Influence of Hand Tracking as a Way of Interaction in Virtual Reality on User Experience

With the rising interest in Virtual Reality and the fast development and improvement of available devices, new features of interactions are becoming available. One of them that is becoming very popular is hand tracking, as the idea to replace controllers for interactions in virtual worlds. This experiment aims to compare different interaction types in VR using either controllers or hand tracking. Participants had to play two simple VR games with various types of tasks in those games — grabbing objects or typing numbers. While playing, they were using interactions with different visualizations of hands and controllers. The focus of this study was to investigate user experience of varying interactions (controller vs. hand tracking) for those two simple tasks. Results show that different interaction types statistically significantly influence reported emotions with Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), where for hand tracking participants were feeling higher valence, but lower arousal and dominance. Additionally, task type of grabbing was reported to be more realistic, and participants experienced a higher presence. Surprisingly, participants rated the interaction type with controllers where both where hands and controllers were visualized as statistically most preferred. Finally, hand tracking for both tasks was rated with the System Usability Scale (SUS) scale, and hand tracking for the task typing was rated as statistically significantly more usable. These results can drive further research and, in the long term, contribute to help selecting the most matching interaction modality for a task.

[1]  Charles R. Cameron,et al.  Hand tracking and visualization in a virtual reality simulation , 2011, 2011 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium.

[2]  Cristina Manresa-Yee,et al.  Hand Tracking and Gesture Recognition for Human-Computer Interaction , 2009, Progress in Computer Vision and Image Analysis.

[3]  Olivier Debeir,et al.  Multi-sensor data fusion for hand tracking using Kinect and Leap Motion , 2014, VRIC.

[4]  Katerina Mania,et al.  The Effects of Levels of Immersion on Memory and Presence in Virtual Environments: A Reality Centered Approach , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[7]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Efficient and precise interactive hand tracking through joint, continuous optimization of pose and correspondences , 2016, ACM Trans. Graph..

[8]  Pavel Zahorik,et al.  Presence as Being-in-the-World , 1998, Presence.

[9]  Jovan Popovic,et al.  Real-time hand-tracking with a color glove , 2009, SIGGRAPH '09.

[10]  Marina Krcmar,et al.  Video Games, Immersion, and Cognitive Aggression: Does the Controller Matter? , 2013 .

[11]  Naveen Kumar Sankaran,et al.  Using Virtual Reality Simulation Environments to Assess Competence for Emergency Medicine Learners , 2018, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[12]  Gavin McArdle,et al.  Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Thomas Franke,et al.  A Personal Resource for Technology Interaction: Development and Validation of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Creating Interactive Virtual Humans: Some Assembly Required , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[15]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[16]  Frederick P. Brooks What's Real About Virtual Reality? , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[17]  Soh-Khim Ong,et al.  Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing , 2004, MIM.