A systems identification approach to estimating the connectivity in a neuronal population model

Mapping the brain and its complex networked structure has been one of the most researched topics in the last decade and continues to be the path towards understanding brain diseases. In this paper we present a new approach to estimating the connectivity between neurons in a network model. We use systems identification techniques for nonlinear dynamic models to compute the synaptic connections from other pre-synaptic neurons in the population. We are able to show accurate estimation even in the presence of model error and inaccurate assumption of post-synaptic potential dynamics. This allows to compute the connectivity matrix of the network using a very small time window of membrane potential data of the individual neurons. The specificity and sensitivity measures for randomly generated networks are reported.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  P. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[3]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Book Review , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Jianhong Wu,et al.  Data clustering - theory, algorithms, and applications , 2007 .

[5]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  The future of FMRI connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[6]  Nathalia Peixoto,et al.  Real-time tracking of neuronal network structure using data assimilation. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[8]  G. Edelman,et al.  Large-scale model of mammalian thalamocortical systems , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Karl J. Friston.  Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[10]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Simple model of spiking neurons , 2003, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[11]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  On the use of correlation as a measure of network connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[12]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  The dual effect of membrane potential on sodium conductance in the giant axon of Loligo , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  V. Verdult,et al.  Filtering and System Identification: A Least Squares Approach , 2007 .

[14]  F Babiloni,et al.  Time-variant partial directed coherence for analysing connectivity: a methodological study , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  Eugene M Izhikevich,et al.  Hybrid spiking models , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Filtering and System Identification: Frontmatter , 2007 .