A nationwide causal mediation analysis of survival following ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Objective International studies report a decline in mortality following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The extent to which the observed improvements in STEMI survival are explained by temporal changes in patient characteristics and utilisation of treatments is unknown. Methods Cohort study using national registry data from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project between first January 2004 and 30th June 2013. 232 353 survivors of hospitalisation with STEMI as recorded in 247 hospitals in England and Wales. Flexible parametric survival modelling and causal mediation analysis were used to estimate the relative contribution of temporal changes in treatments and patient characteristics on improved STEMI survival. Results Over the study period, unadjusted survival at 6 months and 1 year improved by 0.9% and 1.0% on average per year (HR: 0.991, 95% CI: 0.988 to 0.994 and HR: 0.990, 95% CI: 0.987 to 0.993, respectively). The uptake of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (HR: 1.025, 95% CI: 1.021 to 1.028) and increased prescription of P2Y12 inhibitors (HR: 1.035, 95% CI: 1.031 to 1.039) were significantly associated with improvements in 1-year survival. Primary PCI explained 16.8% (95% CI: 10.8% to 31.6%) and 13.2% (9.2% to 21.9%) of the temporal survival improvements at 6 months and 1 year, respectively, whereas P2Y12 inhibitor prescription explained 5.3% (3.6% to 8.8%) of the temporal improvements at 6 months but not at 1 year. Conclusions For STEMI in England and Wales, improvements in survival between 2004 and 2013 were significantly explained by the uptake of primary PCI and increased use of P2Y12 inhibitors at 6 months and primary PCI only at 1 year. Trial registration number NCT03749694

[1]  C. Gale,et al.  Cohort profile: The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP). , 2019, European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes.

[2]  S. Cook,et al.  Six months versus 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DAPT-STEMI): randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[3]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  12 months of DAPT after acute coronary syndrome still beats 6 months , 2018, The Lancet.

[4]  Yong Hwan Park,et al.  6-month versus 12-month or longer dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (SMART-DATE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial , 2018, The Lancet.

[5]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[6]  C. Held,et al.  Improved outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction during the last 20 years are related to implementation of evidence-based treatments: experiences from the SWEDEHEART registry 1995–2014 , 2017, European heart journal.

[7]  D. Newby,et al.  Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome , 2017, Heart.

[8]  C. Gale,et al.  Why report outcomes when process measures will suffice? , 2017, European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes.

[9]  M. Rayner,et al.  Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update 2016. , 2016, European heart journal.

[10]  P. Norman,et al.  Patient and hospital determinants of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in England, 2003–2013 , 2016, Heart.

[11]  A. Hall,et al.  Trends in hospital treatments, including revascularisation, following acute myocardial infarction, 2003–2010: a multilevel and relative survival analysis for the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR) , 2013, Heart.

[12]  T. Lash,et al.  Determinants and patterns of utilization of primary percutaneous coronary intervention across 12 European countries: 2003-2008. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[13]  T. Lash,et al.  Persistent geographical disparities in the use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 120 European regions: exploring the variation. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  D. Atar,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation , 2013 .

[15]  J. Ferrières,et al.  Association of changes in clinical characteristics and management with improvement in survival among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2012, JAMA.

[16]  Douglas Weaver,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2012, Circulation.

[17]  Paul C. Lambert,et al.  Flexible Parametric Survival Analysis Using Stata: Beyond the Cox Model , 2011 .

[18]  R. West,et al.  Impact of hospital proportion and volume on primary percutaneous coronary intervention performance in England and Wales. , 2011, European heart journal.

[19]  L. Smeeth,et al.  The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) , 2010, Heart.

[20]  K. Eagle,et al.  Trends in acute reperfusion therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from 1999 to 2006: we are getting better but we have got a long way to go. , 2008, European heart journal.

[21]  K. Eagle,et al.  Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999-2006. , 2007, JAMA.

[22]  Klaus Rasmussen,et al.  A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Ottervanger,et al.  Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.