Of Dolls and Men

Sex and intimate technologies are important in people’s everyday lives. A class of technologies that is becoming increasingly more prominent in discussions of the future are sex robots. In this article, we present a qualitative analysis of posts from a forum where people describe their interactions with sex dolls and their motivations for using them through text and photographs. Forum users use dolls as a content authoring interface, imbue them with agency, and construct meaningful sexual relationships with them. Implications for the design of future robots and autonomous agents in humans’ everyday lives are discussed. We highlight that sex dolls are used for more than just sex; they provide fertile ground for embodied fictions and care of the self. Future, customizable technologies for sexual intimacy and wellness should account for this use.

[1]  Zabet Patterson,et al.  Going On-line: Consuming Pornography in the Digital Era , 2020, Porn Studies.

[2]  Peter Alilunas.  Far away, so close: technology, spectatorship, and the pasts and futures of pornography studies , 2019 .

[3]  Madeline L. Zehnder.  Companion , 2019, New Literary History.

[4]  Deborah A. Christel,et al.  Average American women’s clothing size: comparing National Health and Nutritional Examination Surveys (1988–2010) to ASTM International Misses & Women’s Plus Size clothing , 2017 .

[5]  Gavin Wood,et al.  "They're Just Tixel Pits, Man": Disputing the 'Reality' of Virtual Reality Pornography through the Story Completion Method , 2017, CHI.

[6]  Jamie E. Bloss.  The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies , 2017 .

[7]  EunJeong Cheon,et al.  Configuring the User: "Robots have Needs Too" , 2017, CSCW.

[8]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Not Only the Lonely—How Men Explicitly and Implicitly Evaluate the Attractiveness of Sex Robots in Comparison to the Attractiveness of Women, and Personal Characteristics Influencing This Evaluation , 2017 .

[9]  Lynne E. Hall.  Sex with Robots for Love Free Encounters , 2016, LSR.

[10]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  Robots have needs too , 2016 .

[11]  K. Flegal,et al.  Anthropometric Reference Data for Children and Adults: United States, 2011-2014. , 2016, Vital and health statistics. Series 3, Analytical studies.

[12]  Kathleen Richardson,et al.  Sex Robot Matters: Slavery, the Prostituted, and the Rights of Machines , 2016, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[13]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Rethinking the Design of Robotic Pets for Older Adults , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[14]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Somaesthetic Appreciation Design , 2016, CHI.

[15]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Anti-Solutionist Strategies: Seriously Silly Design Fiction , 2016, CHI.

[16]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Are we ready for sex robots? , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[17]  Ruth Horn,et al.  Making space for empathy: supporting doctors in the emotional labour of clinical care , 2016, BMC medical ethics.

[18]  Kathleen Richardson,et al.  The asymmetrical 'relationship' , 2016, SIGCAS Comput. Soc..

[19]  Gavin Wood,et al.  Talk About Sex: Designing Games to Facilitate Healthy Discussions around Sex , 2015, CHI PLAY.

[20]  Irina Shklovski,et al.  Let's Talk About Sex (Apps), CSCW , 2015, CSCW Companion.

[21]  Norman Makoto Su,et al.  Mundanely miraculous: the robot in healthcare , 2014, NordiCHI.

[22]  Joseph Lindley,et al.  Anticipatory Ethnography: Design Fiction as an Input to Design Ethnography , 2014 .

[23]  Stephanie Tom Tong,et al.  Breaking boundaries: the uses & gratifications of grindr , 2014, UbiComp.

[24]  Jed R. Brubaker,et al.  DDFSeeks same: sexual health-related language in online personal ads for men who have sex with men , 2014, CHI.

[25]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  The lonely raccoon at the ball: designing for intimacy, sociability, and selfhood , 2014, CHI.

[26]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Spatial and Other Social Engagement Cues in a Child-Robot Interaction: Effects of a Sidekick , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[27]  Marquard Smith.  The Erotic Doll: A Modern Fetish , 2014 .

[28]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  Looking past yesterday's tomorrow: using futures studies methods to extend the research horizon , 2013, CHI.

[29]  Julie Carpenter.  Just Doesn’t Look Right: Exploring the Impact of Humanoid Robot Integration into Explosive Ordnance Disposal Teams , 2013 .

[30]  Kristina Andersen,et al.  Making Magic Machines , 2013 .

[31]  Shuichi Nishio,et al.  Recognizing affection for a touch-based interaction with a humanoid robot , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[32]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Designing (for) desire: a critical study of technosexuality in HCI , 2012, NordiCHI.

[33]  C. Ogden,et al.  Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2007-2010. , 2012, Vital and health statistics. Series 11, Data from the National Health Survey.

[34]  M. Monto,et al.  The Hobbyist and the Girlfriend Experience: Behaviors and Preferences of Male Customers of Internet Sexual Service Providers , 2012 .

[35]  H. Randell-Moon.  “I'm Nobody” , 2012 .

[36]  Janet Vertesi,et al.  Design for X?: distribution choices and ethical design , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[37]  Ian Yeoman,et al.  Robots, men and sex tourism , 2012 .

[38]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Towards a computational method of scaling a robot's behavior via proxemics , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[39]  Ismaila B. Tijani,et al.  Ethical and Legal Implications of Sex Robot: An Islamic Perspective , 2012 .

[40]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  Hospital robot at work: something alien or an intelligent colleague? , 2012, CSCW.

[41]  Sarah Hatheway Valverde.  THE MODERN SEX DOLL-OWNER: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS , 2012 .

[42]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[43]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Pleasure is your birthright: digitally enabled designer sex toys as a case of third-wave HCI , 2011, CHI.

[44]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI , 2011, CHI.

[45]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Sex toys and designing for sexual wellness , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[46]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  How HCI talks about sexuality: discursive strategies, blind spots, and opportunities for future research , 2011, CHI.

[47]  Stella Boess,et al.  Robot Vacuum Cleaner Personality and Behavior , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[48]  George A. Bekey,et al.  Robot ethics: Mapping the issues for a mechanized world , 2011, Artif. Intell..

[49]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  (Whose) value-sensitive design: a study of long- distance relationships in an Arabic cultural context , 2011, CSCW.

[50]  John P. Sullins.  Love and Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-robot Relationships , 2010 .

[51]  Sara Ljungblad,et al.  How do you play with a robotic toy animal?: a long-term study of Pleo , 2010, IDC.

[52]  J. Robertson.  Gendering Humanoid Robots: Robo-Sexism in Japan , 2010 .

[53]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[54]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Receptionist or information kiosk: how do people talk with a robot? , 2010, CSCW '10.

[55]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[56]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[57]  Anna C.B. Russell.  Blurring the love lines: The legal implications of intimacy with machines , 2009, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[58]  Rachel Maines,et al.  Love + Sex With Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships (Levy, D.; 2007) [Book Review] , 2008, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[59]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  The Experience of Embodied Space in Virtual Worlds , 2008 .

[60]  Shaowen Bardzell.  ENCHANTED ARTIFACTS: SOCIAL PRODUCTIVITY AND IDENTITY IN VIRTUAL MATERIAL ECOLOGIES , 2008 .

[61]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Empathy and experience in HCI , 2008, CHI.

[62]  Rosalind Gill,et al.  Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising , 2008 .

[63]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Docile avatars: aesthetics, experience, and sexual interaction in Second Life , 2007, BCS HCI.

[64]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[65]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Back to the shed: gendered visions of technology and domesticity , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[66]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Historical Analysis: Using the Past to Design the Future , 2006, UbiComp.

[67]  Joseph Kaye,et al.  Sexual interactions: why we should talk about sex in HCI , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[68]  T. Siebers,et al.  Disability in Theory , 2006 .

[69]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[70]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies , 2005, TCHI.

[71]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships , 2005, TCHI.

[72]  Mark Jones,et al.  Human computer (sexual) interactions , 2004, INTR.

[73]  Joseph Kaye,et al.  Intimate objects , 2004, DIS '04.

[74]  A. Bruckman.  Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet , 2002, Ethics and Information Technology.

[75]  Katy Bennett,et al.  Visual methodologies. An Introduction to the Interpretation of visual materials. Doi: 10.5212/Rlagg.v.3.i2.178180 , 2012 .

[76]  John C. McCarthy,et al.  Technology as experience , 2004, INTR.

[77]  M. Jørgensen,et al.  Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method , 2002 .

[78]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. , 1996 .

[79]  D. Singh,et al.  Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[80]  J. Butler.  Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity , 1990 .

[81]  Ghislaine M. Lawrence.  The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology , 1989, Medical History.

[82]  L. Williams.  Hard Core: Power, Pleasure, and the "Frenzy of the Visible" , 1989 .

[83]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[84]  Iris Marion Young,et al.  Throwing like a girl: A phenomenology of feminine body comportment motility and spatiality , 1980 .

[85]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Phenomenology of perception. , 1978, Science.

[86]  R. Bellour.  Le blocage symbolique , 1975 .

[87]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[88]  H. Lief.  Training for 'detached concern' in medical students , 1963 .