimation by an Aerodynamic Lens-Nozzle System: Part I. An Individual Lens or Nozzle , 2002 .

[33]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Submicron aerosol composition at Trinidad Head, California, during ITCT 2K2: Its relationship with gas phase volatile organic carbon and assessment of instrument performance , 2004 .

[34]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  New particle formation from photooxidation of diiodomethane (CH2I2) , 2003 .

[35]  J. Watson.  Visibility: Science and Regulation , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[36]  J. M. Ramsey,et al.  The Elucidation of Charge-Transfer-Induced Matrix Effects in Environmental Aerosols Via Real-Time Aerosol Mass Spectral Analysis of Individual Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[37]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements , 2000 .

[38]  N. Mohindra,et al.  Scientific basis , 2005, British Dental Journal.

[39]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Ambient aerosol sampling using the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer , 2003 .

[40]  F. Dominici,et al.  Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987-1994. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  J. Jimenez,et al.  A generalised method for the extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer data , 2004 .

[42]  B. Morrical,et al.  Coupling two-step laser desorption/ionization with aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the analysis of individual organic particles , 1998 .

[43]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Time- and size-resolved chemical composition of submicron particles in Pittsburgh: Implications for aerosol sources and processes , 2005 .

[44]  A. Wexler,et al.  Real-Time Monitoring of the Surface and Total Composition of Aerosol Particles , 1997 .

[45]  Michael J. Kleeman,et al.  Particle Detection Efficiencies of Aerosol Time of Flight Mass Spectrometers under Ambient Sampling Conditions , 2000 .

[46]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Insights into the chemistry of new particle formation and growth events in Pittsburgh based on aerosol mass spectrometry. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[47]  Peng Liu,et al.  Generating Particle Beams of Controlled Dimensions and Divergence: II. Experimental Evaluation of Particle Motion in Aerodynamic Lenses and Nozzle Expansions , 1995 .