Choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to improve

Modern forms of energy are an important vehicle towards poverty alleviation in rural areas of developing countries. Most developing countries٠households heavily rely on wood fuel which impact their health and socialӥconomic status. To ease such a dependency, other modern forms of energy, namely electricity, need to be provided. However, the quality of the electricity service, namely reliability, is an important factor in reducing this dependency. This paper discusses a choice experiment valuation study conducted among electrified rural households located in Kisumu, Kenya, in which the willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid power outages or blackouts was estimated. A mixed logit estimation was applied to identify the various socio-economic and demographic characteristics which determine preferences to reduce power outages among a householdٳ users. In conclusion, several of the socio-economic and demographic characteristics outlined in this paper were identified and can assist service differentiation to accommodate the diverse households٠preferences towards the improvement of the electricity service.

[1]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Customers' Choice Among Retail Energy Suppliers: The Willingness-to-Pay for Service Attributes , 2000 .

[2]  Chi-Keung Woo,et al.  Household Preference for Interruptible Rate Options and the Revealed Value of Service Reliability , 1988 .

[3]  Alberto Longo,et al.  Basic Statistical Models for Stated Choice Studies , 2007 .

[4]  Li An,et al.  Negotiation Analysis: An Introduction , 2002 .

[5]  Stefano Pagiola,et al.  A review of the valuation of environmental costs and benefits in World Bank projects , 2003 .

[6]  Seung-Jun Kwak,et al.  Valuing environmental impacts of large dam construction in Korea: An application of choice experiments , 2008 .

[7]  Abdou Ndour,et al.  GLOBAL NETWORK ON ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (GNESD) , 2008 .

[8]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  A primer on nonmarket valuation , 2003 .

[9]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Distributional Assumptions in Mixed Logit Models , 2006 .

[10]  D. Dillman,et al.  How to conduct your own survey , 1994 .

[11]  L. Oerlemans,et al.  The early adoption of green power by Dutch households : an empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes , 2005 .

[12]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[13]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The Mixed Logit Model: the State of Practice and Warnings for the Unwary , 2001 .

[14]  Maria Teresa Ayala.  PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE , 2010 .

[15]  Joseph H. Eto,et al.  Cost of Power Interruptions to Electricity Consumers in the United States (U.S.) , 2006 .

[16]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain , 2002 .

[17]  G. A. Bloemhof,et al.  25 years outage data, ready for the future [Dutch power systems] , 2001 .

[18]  J. Ladenburg,et al.  Economic valuation of the visual externalities of off-shore wind farms , 2005 .

[19]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  A practical test for the choice of mixing distribution in discrete choice models , 2005 .

[20]  K. Lancaster.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Does it Matter When a Power Outage Occurs? - A Choice Experiment Study on the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Power Outages , 2008 .

[22]  N. Hanley,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment , 1998 .

[23]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[24]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  The Cost of Electric Power Interruptions in the Industrial Sector: Estimates Derived from Interruptible Service Programs , 1992 .

[25]  David Brownstone,et al.  Discrete Choice Modeling for Transportation , 2001 .

[26]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[27]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .

[28]  N. Hanley,et al.  Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation? , 2002 .

[29]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[30]  Jeffrey Bennett,et al.  A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling with second-order interactions , 2006 .

[31]  E. Quah,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis , 1972 .

[32]  Michael Beenstock,et al.  Response bias in a conjoint analysis of power outages , 1998 .

[33]  Alberto Longo,et al.  The Internalization of Externalities in the Production of Electricity: Willingness to Pay for the Attributes of a Policy for Renewable Energy , 2006 .

[34]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation , 2001 .

[35]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[36]  M. Munasinghe.  Costs incurred by residential electricity consumers due to power failures , 1980 .

[37]  B. Roe,et al.  US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity , 2001 .

[38]  M. Gribaudo,et al.  2002 , 2001, Cell and Tissue Research.

[39]  Chi-Keung Woo,et al.  How much do electric customers want to pay for reliability; New evidence on an old controversy , 1991 .

[40]  Riccardo Scarpa.  Does Money Talk? The Effect of a Monetary Attribute on the Marginal Rate of Substitution in a Choice Experiment , 2006 .

[41]  Arun Barnes Douglas Mohan Prasad C. Sanghvi.  Rural Electrification : Lessons Learned , 2001 .

[42]  P. Zarembka.  Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .

[43]  A. Bergmann,et al.  Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments , 2006 .

[44]  Petr Mariel,et al.  The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: some empirical evidence. , 2009 .

[45]  P. Champ.  Collecting Survey Data for Nonmarket Valuation , 2003 .

[46]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Travel behaviour research : the leading edge , 2001 .

[47]  P. Rastgoufard,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of electric power system reliability , 1994, Proceedings of 26th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory.

[48]  David Brownstone,et al.  Discrete Choice Modelling for Transportation , 2001 .

[49]  Joffre Swait,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Relaxing the IID assumption – introducing variants of the MNL model , 2000 .