Consistent and reproducible cultures of large-scale 3D mammary epithelial structures using an accessible bioprinting platform

BackgroundStandard three-dimensional (3D) in vitro culture techniques, such as those used for mammary epithelial cells, rely on random distribution of cells within hydrogels. Although these systems offer advantages over traditional 2D models, limitations persist owing to the lack of control over cellular placement within the hydrogel. This results in experimental inconsistencies and random organoid morphology. Robust, high-throughput experimentation requires greater standardization of 3D epithelial culture techniques.MethodsHere, we detail the use of a 3D bioprinting platform as an investigative tool to control the 3D formation of organoids through the “self-assembly” of human mammary epithelial cells. Experimental bioprinting procedures were optimized to enable the formation of controlled arrays of individual mammary organoids. We define the distance and cell number parameters necessary to print individual organoids that do not interact between print locations as well as those required to generate large contiguous organoids connected through multiple print locations.ResultsWe demonstrate that as few as 10 cells can be used to form 3D mammary structures in a single print and that prints up to 500 μm apart can fuse to form single large structures. Using these fusion parameters, we demonstrate that both linear and non-linear (contiguous circles) can be generated with sizes of 3 mm in length/diameter. We confirm that cells from individual prints interact to form structures with a contiguous lumen. Finally, we demonstrate that organoids can be printed into human collagen hydrogels, allowing for all-human 3D culture systems.ConclusionsOur platform is adaptable to different culturing protocols and is superior to traditional random 3D culture techniques in efficiency, reproducibility, and scalability. Importantly, owing to the low-cost accessibility and computer numerical control–driven platform of our 3D bioprinter, we have the ability to disseminate our experiments with absolute precision to interested laboratories.

[1]  Albert Jin,et al.  Local 3D matrix microenvironment regulates cell migration through spatiotemporal dynamics of contractility-dependent adhesions , 2015, Nature Communications.

[2]  G. Davis,et al.  Outside in: inversion of cell polarity controls epithelial lumen formation. , 2014, Developmental cell.

[3]  R. D. Bruno,et al.  Notch-induced mammary tumorigenesis does not involve the lobule-limited epithelial progenitor , 2012, Oncogene.

[4]  Patrick C Sachs,et al.  Defining essential stem cell characteristics in adipose-derived stromal cells extracted from distinct anatomical sites , 2012, Cell and Tissue Research.

[5]  Patrick C Sachs,et al.  Tissue specific microenvironments: a key tool for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine , 2017, Journal of biological engineering.

[6]  Patrick C Sachs,et al.  Isolating adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells from lipoaspirate blood and saline fraction , 2010, Organogenesis.

[7]  R. D. Bruno,et al.  Paracrine-rescued lobulogenesis in chimeric outgrowths comprising progesterone-receptor-null mammary epithelium and redirected wild-type testicular cells , 2014, Journal of Cell Science.

[8]  M. Bissell,et al.  Apical polarity in three-dimensional culture systems: where to now? , 2010, Journal of biology.

[9]  Frederick Lanni,et al.  Internet-based image analysis quantifies contractile behavior of individual fibroblasts inside model tissue. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[10]  A. Manninen Epithelial polarity--generating and integrating signals from the ECM with integrins. , 2015, Experimental cell research.

[11]  A. Ranga,et al.  3D niche microarrays for systems-level analyses of cell fate , 2014, Nature Communications.

[12]  E. Dinsdale,et al.  Human mammary gland morphogenesis in vitro: the growth and differentiation of normal breast epithelium in collagen gel cultures defined by electron microscopy, monoclonal antibodies, and autoradiography. , 1983, Developmental biology.

[13]  Daniel H. Miller,et al.  Growth of human breast tissues from patient cells in 3D hydrogel scaffolds , 2016, Breast Cancer Research.

[14]  R. D. Bruno,et al.  The mouse mammary microenvironment redirects mesoderm-derived bone marrow cells to a mammary epithelial progenitor cell fate. , 2012, Stem cells and development.

[15]  Alejo E. Rodriguez-Fraticelli,et al.  Picking up the threads: extracellular matrix signals in epithelial morphogenesis. , 2014, Current opinion in cell biology.

[16]  Genee Y. Lee,et al.  Three-dimensional culture models of normal and malignant breast epithelial cells , 2007, Nature Methods.

[17]  John A Reid,et al.  Accessible bioprinting: adaptation of a low-cost 3D-printer for precise cell placement and stem cell differentiation , 2016, Biofabrication.

[18]  K. Billiar,et al.  Nonlinear strain stiffening is not sufficient to explain how far cells can feel on fibrous protein gels. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Patricia J. Keely,et al.  Use of three-dimensional collagen gels to study mechanotransduction in T47D breast epithelial cells , 2005, Biological Procedures Online.

[20]  Klod Kokini,et al.  Fibril microstructure affects strain transmission within collagen extracellular matrices. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  A K Harris,et al.  Connective tissue morphogenesis by fibroblast traction. I. Tissue culture observations. , 1982, Developmental biology.

[22]  Guanqing Ou,et al.  A 3D tension bioreactor platform to study the interplay between ECM stiffness and tumor phenotype. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.

[23]  Shawn P. Carey,et al.  Three-dimensional collagen matrix induces a mechanosensitive invasive epithelial phenotype , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Carlos Sonnenschein,et al.  The role of collagen reorganization on mammary epithelial morphogenesis in a 3D culture model. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[25]  Ana M Soto,et al.  A novel 3D in vitro culture model to study stromal-epithelial interactions in the mammary gland. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[26]  S. V. van IJzendoorn,et al.  Mechanisms of apical-basal axis orientation and epithelial lumen positioning. , 2015, Trends in cell biology.

[27]  H. Martinson,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Composition Reveals Complex and Dynamic Stromal-Epithelial Interactions in the Mammary Gland , 2010, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[28]  J. Sturgis,et al.  Factors necessary to produce basoapical polarity in human glandular epithelium formed in conventional and high-throughput three-dimensional culture: example of the breast epithelium , 2009, BMC Biology.

[29]  J. Emerman,et al.  Maintenance and induction of morphological differentiation in dissociated mammary epithelium on floating collagen membranes , 1977, In Vitro.

[30]  Xu Wang,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells in mammary adipose tissue stimulate progression of breast cancer resembling the basal-type , 2012, Cancer biology & therapy.

[31]  Radhika Desai,et al.  ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Quantification of regenerative potential in primary human mammary epithelial cells , 2015, Development.

[33]  Keith E. Mostov,et al.  Building epithelial architecture: insights from three-dimensional culture models , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[34]  R. D. Bruno,et al.  Embryonic Stem Cells Are Redirected to Non-Tumorigenic Epithelial Cell Fate by Interaction with the Mammary Microenvironment , 2013, PloS one.

[35]  Alberto Saiani,et al.  3D cell bioprinting of self-assembling peptide-based hydrogels , 2017 .

[36]  M J Bissell,et al.  Functional differentiation and alveolar morphogenesis of primary mammary cultures on reconstituted basement membrane. , 1989, Development.

[37]  J. Zallen,et al.  Translating cell polarity into tissue elongation. , 2011, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[38]  S. Yonemura Differential Sensitivity of Epithelial Cells to Extracellular Matrix in Polarity Establishment , 2014, PloS one.

[39]  A. Kabla,et al.  Gap geometry dictates epithelial closure efficiency , 2015, Nature Communications.

[40]  B. Ladoux,et al.  Mechanics of epithelial tissues during gap closure. , 2016, Current opinion in cell biology.

[41]  M. Baker 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility , 2016, Nature.

[42]  M. Glukhova,et al.  How integrins control breast biology☆ , 2013, Current opinion in cell biology.

[43]  R. D. Bruno,et al.  Reprogramming non-mammary and cancer cells in the developing mouse mammary gland. , 2012, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[44]  R. D. Bruno,et al.  Mammary extracellular matrix directs differentiation of testicular and embryonic stem cells to form functional mammary glands in vivo , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[45]  C. Sonnenschein,et al.  Breast epithelial tissue morphology is affected in 3D cultures by species-specific collagen-based extracellular matrix. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.