Way-finding during a fire emergency: an experimental study in a virtual environment

The way-finding behaviour and response during a fire emergency in a virtual environment (VE) was experimentally investigated. Forty participants, divided into two groups, were required to find the emergency exit as soon as possible in a virtual hotel building because of a fire escape demand under condition 1 (VE without virtual fire, control group) and condition 2 (VE with virtual fire, treatment group). Compared to the control group, the treatment group induced significantly higher skin conductivity and heart rate, experienced more stress, took longer time to notice the evacuation signs, had quicker visual search and had a longer escape time to find the exit. These results indicated that the treatment condition induced higher physiological and psychological stress, and had influenced the escape behaviour compared to the control group. In practice, fire evacuation education and fire evacuation system design should consider the response characteristics in a fire emergency. Practitioner Summary: This article studied people's way-finding behaviour and response during a fire emergency in a virtual environment. People in fire emergency experienced higher physiological and psychological stress, had different perception style, accordingly had different behaviour patterns and poorer way-finding performance, as compared with people in normal condition.

[1]  Bauke de Vries,et al.  Building safety and human behaviour in fire : a literature review , 2010 .

[2]  R L Paulsen,et al.  Human behavior and fires: An introduction , 1984, Fire technology.

[3]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  An aircraft accident database of human experience in evacuation derived from aviation accident reports , 1999 .

[4]  F.X. Meng,et al.  Development of Panorama Manifestation System and Its Comparison with Desk-Top System , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Virtual Reality and Visualization.

[5]  Eric W. Marchant,et al.  A computer model for the evacuation of large building populations , 1995 .

[6]  L Gamberini,et al.  Responding to a fire emergency in a virtual environment: different patterns of action for different situations. , 2003, Ergonomics.

[7]  Alessandro O. Caffò,et al.  Assessing human reorientation ability inside virtual reality environments: the effects of retention interval and landmark characteristics , 2008, Cognitive Processing.

[8]  Ching-Yuan Lin,et al.  A virtual-reality-based feasibility study of evacuation time compared to the traditional calculation method , 2000 .

[9]  Karen Boyce,et al.  A study of evacuation from large retail stores , 2000 .

[10]  Thiago Tinoco Pires,et al.  An approach for modeling human cognitive behavior in evacuation models , 2005 .

[11]  Agnieszka Bojko,et al.  Informative or Misleading? Heatmaps Deconstructed , 2009, HCI.

[12]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Cognitive Maps and Urban Form , 1982 .

[13]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities , 2004 .

[14]  Guylène Proulx Evacuation time and movement in apartment buildings , 1995 .

[15]  L T Buckman,et al.  MODELLING STATION CONGESTION THE PEDROUTE WAY. , 1994 .

[16]  Siuming Lo,et al.  An evacuation model: the SGEM package , 2004 .

[17]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  Evacuation experiment in a road tunnel: A study of human behaviour and technical installations , 2009 .

[18]  Adrian Staub,et al.  The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  R. Block Prospective and Retrospective Duration Judgment: The Role of Information Processing and Memory , 1992 .

[20]  M. Gluck Making Sense of Human Wayfinding: Review of Cognitive and Linguistic Knowledge for Personal Navigation with a New Research Direction , 1991 .

[21]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Information input overload and psychopathology. , 1960, The American journal of psychiatry.

[22]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  A review of the methodologies used in the computer simulation of evacuation from the built environment , 1999 .

[23]  Michael O'Neill,et al.  Evaluation of a Conceptual Model of Architectural Legibility , 1991 .

[24]  Shamus P. Smith,et al.  Rapid prototyping a virtual fire drill environment using computer game technology , 2009 .

[25]  Daniel Mestre,et al.  Affective, anxiety and behavioral effects of an aversive stimulation during a simulated navigation task within a virtual environment: A pilot study , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  A computer-based simulation model for the prediction of evacuation from mass-transport vehicles , 1994 .

[27]  David Crundall,et al.  Effects of experience and processing demands on visual information acquisition in drivers , 1998 .

[28]  Wei Zhang,et al.  The development of a panorama manifestation virtual reality system for navigation and a usability comparison with a desktop system , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[29]  P. A. Hancock *,et al.  On time distortion under stress , 2005 .

[30]  Filiz Ozel,et al.  Time pressure and stress as a factor during emergency egress , 2001 .

[31]  Richard L. Francis,et al.  EVACNET+: A computer program to determine optimal building evacuation plans , 1985 .

[32]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  The EXODUS evacuation model applied to building evacuation scenarios , 1996 .

[33]  Roy A. Ruddle,et al.  Three Levels of Metric for Evaluating Wayfinding , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[34]  Gillian May Wilson Psychophysiological indicators of the impact of media quality on users , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[35]  Luciano Gamberini,et al.  Exploring the Suitability of Virtual Environments for Safety Training: Signals, Norms and Ambiguity in a Simulated Emergency Escape , 2001, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[36]  Liang Zou,et al.  Application Of Virtual Reality Technology To Evacuation Simulation In Fire Disaster , 2006, CGVR.

[37]  Hua Wang,et al.  Communicating emotions in online chat using physiological sensors and animated text , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[38]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  A comparison between actual and predicted evacuation times , 2001 .

[40]  Håkan Frantzich,et al.  Fire alarm in a public building : how do people evaluate information and choose evacuation exit? , 1999 .

[41]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[42]  Michael O'Neill Effects of familiarity and plan complexity on wayfinding in simulated buildings , 1992 .

[43]  J. Sime Movement toward the Familiar , 1985 .

[44]  A. Nyssen,et al.  Influence of 2D and 3D view on performance and time estimation in minimal invasive surgery , 2009, Ergonomics.

[45]  Shana Smith,et al.  Using immersive game-based virtual reality to teach fire-safety skills to children , 2009, Virtual Reality.

[46]  Richard A. Block,et al.  Cognitive models of psychological time , 1992 .

[47]  C. Lawton,et al.  Gender Differences in Wayfinding Strategies and Anxiety About Wayfinding: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2002 .

[48]  R. Golledge Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes , 2010 .

[49]  William J. Wiehagen,et al.  Decision making during a simulated mine fire escape , 1998 .

[50]  Chieh-Hsin Tang,et al.  Using virtual reality to determine how emergency signs facilitate way-finding. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[51]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[52]  Richard A. Bwck Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review , 1997 .

[53]  Aga Skorupka,et al.  Comparing Human Wayfinding Behavior in Real and Virtual Environment , 2009 .

[54]  Helmut T. Zwahlen,et al.  Eye scanning rules for drivers: how do they compare with actual observed eye scanning behavior? , 1991 .

[55]  Samuel Kaski,et al.  Implicit Relevance Feedback from Eye Movements , 2005, ICANN.