The Impact of Scope Creep on Project Success: An Empirical Investigation

Advocates of software engineering and software project management stated in the literature that creeping of scope is one of the most common causes for the failure of software projects. Also, advocates believed that it could occur in almost every software project, which leads to compromise in quality, delayed schedules, increase cost and decreased customer satisfaction. However, the lack of empirical evidence demands a comprehensive investigation to identify the factors of scope creep and to propose a conceptual framework to empirically evaluate the impact of scope creep on software project success. To determine the scope creep factors in this study, two exploratory methods, i.e. a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and interview from experts are performed. Following the analysis of these methods, a conceptual framework is proposed. To empirically evaluate the proposed conceptual framework, data is collected through a survey method. Next, the collected data is analyzed through Partial Least Squares’ Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). From the results, it is evident that the identified factors of scope creep are negatively associated with software project success. The results of empirical evaluation also second the findings of SLR. The outcome of the study may help the practitioners to understand the dynamics of factors, which undermine scope creep in software SMEs and to assist them in the development of effective control and mitigation strategies, therefore, to increase the project success rate.

[1]  Jamal Moustafaev Project Scope Management: A Practical Guide to Requirements for Engineering, Product, Construction, IT and Enterprise Projects , 2014 .

[2]  Ralf Fahney,et al.  How to assign cost to “avoidable requirements creep”: A step towards the waterfall's agilization , 2011, 2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference.

[3]  Hadi Al‐Abrrow,et al.  The Effect of Organizational Resilience and CEO’s Narcissism on Project Success: Organizational Risk as Mediating Variable , 2018, Organization Management Journal.

[4]  Charles B. Daniels,et al.  The Root Cause of Failure in Complex IT Projects: Complexity Itself , 2013, Complex Adaptive Systems.

[5]  Rajesri Govindaraju,et al.  Requirement Volatility, Standardization and Knowledge Integration in Software Projects: An Empirical Analysis on Outsourced IS Development Projects , 2015 .

[6]  P. Schofield A Companion to Qualitative Research , 2005 .

[7]  K. Lakshmi Madhuri,et al.  Influence of Scope Creep on Project Success : A Comparative Study between Conventional Approach Verses Agile Approach , 2013 .

[8]  Coenrad J. Fourie,et al.  A risk and cost management analysis for changes during the construction phase of a project , 2016 .

[9]  Björn Regnell,et al.  Are you biting off more than you can chew? A case study on causes and effects of overscoping in large-scale software engineering , 2012, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[10]  Yang Tuan,et al.  CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR ON E-GOVERNMENT IT PROJECTS IN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM , 2016 .

[11]  Stephen Riddle,et al.  A review of practice and problems in requirements engineering in small and medium software enterprises in Thailand , 2014, 2014 IEEE 4th International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE).

[12]  Silvia Mara Abrahão,et al.  Requirements Uncertainty in a Software Product Line , 2011, 2011 15th International Software Product Line Conference.

[13]  Naveed Ahmad,et al.  Calculating completeness of software project scope definition , 2018, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[14]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis , 2004 .

[15]  Uzair Iqbal Janjua,et al.  Identification of scope creep factors and their impact on software project success , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS).

[16]  N. Alp,et al.  Scope management and change control process study for project-based companies in the construction and engineering industries , 2012, 2012 Proceedings of PICMET '12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies.

[17]  Muhammad Irfan,et al.  The Effect of Project Management Capabilities on Project Success in Pakistan: An Empirical Investigation , 2019, IEEE Access.

[18]  L. G. Bellenger Avoiding Scope Creep Protects the Bottom Line , 2003 .

[19]  M. Host,et al.  Experimental context classification: incentives and experience of subjects , 2005, Proceedings. 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2005. ICSE 2005..

[20]  Qian Wang,et al.  Research on optimization of software development project process based on theory of project management , 2010, 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering(ICACTE).

[21]  Osama Abbas Hussain Direct Cost Of Scope Creep In Governmental Construction Projects In Qatar , 2012 .

[22]  V. Suma,et al.  Influence of domain and technology upon scope creep in software projects , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Advances in Electronics Computers and Communications.

[23]  Adam Alami,et al.  Why Do Information Technology Projects Fail? , 2016, CENTERIS/ProjMAN/HCist.

[24]  Tony Gorschek,et al.  Obsolete software requirements , 2013, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[25]  Anitha S. Pillai,et al.  A survey on global requirements elicitation issues and proposed research framework , 2013, 2013 IEEE 4th International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science.

[26]  Rahul Sharma,et al.  Controlling the uncontrolled by noticing the unnoticed , 2017, 2017 12th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT).

[27]  Rusdi Akbar Performance measurement and accountability in Indonesian Local Government , 2011 .

[28]  Amrit Lal Sangal,et al.  Investigating the factors which impact SPI implementation initiatives in software SMEs—A systematic map and review , 2019, J. Softw. Evol. Process..

[29]  Romain Robbes,et al.  Requirements Engineering Practices in Very Small Software Enterprises: A Diagnostic Study , 2010, 2010 XXIX International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society.

[30]  Shahnawaz Khan,et al.  Causes of Time and Cost Overrun: A Case Study of Health Sector Projects in Peshawar, KP , 2019 .

[31]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  Partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for Building and Testing Behavioral Causal Theory: When to Choose It and How to Use It , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[32]  Arshad Ali Shahid,et al.  Scope management in agile versus traditional software development methods , 2010, NSEC '10.

[33]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[34]  Virginia A. Greiman,et al.  Megaproject Management: Lessons on Risk and Project Management from the Big Dig , 2013 .

[35]  Charles W. Chesterman,et al.  Interpreting barriers to success in software development and deployment using systems theory , 2016, Int. J. Syst. Syst. Eng..

[36]  Tony Gorschek,et al.  Supporting Scope Tracking and Visualization for Very Large-Scale Requirements Engineering-Utilizing FSC+, Decision Patterns, and Atomic Decision Visualizations , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[37]  Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues,et al.  The Role of Wearable Technologies in Supply Chain Collaboration: A Case of Pharmaceutical Industry , 2019, IEEE Access.

[38]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Analyzing Qualitative Data , 2017, ISS.

[39]  Casper Lassenius,et al.  Perceived causes of software project failures - An analysis of their relationships , 2014, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[40]  V. Suma,et al.  A triangular perception of scope creep influencing the project success , 2018, Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Anitha S. Pillai,et al.  A study on project scope as a requirements elicitation issue , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom).

[42]  Milind Padalkar,et al.  Six decades of project management research: Thematic trends and future opportunities , 2016 .

[43]  Carl B Traylor Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling , 2014 .

[44]  Muhammad Danaparamita,et al.  Understanding the influence of poor scope management affecting the successful of an IT Project , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech).

[45]  Debajyoti Pal,et al.  Analyzing the Elderly Users’ Adoption of Smart-Home Services , 2018, IEEE Access.

[46]  Mian M. Ajmal,et al.  Exploring factors behind project scope creep – stakeholders’ perspective , 2019 .

[47]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Conceptualizing and testing formative constructs: tutorial and annotated example , 2009, DATB.

[48]  Levi Shaul,et al.  Hierarchical Examination of Success Factors across ERP Life-Cycle , 2010, MCIS.

[49]  Robert J. Hammell,et al.  Scope as a Leading Indicator for Managing Software Development , 2011, 2011 Ninth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications.

[50]  Zohreh Pourzolfaghar,et al.  Significance of Scope in Project Success , 2013 .

[51]  Frank Lindner,et al.  Project Knowledge Management Organizational Design and Success Factors - An Empirical Study in Germany , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[52]  Aybüke Aurum,et al.  Knowledge management in software engineering - describing the process , 2004, 2004 Australian Software Engineering Conference. Proceedings..

[53]  João Varajão,et al.  Success Management as a PM Knowledge Area – Work-in-Progress☆ , 2016 .

[54]  Marly Monteiro de Carvalho,et al.  Project management and its effects on project success: Cross-country and cross-industry comparisons , 2015 .

[55]  Uzair Iqbal Janjua,et al.  Role of academia to make current practices of software project risk management more effective: An exploratory study , 2015, 2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC).

[56]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  A review of studies on expert estimation of software development effort , 2004, J. Syst. Softw..

[57]  Rahul Thakurta Impact of Scope Creep on Software Project Quality* , 2016 .

[58]  Boaz Ronen,et al.  Excessive software development: Practices and penalties , 2017 .

[59]  Awais Ahmad,et al.  Systematic literature review and empirical investigation of barriers to process improvement in global software development: Client-vendor perspective , 2017, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[60]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  Fuzzy decision analysis for project scope change management , 2017 .

[61]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A tertiary study , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[62]  Chris Procter,et al.  Florence Duomo project (1420–1436): Learning best project management practice from history , 2014 .

[63]  A. Pollock,et al.  How to do a systematic review , 2018, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[64]  Ian Alexander,et al.  An introduction to qualitative research , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[65]  Angela Boland,et al.  Doing a Systematic Review. A Student's Guide. Third Edition , 2023, Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique.

[66]  C. Amoatey,et al.  Investigating the major causes of scope creep in real estate construction projects in Ghana , 2017 .

[67]  Anitha S. Pillai,et al.  A study on the software requirements elicitation issues - its causes and effects , 2013, 2013 Third World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies (WICT 2013).

[68]  Anthony S. White,et al.  A control model of the software requirements process , 2013, Kybernetes.

[69]  Masoumeh Feyz Abadi,et al.  ScienceDirect International Conference on Accounting Studies 2014 , ICAS 2014 , 18-19 August 2014 , Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia Impact of service quality , trust and perceived value on customer loyalty in Malaysia services industries , 2015 .

[70]  Justin Zobel,et al.  Writing for Computer Science , 2014, Springer London.