Conventional fluorescence microscopy below the diffraction limit with simultaneous capture of two fluorophores in DNA origami

A conventional fluorescence microscope was previously constructed for simultaneous imaging of two colors to gain sub-diffraction localization. The system is predicated on color separation of overlapping Airy discs, construction of matrices of Cartesian coordinates to determine locations as well as centers of the point spread functions of fluorophores. Quantum dots that are separated by as little as 10 nm were resolved in the x-y coordinates. Inter-fluorophore distances that vary by 10 nm could also be distinguished. Quantum dots are bright point light source emitters that excite with a single laser and can serve as a label for many biomolecules. Here, alterations in the method are described to test the ability to resolve Atto 488 and Atto 647 dyes attached to DNA origami at ~40 nm spacing intervals. Dual laser excitation is used in tandem with multi-wavelength bandpass filters. Notwithstanding challenges from reduced intensity in Atto labeled DNA origami helical bundles compared to quantum dots, preliminary data show a mean inter-fluorophore distance of 56 nm with a range (14-148 nm). The range closely matches published results with DNA origami with other methods of subdiffraction microscopy. Sub-diffraction simultaneous two-color imaging fluorescence microscopy acronymically christened (SSTIFM) is a simple, readily accessible, technique for measurement of inter-fluorophore distances in compartments less than 40 nm. Preliminary results with so called nanorulers are encouraging for use with other biomolecules.

[1]  B. Glasgow,et al.  Simultaneous two color image capture for sub-diffraction localization fluorescence microscopy. , 2016, Micron.

[2]  David A. Agard,et al.  Three-dimensional architecture of a polytene nucleus , 1983, Nature.

[3]  Johannes B. Woehrstein,et al.  Multiplexed 3D Cellular Super-Resolution Imaging with DNA-PAINT and Exchange-PAINT , 2014, Nature Methods.

[4]  Eran Zahavy,et al.  Nano-Biotechnology for Biomedical and Diagnostic Research , 2012, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[5]  S. Nie,et al.  Quantum dot bioconjugates for ultrasensitive nonisotopic detection. , 1998, Science.

[6]  B. Glasgow Tissue expression of lipocalins in human lacrimal and von Ebner's glands: colocalization with lysozyme , 1995, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[7]  C Cremer,et al.  Considerations on a laser-scanning-microscope with high resolution and depth of field. , 1978, Microscopica acta.

[8]  G. Ulrich Nienhaus,et al.  Biocompatible Surfaces for Specific Tethering of Individual Protein Molecules , 2004 .

[9]  Ying Wang,et al.  A user-friendly two-color super-resolution localization microscope. , 2015, Optics express.

[10]  Johnny Tam,et al.  A Microfluidic Platform for Correlative Live-Cell and Super-Resolution Microscopy , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  Michael W. Davidson,et al.  Dual-color superresolution imaging of genetically expressed probes within individual adhesion complexes , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Michael D. Mason,et al.  Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Zhifeng Shao,et al.  Mercury arc lamp based super-resolution imaging with conventional fluorescence microscopes. , 2014, Micron.

[14]  T. D. Harris,et al.  Breaking the Diffraction Barrier: Optical Microscopy on a Nanometric Scale , 1991, Science.

[15]  Mark Bates,et al.  Multicolor Super-Resolution Imaging with Photo-Switchable Fluorescent Probes , 2007, Science.

[16]  F. Simmel,et al.  Assembly and microscopic characterization of DNA origami structures. , 2012, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[17]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[18]  S. Hell,et al.  Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. , 1994, Optics letters.

[19]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[20]  J. Jester,et al.  A Novel Immunofluorescent Computed Tomography (ICT) Method to Localise and Quantify Multiple Antigens in Large Tissue Volumes at High Resolution , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  P. Tinnefeld,et al.  DNA origami–based standards for quantitative fluorescence microscopy , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[22]  D. Axelrod Cell-substrate contacts illuminated by total internal reflection fluorescence , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  Daniel L. Farkas,et al.  Enhancement of axial resolution in fluorescence microscopy by standing-wave excitation , 1993, Nature.

[24]  H. Leonhardt,et al.  A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  M. Heilemann 2.4 Super-Resolution Microscopy , 2012 .

[26]  A. Rich,et al.  Direct immunofluorescence of oral mucosal biopsies: a comparison of fresh-frozen tissue and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. , 1992, Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology.