Quantification of the effects of volume conduction on the EEG/MEG connectivity estimates: an index of sensitivity to brain interactions

In the context of EEG/MEG, the term 'volume conduction (VC) effects' refers to the recording of an instantaneous linear mixture of multiple brain source activities by each EEG/MEG channel. VC effects may lead to the detection of spurious functional/effective couplings among EEG/MEG channels that are not caused by brain interactions. It is of importance to determine which detected couplings are indicators of brain interactions and which originate from the VC artefacts. In this paper, a quantitative framework is proposed to explore the origin of detected channel couplings by using two types of surrogate datasets. Also, a sensitivity index (called SI) is proposed to compare the power of different connectivity measures to discriminate between the brain interactions and the instantaneous linear mixing effects. We use seven different functional connectivity estimators to evaluate our method on simulation models and resting state EEG data. The error rate of the proposed framework for simulation data by using each of the connectivity estimators is less than 5.2%. Also, SI ranks these connectivity estimators according to their sensitivity to brain interactions in the presence of VC artefacts. As expected, the connectivity measures which are theoretically robust to VC artefacts yield high SI in simulation models and EEG data. In addition, for EEG data in the alpha frequency band the reproducible functional couplings which are indicators of brain interactions are in the back-front directions. This is consistent with the previous studies in this field.

[1]  Dimitris Kugiumtzis,et al.  Non-uniform state space reconstruction and coupling detection , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  S. Slobounov,et al.  Alteration of Cortical Functional Connectivity as a Result of Traumatic Brain Injury Revealed by Graph Theory, ICA, and sLORETA Analyses of EEG Signals , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  P. Rossini,et al.  Sources of cortical rhythms in adults during physiological aging: A multicentric EEG study , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Luca Faes,et al.  Extended causal modeling to assess Partial Directed Coherence in multiple time series with significant instantaneous interactions , 2010, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Go with the flow: Use of a directed phase lag index (dPLI) to characterize patterns of phase relations in a large-scale model of brain dynamics , 2012, NeuroImage.

[6]  L. Faes,et al.  Information-based detection of nonlinear Granger causality in multivariate processes via a nonuniform embedding technique. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  A. J. Bell,et al.  A Unifying Information-Theoretic Framework for Independent Component Analysis , 2000 .

[8]  R Quian Quiroga,et al.  Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: a case study on electroencephalographic signals. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias , 2011, NeuroImage.

[10]  Andreas Ziehe,et al.  Constructing Surrogate Data to Control for Artifacts of Volume Conduction for Functional Connectivity Measures , 2010 .

[11]  K. Müller,et al.  Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[12]  Guido Nolte,et al.  Estimating true brain connectivity from EEG/MEG data invariant to linear and static transformations in sensor space , 2012, NeuroImage.

[13]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[14]  M. Hallett,et al.  Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Bin He,et al.  Electrophysiological Imaging of Brain Activity and Connectivity—Challenges and Opportunities , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  MEG Connectivity Analysis in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease Using Cross Mutual Information and Spectral Coherence , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Luca Faes,et al.  Mutual nonlinear prediction as a tool to evaluate coupling strength and directionality in bivariate time series: comparison among different strategies based on k nearest neighbors. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  Determination of EEG activity propagation: pair-wise versus multichannel estimate , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Cees van Leeuwen,et al.  Spatial and temporal structure of phase synchronization of spontaneous alpha EEG activity , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  O. Sporns,et al.  Structural Determinants of Functional Brain Dynamics , 2007 .

[22]  M. Zervakis,et al.  Intertrial coherence and causal interaction among independent EEG components , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[24]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Estimate of Causality Between Independent Cortical Spatial Patterns During Movement Volition in Spinal Cord Injured Patients , 2007, Brain Topography.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  Luca Faes,et al.  Multivariate Autoregressive Model with Instantaneous Effects to Improve Brain Connectivity Estimation , 2009 .

[27]  M. Kaminski,et al.  Topographic analysis of coherence and propagation of EEG activity during sleep and wakefulness. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  D. Tucker,et al.  EEG coherency. I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  C. Stam,et al.  Phase lag index: Assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[30]  Larry C. Andrews,et al.  Random Data Analysis , 2012 .

[31]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  Natasa Kovacevic,et al.  Exploring transient transfer entropy based on a group-wise ICA decomposition of EEG data , 2010, NeuroImage.

[33]  Luca Faes,et al.  Testing Frequency-Domain Causality in Multivariate Time Series , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  M Kamiński,et al.  Investigation of coherence structure and EEG activity propagation during sleep. , 1995, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[35]  Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh,et al.  Estimation of direct nonlinear effective connectivity using information theory and multilayer perceptron , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[36]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Directed Cortical Information Flow during Human Object Recognition: Analyzing Induced EEG Gamma-Band Responses in Brain's Source Space , 2007, PloS one.