OBJECTIVE
To analyze the effects of patient mix diversity on performance of an intensive care unit (ICU) severity-of-illness model.
DESIGN
Multiple patient populations were created using computer simulations. A customized version of the Mortality Probability Model (MPM) II admission model was used to ascertain probabilities of hospital mortality. Performance of the model was assessed using discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) and calibration (goodness-of-fit testing).
SETTING
Intensive care units.
PATIENTS
Data were collected from 4,224 ICU patients from two Massachusetts hospitals (Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA; University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA) and two New York hospitals (Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY; Ellis Hospital, Schenectady, NY).
INTERVENTIONS
Random samples were taken from a database. The percentage of patients with each model disease characteristic was varied by assigning weights (ranging from 0 to 10) to patients with a disease characteristic. Three simulations were run for each of 15 model variables at each of 16 weights, totaling 720 simulations.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and model fit were assessed in each random sample. Removing patients with a given disease characteristic did not affect discrimination or calibration. Increasing frequency of patients with each disease characteristic above the original frequency caused discrimination and calibration to deteriorate. Model fit was more robust to increases in less frequently occurring patient conditions. From the goodness-of-fit test, a critical percentage for each admission model variable was determined for each disease characteristic, defined as the percentage at which the average p value for the test over the three replications decreased to < .10.
CONCLUSIONS
The concept of critical percentages is potentially clinically important. It might provide an easy first step in checking applicability of a given severity-of-illness model and in defining a general medical-surgical ICU. If the critical percentages are exceeded, as might occur in a highly specialized ICU, the model would not be accurate. Alternative modeling approaches might be to customize the model coefficients to the population for more accurate probabilities or to develop specialized models. The MPM approach remained robust for a large variation in patient mix factors.
[1]
D. Schuster.
Predicting outcome after ICU admission. The art and science of assessing risk.
,
1992,
Chest.
[2]
S Lemeshow,et al.
Mortality probability models for patients in the intensive care unit for 48 or 72 hours: A prospective, multicenter study
,
1994,
Critical care medicine.
[3]
N. Wintfeld,et al.
Analyzing hospital mortality. The consequences of diversity in patient mix.
,
1991,
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
[4]
Elisa T. Lee,et al.
Use of relative operating characteristic analysis in epidemiology. A method for dealing with subjective judgement.
,
1981,
American journal of epidemiology.
[5]
S. Lemeshow,et al.
Mortality Probability Models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients.
,
1993,
JAMA.
[6]
S. Lemeshow,et al.
A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study
,
1993
.
[7]
S Lemeshow,et al.
Factors affecting the performance of the models in the Mortality Probability Model II system and strategies of customization: a simulation study.
,
1996,
Critical care medicine.
[8]
J. Hanley,et al.
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
,
1982,
Radiology.
[9]
W. Knaus,et al.
The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults.
,
1991,
Chest.
[10]
J. Bion,et al.
A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter, multinational study. The European/North American Severity Study Group.
,
1995,
Critical care medicine.