Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Litovsky,et al. Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners , 2015, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[2] Yoojin Chung,et al. Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.
[3] Volker Hohmann,et al. The effect of overall level on sensitivity to interaural differences of time and level at high frequencies. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] N. Viemeister. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] Ying-Yee Kong,et al. Temporal pitch perception at high rates in cochlear implants. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] B. Moore,et al. Basic Aspects of Hearing , 2013, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.
[7] R. Tyler,et al. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] G Christopher Stecker,et al. Temporal weighting functions for interaural time and level differences. IV. Effects of carrier frequency. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] Torsten Dau,et al. Experimental Evidence for a Cochlear Source of the Precedence Effect , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[10] B C Moore,et al. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] Blake S. Wilson,et al. Engineering Design of Cochlear Implants , 2004 .
[12] T. Dau,et al. Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] D. McFadden,et al. Lateralization of high frequencies based on interaural time differences. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] Leslie R Bernstein,et al. Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli". , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Effects of center frequency and rate on the sensitivity to interaural delay in high-frequency click trains. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] G. Henning. Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] Brian R Glasberg,et al. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.
[18] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] R. Carlyon,et al. Relationships between auditory nerve activity and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. , 2013, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.
[20] Piotr Majdak,et al. Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Mathias Dietz,et al. Emphasis of spatial cues in the temporal fine structure during the rising segments of amplitude-modulated sounds , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[22] Ervin R. Hafter,et al. Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: Spectral effects , 1981 .
[23] Michiel W. H. Remme,et al. Subthreshold resonance properties contribute to the efficient coding of auditory spatial cues , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[24] J. C. Middlebrooks,et al. Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] Leslie R Bernstein,et al. Sensitivity to envelope-based interaural delays at high frequencies: center frequency affects the envelope rate-limitation. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] Jessica J. M. Monaghan,et al. Factors affecting the use of envelope interaural time differences in reverberation. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] Volker Hohmann,et al. Comparing the effect of pause duration on threshold interaural time differences between exponential and squared-sine envelopes (L). , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] W. Baumgartner,et al. Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] R. Carlyon,et al. Limitations on rate discrimination. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Kohlrausch,et al. The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] H. S. Colburn,et al. An auditory‐nerve model for interaural time discrimination of high‐frequency complex stimuli , 1976 .
[32] Robert V Shannon,et al. Training improves cochlear implant rate discrimination on a psychophysical task. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Margaret Barnes-Davies,et al. Kv1 currents mediate a gradient of principal neuron excitability across the tonotopic axis in the rat lateral superior olive , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.
[34] Andrew J Oxenham,et al. Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[35] S van de Par,et al. A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] Leslie R Bernstein,et al. Lateralization produced by envelope-based interaural temporal disparities of high-frequency, raised-sine stimuli: empirical data and modeling. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] Rainer Hartmann,et al. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea , 1984, Hearing Research.
[38] Piotr Majdak,et al. Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[39] Piotr Majdak,et al. Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] C Trahiotis,et al. Detection of interaural delay in high-frequency sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones, two-tone complexes, and bands of noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[41] Colette M McKay,et al. The upper limit of temporal pitch for cochlear-implant listeners: stimulus duration, conditioner pulses, and the number of electrodes stimulated. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] Jing Xia,et al. Isolating mechanisms that influence measures of the precedence effect: theoretical predictions and behavioral tests. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] G. C. Stecker,et al. Temporal weighting functions for interaural time and level differences. II. The effect of binaurally synchronous temporal jitter. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] J. Zwislocki,et al. Just Noticeable Differences in Dichotic Phase , 1956 .
[45] T. Yin,et al. Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] Piotr Majdak,et al. Enhancing sensitivity to interaural time differences at high modulation rates by introducing temporal jitter. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] Richard Van Hoesel. Binaural jitter with cochlear implants, improved interaural time-delay sensitivity, and normal hearing , 2008 .
[48] R. G. Klumpp,et al. Some Measurements of Interaural Time Difference Thresholds , 1956 .
[49] Volker Hohmann,et al. The influence of different segments of the ongoing envelope on sensitivity to interaural time delays. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.