Critical subsystem failure mitigation in an indoor UAV testbed

An autonomous safety mechanism is presented, as implemented in an indoor flying vehicle research testbed. The safety mechanism relies on integration of onboard gyroscope measurements and thrust commands to estimate the vehicle state for short lengths of time. It is used in the case of loss of external control signal or loss of external measurement data, to reduce the likelihood of a vehicle crash, or at least reduce the severity of an unavoidable crash. As UAVs move into ever more mainstream applications with increased public interaction, such safety systems become more critical.

[1]  Raffaello D'Andrea,et al.  A simple learning strategy for high-speed quadrocopter multi-flips , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Towards a navigation system for autonomous indoor flying , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Markus Hehn,et al.  A flying inverted pendulum , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Philippe Martin,et al.  The true role of accelerometer feedback in quadrotor control , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Versatile distributed pose estimation and sensor self-calibration for an autonomous MAV , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  B. Bethke,et al.  Real-time indoor autonomous vehicle test environment , 2008, IEEE Control Systems.

[7]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  The GRASP Multiple Micro-UAV Testbed , 2010, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[8]  N. Roy,et al.  Autonomous Navigation and Exploration of a Quadrotor Helicopter in GPS-denied Indoor Environments , 2009 .

[9]  Naresh K. Sinha,et al.  Modern Control Systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  Claire J. Tomlin,et al.  Precision flight control for a multi-vehicle quadrotor helicopter testbed , 2011 .

[11]  Sergei Lupashin,et al.  Synchronizing the motion of a quadrocopter to music , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Peter H. Zipfel,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Aerospace Vehicle Dynamics , 2001 .

[13]  Douglas P. Looze.  Franklin, Powell and Emami-Naeini, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, 6 th Edition, Prentice-Hall, 2010. (referred to as FPE) References: Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, Prentice-Hall, 2009. Dorf, Modern Control Systems, Prentice-Hall, 2008. , 2013 .

[14]  Steven L. Waslander,et al.  The Stanford testbed of autonomous rotorcraft for multi agent control (STARMAC) , 2004, The 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37576).

[15]  Peter H. Zipfel,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Aerospace Vehicle Dynamics, Second Edition , 2007 .

[16]  Raffaello D'Andrea,et al.  Quadrocopter ball juggling , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.