Spiral imaging in fMRI

T2*-weighted Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) requires efficient acquisition methods in order to fully sample the brain in a several second time period. The most widely used approach is Echo Planar Imaging (EPI), which utilizes a Cartesian trajectory to cover k-space. This trajectory is subject to ghosts from off-resonance and gradient imperfections and is intrinsically sensitive to cardiac-induced pulsatile motion from substantial first- and higher order moments of the gradient waveform near the k-space origin. In addition, only the readout direction gradient contributes significant energy to the trajectory. By contrast, the spiral method samples k-space with an Archimedean or similar trajectory that begins at the k-space center and spirals to the edge (spiral-out), or its reverse, ending at the origin (spiral-in). Spiral methods have reduced sensitivity to motion, shorter readout times, improved signal recovery in most frontal and parietal brain regions, and exhibit blurring artifacts instead of ghosts or geometric distortion. Methods combining spiral-in and spiral-out trajectories have further advantages in terms of diminished susceptibility-induced signal dropout and increased BOLD signal. In measurements of temporal signal to noise ratio measured in 8 subjects, spiral-in/out exhibited significant increases over EPI in voxel volumes recovered in frontal and whole brain regions (18% and 10%, respectively).

[1]  Elfar Adalsteinsson,et al.  Simple analytic variable density spiral design , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Sources of distortion in functional MRI data , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[4]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k‐space trajectories , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Hua Guo,et al.  Single‐shot spiral image acquisition with embedded z‐shimming for susceptibility signal recovery , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  Catie Chang,et al.  Variable‐density spiral‐in/out functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Alison R Preston,et al.  Comparison of spiral-in/out and spiral-out BOLD fMRI at 1.5 and 3 T , 2004, NeuroImage.

[8]  Jean A. Tkach,et al.  Improvement of spiral MRI with the measured k‐space trajectory , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  D. Nishimura,et al.  Reduced aliasing artifacts using variable‐density k‐space sampling trajectories , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Comparison of fMRI activation at 3 and 1.5 T during perceptual, cognitive, and affective processing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  G H Glover,et al.  Three‐dimensional spiral fMRI technique: A comparison with 2D spiral acquisition , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Catie Chang,et al.  Hadamard-encoded sub-slice fMRI for reduced signal dropout. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Reduction of susceptibility artifact in gradient‐echo imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  G. Glover,et al.  Self‐navigated spiral fMRI: Interleaved versus single‐shot , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Wilson Fong Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences , 2005 .

[16]  G H Glover,et al.  Motion Artifacts in fMRI: Comparison of 2DFT with PR and Spiral Scan Methods , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Yanle Hu,et al.  Three‐dimensional spiral technique for high‐resolution functional MRI , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Trong-Kha Truong,et al.  Single‐shot dual‐z‐shimmed sensitivity‐encoded spiral‐in/out imaging for functional MRI with reduced susceptibility artifacts , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  Discrimination of Large Venous Vessels in Time‐Course Spiral Blood‐Oxygen‐Level‐Dependent Magnetic‐Resonance Functional Neuroimaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Deepak B. Khatry,et al.  Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Asthmatics , 2010 .

[21]  A. Macovski,et al.  Selection of a convolution function for Fourier inversion using gridding [computerised tomography application]. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[22]  Chunlei Liu,et al.  Sliding‐window sensitivity encoding (SENSE) calibration for reducing noise in functional MRI (fMRI) , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  P. Mansfield Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes , 1977 .

[24]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Peter van Gelderen,et al.  A comparison of fast MR scan techniques for cerebral activation studies at 1.5 Tesla , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  A. Song,et al.  An improved gridding method for spiral MRI using nonuniform fast Fourier transform. , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[28]  M. Moseley,et al.  Self‐navigated interleaved spiral (SNAILS): Application to high‐resolution diffusion tensor imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  C. Crawford,et al.  Optimized gradient waveforms for spiral scanning , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Peter van Gelderen,et al.  Fast 3D functional magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T with spiral acquisition , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Gary H Glover,et al.  Rapid MRI method for mapping the longitudinal relaxation time. , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[32]  G. Glover,et al.  Spiral‐in/out BOLD fMRI for increased SNR and reduced susceptibility artifacts , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Comparison of 3D BOLD Functional MRI with Spiral Acquisition at 1.5 and 4.0 T , 1999, NeuroImage.

[34]  Y Yang,et al.  Fast spiral magnetic resonance imaging with trapezoidal gradients. , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[35]  Robert A. Österbauer,et al.  Sensitivity‐encoded single‐shot spiral imaging for reduced susceptibility artifacts in BOLD fMRI , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  Gary H Glover,et al.  Improved combination of spiral‐in/out images for BOLD fMRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  J. Cohen,et al.  Spiral K‐space MR imaging of cortical activation , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[38]  Bob S. Hu,et al.  Fast Spiral Coronary Artery Imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[39]  G H Glover,et al.  Simple analytic spiral K‐space algorithm , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  Gary H Glover,et al.  Increasing spatial coverage for high‐resolution functional MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[41]  P Börnert,et al.  Reversed spiral MR imaging , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[42]  G. McCarthy,et al.  FMRI signal source analysis using diffusion-weighted spiral-in acquisition , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[43]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Foundations of advanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, NeuroRX.

[44]  C. Ahn,et al.  High-Speed Spiral-Scan Echo Planar NMR Imaging-I , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.