An Application of Expectancy Theory to Explain a Manager's Intention to Use a Decision Support System

A continuing gap exists between the capabilities of sophisticated computer-based information systems and the extent to which these systems are used by individuals. Studies which have examined the relationship between system utilization and various user, system, implementation, and organizational variables have provided few consistent findings. A new approach to this topic is suggested by a recent study by Davis, Bagozzi, and Warshaw [11], which indicates that individuals' intentions to use a system determine subsequent use. A large body of psychology-based research also supports this relationship between behavioral intentions and subsequent behavior. This study employs expectancy theory, which has often been used to examine behavioral intentions, to explain managers' intentions to use a decision support system (DSS). The results imply that the variables of the expectancy force model are determinants of a manager's behavioral intentions to use a DSS, and the variables of the expectancy valence model are determinants of the attractiveness of using a DSS to a manager.

[1]  N. Melone A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research , 1990 .

[2]  R. Kopelman ACROSS-INDIVIDUAL, WITHIN-INDIVIDUAL AND RETURN ON EFFORT VERSIONS OF EXPECTANCY THEORY1 , 1977 .

[3]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Why information systems fail , 1975 .

[4]  Terence Connolly,et al.  BETWEEN-SUBJECT DESIGNS IN TESTING EXPECTANCY MODELS: A METHODOLOGICAL NOTE* , 1981 .

[5]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Attitudes and Management Information System Use , 1979 .

[6]  D. Baker,et al.  Exploring Contrasting Formulations of Expectancy Theory , 1989 .

[7]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Redesign of Managerial Tasks: A Requisite for Successful Decision Support Systems , 1978, MIS Q..

[8]  Jacob Cohen Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components. , 1978 .

[9]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Comparative analysis of expectancy and heuristic models of decision behavior. , 1975 .

[10]  Linda M. Lovata Behavioral theories relating to the design of information systems , 1987 .

[11]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions , 1981 .

[12]  Martin G. Evans,et al.  Testing multiplicative models does not require ratio scales , 1979 .

[13]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of Implementation , 1978, MIS Q..

[14]  Sheldon Zedeck,et al.  An information processing model and approach to the study of motivation , 1977 .

[15]  G. Chandrasekaran,et al.  Acceptance of management science recommendations: The role of cognitive styles and dogmatism , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Mary Lippitt Nichols,et al.  A Behavioral Analysis for Planning MIS Implementation , 1981, MIS Q..

[17]  James F. Courtney,et al.  A Field Study of Organizational Factors Influencing DSS Success , 1985, MIS Q..

[18]  M. Ginzberg An organizational contingencies view of accounting and information systems implementation , 1980 .

[19]  Geoffry S. Howard,et al.  Discretionary Use of Computers: An Empirically Derived Explanatory Model* , 1991 .

[20]  George P. Huber,et al.  DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR ILL‐STRUCTURED PROBLEMS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 1987 .

[21]  James Jiambalvo,et al.  Performance Evaluation And Directed Job Effort - Model Development And Analysis In A Cpa Firm Setting , 1979 .

[22]  John P. Wanous,et al.  Expectancy theory and occupational/organizational choices: A review and test , 1983 .

[23]  Michael J. Stahl,et al.  Modeling effort decisions with behavioral decision theory: Toward an individual differences model of expectancy theory , 1981 .

[24]  Michael J. Stahl,et al.  MODELING MANAGERS' EFFORT-LEVEL DECISIONS FOR A WITHIN-PERSONS EXAMINATION OF EXPECTANCY THEORY IN A BUDGET SETTING , 1984 .

[25]  Michael J. Stahl,et al.  Using decision modeling to measure second level valences in expectancy theory , 1983 .

[26]  Henri Barki,et al.  Change, attitude to change, and decision support system success , 1985, Inf. Manag..

[27]  John K. Butler,et al.  Hierarchical vs. Non-Nested Tests For Contrasting expectancy-Valence Models: Some Effects of Cognitive Characteristics. , 1985, Multivariate behavioral research.

[28]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Expectancy models of job satisfaction, occupational preference and effort: A theoretical, methodological, and empirical appraisal. , 1974 .

[29]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[30]  Jon A. Turner,et al.  Observations on the Use of Behavioral Models in Information Systems Research and Practice , 1982, Inf. Manag..

[31]  Gerardine De Sanctis,et al.  Expectancy Theory as an Explanation of Voluntary Use of a Decision-Support System: , 1983 .

[32]  Abraham Peled,et al.  The next computer revolution , 1987 .

[33]  John J. Lawler,et al.  A policy-capturing investigation of the role of expectancies in decisions to pursue job alternatives. , 1983 .

[34]  C. R. Franz,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT, USER INVOLVEMENT, AND THE USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS* , 1986 .

[35]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1986 POWER OVER USERS : ITS EXERCISE BY SYSTEM PROFESSIONALS , 2017 .

[36]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Concepts, Theory, and Techniques: FACTORS AFFECTING THE PERCEIVED UTILIZATION OF COMPUTER-BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS IN THE OIL INDUSTRY , 1982 .

[37]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[38]  L. Beach,et al.  Expectancy Theory, Decision Theory and Occupational Preference and Choice. Organizational Research. Technical Report 75-75. , 1975 .