Can pandemics transform scientific novelty? Evidence from COVID-19

Scientific novelty is important during the pandemic due to its critical role in generating new vaccines. Parachuting collaboration and international collaboration are two crucial channels to expand teams' search activities for a broader scope of resources required to address the global challenge. Our analysis of 58,728 coronavirus papers suggests that scientific novelty measured by the BioBERT model that is pre-trained on 29 million PubMed articles, and parachuting collaboration dramatically increased after the outbreak of COVID-19, while international collaboration witnessed a sudden decrease. During the COVID-19, papers with more parachuting collaboration and internationally collaborative papers are predicted to be more novel. The findings suggest the necessity of reaching out for distant resources, and the importance of maintaining a collaborative scientific community beyond established networks and nationalism during a pandemic.

[1]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , 2013, ICLR.

[2]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  CORD-19: The Covid-19 Open Research Dataset , 2020, NLPCOVID19.

[3]  Sen Chai,et al.  Breakthrough recognition: Bias against novelty and competition for attention , 2019, Research Policy.

[4]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[5]  Robert Leaman,et al.  PubTator central: automated concept annotation for biomedical full text articles , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  J Briere,et al.  Prevalence, Characteristics, and Long-Term Sequelae of Natural Disaster Exposure in the General Population , 2000, Journal of traumatic stress.

[7]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[8]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  CODA-19: Using a Non-Expert Crowd to Annotate Research Aspects on 10,000+ Abstracts in the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset , 2020, NLPCOVID19.

[9]  D. Almond,et al.  Did COVID-19 Improve Air Quality Near Hubei? , 2020 .

[10]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[11]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Martin L. Weitzman,et al.  Hybridizing Growth Theory , 1996 .

[13]  Min Song,et al.  Building a PubMed knowledge graph , 2020, Scientific Data.

[14]  Jian Wang,et al.  Bias Against Novelty in Science: A Cautionary Tale for Users of Bibliometric Indicators , 2015 .

[15]  H. Rothan,et al.  The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak , 2020, Journal of Autoimmunity.

[16]  W. Myers,et al.  Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact , 2013 .

[17]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Thematic fame, melodic originality, and musical zeitgeist: A biographical and transhistorical content analysis. , 1980 .

[18]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Edoardo Magnone,et al.  The extreme case of terrorism: a scientometric analysis , 2014, Scientometrics.

[20]  Yian Yin,et al.  Quantifying the Immediate Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Scientists , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[21]  A. Atkeson,et al.  What Will Be the Economic Impact of Covid-19 in the Us? Rough Estimates of Disease Scenarios , 2020 .

[22]  Ming-Wei Chang,et al.  BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding , 2019, NAACL.

[23]  Maria Chiara Di Guardo,et al.  Using a distance measure to operationalise patent originality , 2017, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[24]  Neville W. Goodman,et al.  Competition in science , 1993, Nature.

[25]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[26]  D. Chubin,et al.  Peerless Science: Peer Review and U. S. Science Policy , 1990 .

[27]  Olesya Mryglod,et al.  Quantifying the evolution of a scientific topic: reaction of the academic community to the Chornobyl disaster , 2015, Scientometrics.

[28]  Guido Lorenzoni,et al.  Macroeconomic Implications of Covid-19: Can Negative Supply Shocks Cause Demand Shortages? , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[29]  James A. Evans,et al.  Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology , 2019, Nature.

[30]  Lawrence C. Davis.  The Elements of Science. , 1994 .

[31]  Scott Frickel,et al.  When disasters strike environmental science: a case–control study of changes in scientific collaboration networks , 2019, Scientometrics.

[32]  Jaewoo Kang,et al.  BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining , 2019, Bioinform..

[33]  Kevin J. Dooley,et al.  The Effects of Repeat Collaboration on Creative Abrasion , 2010 .

[34]  Kwan Hoong Ng,et al.  Knowledge generation in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster , 2019, Scientometrics.

[35]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  Incentives and Creativity: Evidence from the Academic Life Sciences , 2009 .

[36]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[37]  Kristina Dahlin,et al.  When is an Invention Really Radical? Defining and Measuring Technological Radicalness , 2005 .

[38]  Jian Wang,et al.  Knowledge creation in collaboration networks: Effects of tie configuration , 2016 .

[39]  B. Ramesh Babu,et al.  a Scientometric Analysis , 2008 .

[40]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Consolidation in a crisis: Patterns of international collaboration in early COVID-19 research , 2020, PloS one.

[41]  George Kurian,et al.  Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation , 2016, ArXiv.

[42]  Caroline S. Wagner,et al.  International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination , 2018, Research Policy.

[43]  Michèle Lamont,et al.  What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences? , 2004 .

[44]  G. Bowker,et al.  Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams , 2004 .

[45]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations.@@@Social Stratification in Science.@@@Originality and Competition in Science: A Study of the British High Energy Physics Community. , 1976 .

[46]  Andrey Rzhetsky,et al.  Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies , 2013, ArXiv.

[47]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1996 .

[48]  Ashwini Agrawal.  The impact of investor protection law on corporate policy and performance. Evidence from the blue sky laws. , 2013 .

[49]  Sandro Galea,et al.  Mental health consequences of disasters. , 2014, Annual review of public health.

[50]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[51]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Creativity in scientific teams: : Unpacking novelty and impact , 2015 .

[52]  J. Hicks,et al.  The economics of science , 1996 .

[53]  Jian Wang,et al.  Measuring originality in science , 2019, Scientometrics.

[54]  Edoardo Magnone,et al.  An analysis for estimating the short-term effects of Japan's triple disaster on progress in materials science , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[55]  Markus Braun,et al.  Fifteen years after September 11: Where is the medical research heading? A scientometric analysis , 2018, Scientometrics.

[56]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[57]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[58]  Denis Trapido,et al.  How novelty in knowledge earns recognition: The role of consistent identities , 2015 .

[59]  G. Remuzzi,et al.  COVID-19 and Italy: what next? , 2020, The Lancet.

[60]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[61]  Xuan Wang,et al.  Comprehensive Named Entity Recognition on CORD-19 with Distant or Weak Supervision , 2020, ArXiv.

[62]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A review of the literature on citation impact indicators , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[63]  Jimmy J. Lin,et al.  Rapidly Deploying a Neural Search Engine for the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset , 2020, NLPCOVID19.