Life Cycle Cost, Energy and Carbon Assessments of Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway

The Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway (HSR) is one of the most important railways in China, but it also has impacts on the economy and the environment while creating social benefits. This paper uses a life cycle assessment (LCA) method and a life cycle cost (LCC) analysis method to summarize the energy consumption, carbon emissions and costs of the Beijing-Shanghai HSR from the perspective of life cycle, and proposes some corresponding suggestions based on the results. The research objective of this paper is to analyse the carbon emissions, energy consumption, and costs of the rail system which includes the structure of the track and earthwork of the Beijing-Shanghai HSR during four stages: conception stage, construction stage, operation and maintenance stage, and disposal stage. It is concluded that the majority of the carbon emissions and energy consumption of the entire rail system are from the construction stage, accounting for 64.86% and 54.31% respectively. It is followed by the operation and maintenance stage with 31.60% and 35.32% respectively. In contrast, the amount of carbon emissions and energy consumption from the conception stage is too small to be considered. Furthermore, cement is the major contributor to the carbon emissions and energy consumption during the construction stage. As for the cost, the construction stage spends the largest amount of money (US$4614.00 million), followed by the operation and maintenance stage (US$910.61 million). Improving production technologies and choosing construction machinery are proposed to reduce the cost and protect the environment.

[1]  Brenda Chang,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas assessment of infrastructure construction for California’s high-speed rail system , 2011 .

[2]  A. Zoeteman Life cycle cost analysis for managing rail infrastructure , 2001 .

[3]  Veronika Sárik Decision-making model for track system of high-speed rail lines : Ballasted track, ballastless track or both? , 2018 .

[4]  Xiaoyu Yan,et al.  Life cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for road transportation fuels in China , 2009 .

[5]  Joseph M. Sussman,et al.  Grand Challenges in Transportation and Transit Systems , 2016, Front. Built Environ..

[6]  Jonas Åkerman,et al.  The role of high-speed rail in mitigating climate change : The Swedish case Europabanan from a life cycle perspective , 2011 .

[7]  Yang Ji,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Chinese Railway Transportation , 2013 .

[8]  Arjen ZOETEMAN,et al.  Evaluating Track Structures: Life Cycle Cost Analysis as a Structured Approach , 2001 .

[9]  Tao Wang,et al.  Life cycle assessment of High Speed Rail in China , 2015 .

[10]  A. Horvath,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of high-speed rail: the case of California , 2010 .

[11]  Tiago Domingos,et al.  Life cycle assessment of high-speed rail: a case study in Portugal , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Taeyeon Kim,et al.  On-Site Measurements of CO 2 Emissions during the Construction Phase of a Building Complex , 2016 .

[13]  Lynn Price,et al.  Potential Energy Savings and CO2 Emissions Reduction of China's Cement Industry , 2012 .

[14]  Xunmin Ou,et al.  Life Cycle Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis of Natural Gas-Based Distributed Generation Projects in China , 2017 .

[15]  Jianyi Lin,et al.  A Carbon Footprint of High‐Speed Railways in China: A Case Study of the Beijing‐Shanghai Line , 2018, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[16]  Dennis Polhill,et al.  Life Cycle Analysis , 1985 .

[17]  A. Horvath,et al.  Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains , 2009 .

[18]  Henning Schwarz,et al.  Ecology profile of the german high-speed rail passenger transport system, ICE , 2003 .

[19]  Leon Freris,et al.  Renewable energy in power systems , 2008 .