Dynamic vehicle–track interaction in switches and crossings and the influence of rail pad stiffness – field measurements and validation of a simulation model

A model for simulation of dynamic interaction between a railway vehicle and a turnout (switch and crossing, S&C) is validated versus field measurements. In particular, the implementation and accuracy of viscously damped track models with different complexities are assessed. The validation data come from full-scale field measurements of dynamic track stiffness and wheel–rail contact forces in a demonstrator turnout that was installed as part of the INNOTRACK project with funding from the European Union Sixth Framework Programme. Vertical track stiffness at nominal wheel loads, in the frequency range up to 20 Hz, was measured using a rolling stiffness measurement vehicle (RSMV). Vertical and lateral wheel–rail contact forces were measured by an instrumented wheel set mounted in a freight car featuring Y25 bogies. The measurements were performed for traffic in both the through and diverging routes, and in the facing and trailing moves. The full set of test runs was repeated with different types of rail pad to investigate the influence of rail pad stiffness on track stiffness and contact forces. It is concluded that impact loads on the crossing can be reduced by using more resilient rail pads. To allow for vehicle dynamics simulations at low computational cost, the track models are discretised space-variant mass–spring–damper models that are moving with each wheel set of the vehicle model. Acceptable agreement between simulated and measured vertical contact forces at the crossing can be obtained when the standard GENSYS track model is extended with one ballast/subgrade mass under each rail. This model can be tuned to capture the large phase delay in dynamic track stiffness at low frequencies, as measured by the RSMV, while remaining sufficiently resilient at higher frequencies.

[1]  Susan Eitelman,et al.  Matlab Version 6.5 Release 13. The MathWorks, Inc., 3 Apple Hill Dr., Natick, MA 01760-2098; 508/647-7000, Fax 508/647-7001, www.mathworks.com , 2003 .

[2]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Simulation of wheel-rail contact and damage in switches & crossings , 2009 .

[3]  Nizar Chaar Wheelset Structural Flexibility and Track Flexibility in Vehicle-Track Dynamic Interaction , 2007 .

[4]  Björn A. Pålsson,et al.  Design optimisation of switch rails in railway turnouts , 2013 .

[5]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Geometry and stiffness optimization for switches and crossings, and simulation of material degradation , 2010 .

[6]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Track gauge optimisation of railway switches using a genetic algorithm , 2012 .

[7]  D Lyon,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TRACK AND VEHICLE PARAMETERS ON WHEEL/RAIL VERTICAL DYNAMIC FORCES , 1974 .

[8]  Roger Lundén,et al.  High-frequency vertical wheel–rail contact forces—Field measurements and influence of track irregularities , 2008 .

[9]  J. Nielsen High-frequency vertical wheel-rail contact forces-Validation of a prediction model by field testing , 2008 .

[10]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Dynamic interaction between train and railway turnout: full-scale field test and validation of simulation models , 2008 .

[11]  Mats Berg,et al.  Challenges in simulation of rail vehicle dynamics , 2009 .

[12]  S. Brunia,et al.  Effects of train impacts on urban turnouts : Modelling and validation through measurements , 2009 .

[13]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Wheel–rail interaction and damage in switches and crossings , 2012 .

[14]  Eric Berggren,et al.  Railway Track Stiffness Dynamic Measurements and Evaluation for Efficient Maintenance , 2009 .

[15]  Sidney Addelman,et al.  trans-Dimethanolbis(1,1,1-trifluoro-5,5-dimethylhexane-2,4-dionato)zinc(II) , 2008, Acta crystallographica. Section E, Structure reports online.

[16]  V. Markine,et al.  Combatting RCF on switch points by tuning elastic track properties , 2011 .