Consumer preference–enabled intelligent energy management for smart cities using game theoretic social tie

In smart cities, balanced energy usage is a classic scheduling target in decision-making of power systems. To handle multiple energy consumers, energy management is usually built based on game theory. Despite their effectiveness, they do not consider consumer preferences, which are however important in developing salient scheduling frameworks. For the first time, this work explores consumer preference–based social networking in computing-optimized schedules to facilitate the incorporation in energy management. We propose the consumer preference driven intelligent energy management technique for smart cities using game theoretic social tie. In our technique, social communities are constructed based on the preference of electricity usage. To support dynamic decisions in the consumer preference–induced game, community pricing strategy is adjusted during each time period through leveraging cooperative game theory. The simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed intelligent energy management technique.

[1]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Community Structure in Large Networks: Natural Cluster Sizes and the Absence of Large Well-Defined Clusters , 2008, Internet Math..

[2]  Shiyan Hu,et al.  Design Automation of Cyber-Physical Systems: Challenges, Advances, and Opportunities , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[3]  Matthew Rowe,et al.  A Peak Reduction Scheduling Algorithm for Storage Devices on the Low Voltage Network , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[4]  Antonio Capone,et al.  A power scheduling game for reducing the peak demand of residential users , 2013, 2013 IEEE Online Conference on Green Communications (OnlineGreenComm).

[5]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[6]  Wen-Long Chin,et al.  Energy Big Data Security Threats in IoT-Based Smart Grid Communications , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Wei Cheng,et al.  CGC: A Flexible and Robust Approach to Integrating Co-Regularized Multi-Domain Graph for Clustering , 2016, ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data.

[8]  Jiming Chen,et al.  A Survey on Demand Response in Smart Grids: Mathematical Models and Approaches , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[9]  Victor C. M. Leung,et al.  Energy-Efficient Topology Control With Selective Diversity in Cooperative Wireless Ad Hoc Networks: A Game-Theoretic Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  P. Reny On the Existence of Pure and Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibria in Discontinuous Games , 1999 .

[11]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Lei Shu,et al.  A Game Theory-Based Energy Management System Using Price Elasticity for Smart Grids , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[13]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  Cutting Down Electricity Cost in Internet Data Centers by Using Energy Storage , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[14]  Taskin Koçak,et al.  A Survey on Smart Grid Potential Applications and Communication Requirements , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[15]  Zhu Han,et al.  Demand side management to reduce Peak-to-Average Ratio using game theory in smart grid , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM Workshops.

[16]  Zhaohui Tang,et al.  The review of demand side management and load forecasting in smart grid , 2016, 2016 12th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA).

[17]  Peter Palensky,et al.  Demand Side Management: Demand Response, Intelligent Energy Systems, and Smart Loads , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[18]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[19]  George Kesidis,et al.  Incentive-Based Energy Consumption Scheduling Algorithms for the Smart Grid , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[20]  Richard H. Middleton,et al.  Distributed Demand Peak Reduction With Non-Cooperative Players and Minimal Communication , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[21]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society , 2005, Nature.

[22]  Xin Li,et al.  Social Networking Reduces Peak Power Consumption in Smart Grid , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[23]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  Real-Time Demand Response Model , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[24]  Seyed Masoud Moghaddas Tafreshi,et al.  Long-Term Market Equilibrium in Smart Grid Paradigm With Introducing Demand Response Provider in Competition , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[25]  Wayes Tushar,et al.  Customer Engagement Plans for Peak Load Reduction in Residential Smart Grids , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[26]  Shaojie Tang,et al.  Smoothing the energy consumption: Peak demand reduction in smart grid , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[27]  Xi Fang,et al.  3. Full Four-channel 6.3-gb/s 60-ghz Cmos Transceiver with Low-power Analog and Digital Baseband Circuitry 7. Smart Grid — the New and Improved Power Grid: a Survey , 2022 .