When intake exceeds input: Language specific perceptual illusions induced by L1 prosodic constraints

In this paper we argue that the prosodic well-formedness conditions of a learner's native language phonology interfere with accurate perception of non-native segmental sequences. This interference induces a perceptual illusion effect due to which learners perceive an illusory vowel that, in fact, does not exist in the acoustic signal. In this way, a learner's percept of the L2 input, or L2 intake, actually includes more segmental material than is physically present. As a product of the native language phonology, these perceptual illusions are shown to occur only in environments where L2 segmental sequences cannot be licensed by L1 prosodic constituents. In addition, the quality of the perceived illusory vowel is shown to coincide with the vowel category inserted by a learner's native language phonology in environments conditioning epenthesis. Finally, by varying the duration of interstimulus intervals in an AX discrimination task, we reveal latent capacities to overcome the perceptual illusion effect when finer grained acoustic representations are made accessible. We conclude that perception of illusory segments is a direct result of a learner's native language phonology generating a phonological representation that abides by the prosodic constraints of the learner's native language.

[1]  L. Frank The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .

[2]  S. Coder Significance of learners' errors , 1967 .

[3]  S. P. Corder THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LEARNER'S ERRORS , 1967 .

[4]  R. M. Warren Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.

[5]  D. Pisoni Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels , 1973, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories , 1974, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  R. M. Warren chapter 11 – Auditory Illusions and Perceptual Processes , 1976 .

[8]  D. Massaro,et al.  Phonological constraints in speech perception , 1980 .

[9]  A. Samuel Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Decay of auditory memory in vowel discrimination. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  D. Massaro,et al.  Phonological context in speech perception , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  J. Werker,et al.  Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J S Logan,et al.  Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  N. Cowan,et al.  The use of auditory and phonetic memory in vowel discrimination. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  A. Samuel Lexical uniqueness effects on phonemic restoration , 1987 .

[16]  B H Repp,et al.  Perceptual restoration of a “missing” speech sound: Auditory induction or illusion? , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Ellen Broselow Nonobvious Transfer: On Predicting Epenthesis Errors , 1992 .

[18]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[19]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Emergence of Language-Specific Constraints in Perception of Non-Native Speech: A Window on Early Phonological Development , 1993 .

[20]  R. M. Warren,et al.  Auditory induction: Reciprocal changes in alternating sounds , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  A prosodic analysis of nonderived-environment blocking , 1995 .

[22]  J. Mehler,et al.  A destressing deafness in French , 1997 .

[23]  Rakesh Mohan Bhatt,et al.  Optimal L2 Syllables: Interactions of Transfer and Developmental Effects. , 1997 .

[24]  U. Frauenfelder,et al.  Processing of illegal consonant clusters : A case of perceptual assimilation ? , 1998 .

[25]  Cynthia A. Brown,et al.  The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure , 1998 .

[26]  M. Pitt,et al.  Phonological processes and the perception of phonotactically illegal consonant clusters , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The processing of illegal consonant clusters: A case of perceptual assimilation? , 1998 .

[28]  Ellen Broselow,et al.  THE EMERGENCE OF THE UNMARKED IN SECOND LANGUAGE PHONOLOGY , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[29]  Cynthia Brown The Interrelation between Speech Perception and Phonological Acquisition from Infant to Adult* , 1999 .

[30]  J. Mehler,et al.  Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? , 1999, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[31]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Phonological Processing: A Cross-linguistic Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Hamilton The Insignificance of Learners' Errors: A Philosophical Investigation of the Interlanguage Hypothesis. , 2001 .

[33]  Janet F. Werker,et al.  Cross-Language Speech Perception : Initial Capabilities and Developmental Change , 2001 .

[34]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  A typological study of stress ‘deafness’ , 2002 .

[35]  Y. Tohkura,et al.  A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes , 2003, Cognition.