Electrical bioimpedance cardiography: an old technology with new hopes for the future.

HE POSITIVE IMPACT of early goal-directed hemodynamic therapy on postoperative outcome increasingly has been investigated over the last few years in high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac and cardiac surgeries. 1–4 However, these preemptive strategies require advanced hemodynamic monitoring to assess cardiac output and stroke volume. The classic available tools (intermittent pulmonary arterial or transpulmonary thermodilution or esophageal Doppler), either invasive or operator-dependent and necessitating a learning curve, are not convenient for routine practice. Therefore, they remain insufficiently used among North American and European anesthesiologists. 5 Besides, new mini-invasive cardiac output devices have been developed commercially over the last decade. 6 Less accurate but more convenient and easy to use, they potentially could help the practitioners in promoting advanced hemodynamic monitoring and early goal-directed therapy at the bedside in high-risk patients in an attempt to further improve postoperative outcome. Among these miniinvasive technologies, thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) has major theoretical advantages and could be of great clinical utility in the settings of anesthesiology, cardiology, and perioperative medicine. Despite extensive literature published over the last 50 years, TEB remains scarcely used by practitioners. This review first describes the principles and limitations of the TEB before addressing the crucial problem of its clinical validation. Endotracheal electrical bioimpedance is a new approach in mechanically ventilated patients that could bring a decisive advantage in the coming years and allow a wide dissemination of the method in the operating room and intensive care units (ICUs). This new approach is detailed in the final section. In contrast, the bioreactance technology has been well-described in a recent review 6 and will not be discussed further.

[1]  K. Hansen,et al.  Lack of agreement and trending ability of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor compared with thermodilution , 2012, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[2]  D P Bernstein,et al.  A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: Theory and rationale , 1986, Critical care medicine.

[3]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[4]  R. Patterson,et al.  Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. , 1966, Aerospace medicine.

[5]  W. Culp,et al.  Comparison of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor to thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. , 2010, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[6]  H. Fuller The validity of cardiac output measurement by thoracic impedance: a meta-analysis. , 1992, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[7]  H Belzberg,et al.  Multicenter study of noninvasive monitoring systems as alternatives to invasive monitoring of acutely ill emergency patients. , 1998, Chest.

[8]  A. Wallace,et al.  Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[10]  H. G. Goovaerts,et al.  A meta-analysis of three decades of validating thoracic impedance cardiography. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[11]  B. Koolen,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a new tracheal impedance cardiography method , 2012, Anaesthesia.

[12]  L. Critchley,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Bias and Precision Statistics to Compare Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques , 1999, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[13]  W. Buhre,et al.  Assessment of stroke volumeindex with three different bioimpedance algorithms: lack of agreement compared to thermodilution , 2008, Intensive Care Medicine.

[14]  A. Goetz,et al.  Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions. , 2005, British journal of anaesthesia.

[15]  L. Critchley,et al.  Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. , 2011, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[16]  A. Perel,et al.  Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists , 2011, Critical care.

[17]  D. Altman,et al.  Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual , 2007, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[18]  J. Hanouz,et al.  Can endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography assess hemodynamic response to passive leg raising following cardiac surgery? , 2012, Annals of Intensive Care.

[19]  Srámek Bb Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output. , 1994 .

[20]  A. Goetz,et al.  Individually Optimized Hemodynamic Therapy Reduces Complications and Length of Stay in the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial , 2013, Anesthesiology.

[21]  M. Cecconi,et al.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Use of Preemptive Hemodynamic Intervention to Improve Postoperative Outcomes in Moderate and High-Risk Surgical Patients , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[22]  Vincent Caille,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Index in Healthy Volunteers: A Comparison Between Thoracic Impedance Cardiography and Doppler Echocardiography , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[23]  Timothy M. Maus,et al.  Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor. , 2011, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[24]  K. Tremper,et al.  Thoracic bioimpedance and Doppler cardiac output measurement: learning curve and interobserver reproducibility. , 1989, Critical care medicine.

[25]  A. Ho,et al.  A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[26]  W. S. Sageman,et al.  Reliability and precision of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance monitor in a lower body negative pressure model. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[27]  Philip J Peyton,et al.  Minimally Invasive Measurement of Cardiac Output during Surgery and Critical Care: A Meta-analysis of Accuracy and Precision , 2010, Anesthesiology.

[28]  J. Hanouz,et al.  A comparison of endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. , 2012, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[29]  F. Verhoeff,et al.  Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a study of reproducibility and comparison with thermodilution. , 1991, British journal of anaesthesia.

[30]  K. Ho,et al.  Improving perioperative outcomes: fluid optimization with the esophageal Doppler monitor, a metaanalysis and review. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[31]  M. Cecconi,et al.  Goal-directed therapy in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, British journal of anaesthesia.

[32]  R. Mohr,et al.  Inaccuracy of radial artery pressure measurement after cardiac operations. , 1987, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[33]  P. Marik,et al.  Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review. , 2013, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.