Rigid Fusion After Cloward Operation for Cervical Disc Disease Using Autograft, Allograft, or Xenograft: A Randomized Study With Radiostereometric and Clinical Follow-Up Assessment

Study Design. In this study, 43 patients scheduled for a single-level cervical Cloward procedure for disc disease were randomized prospectively to fusion with autograft, allograft, or xenograft. Objective. To outline any differences in fusion over time in terms of final mobility and clinical outcome between the three bone grafts. Summary of Background Data. Fusion is used to relieve pain from a spinal segment. The bovine xenograft gives a fibrous fusion in contrast to the solid bone fusion obtained with autograft from the iliac crest, but no definite differences in clinical outcome have been shown previously after surgery at a single level. Methods. By use of radiostereometric analysis, 33 patients were observed after 6, 12, and 24 to 50 (mean, 37) months. All 43 patients underwent clinical examination, which involved pain rating before and after surgery, with a final follow-up assessment by an unbiased observer. Results. Mobility could be demonstrated in 9 patients after 1 year and in 6 patients at the final follow-up assessment, without pain, and with no difference between bone grafts. The patients who received autograft experienced a greater reduction of pain than the patients treated with xenograft. Conclusions. Most of the patients healed with a rigid fusion no matter which graft was used, but the healing process took longer than expected. The clinical results were not influenced by whether mobility could be demonstrated. There was a tendency toward better clinical results in the patients treated with autograft.

[1]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  One-level cervical spine fusion. A randomized study, with or without plate fixation, using radiostereometry in 27 patients. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[2]  John R. Johnson,et al.  The Effect of Postoperative Nonsteroidal Anti‐inflammatory Drug Administration on Spinal Fusion , 1998, Spine.

[3]  D. E. Jackson,et al.  Outcome Analysis of Noninstrumented Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion in 348 Patients , 1998, Spine.

[4]  M. Hadley,et al.  Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogeneic and allogeneic bone graft substrate: a prospective comparative analysis. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  V. Goel,et al.  ▪ Spinal Motion After Cervical Fusion: In Vivo Assessment with Roentgen Stereophotogrammetry , 1994, Spine.

[6]  V. Goel,et al.  In vivo kinematics of the cervical spine. Part I: Development of a roentgen stereophotogrammetric technique using metallic markers and assessment of its accuracy. , 1993, Journal of spinal disorders.

[7]  M. N. Bucci,et al.  Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion in a community hospital setting. , 1993, Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association.

[8]  D. Kunz,et al.  Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparison of Techniques in an Animal Model , 1992, Spine.

[9]  T. Ducker,et al.  The Use of Freeze-Dried Allograft Bone for Anterior Cervical Fusions , 1991, Spine.

[10]  G Selvik,et al.  Mobility of the Lower Lumbar Spine After Posterolateral Fusion Determined by Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis , 1990, Spine.

[11]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Review of orthopedic applications. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  G. Selvik,et al.  Mobility in the lumbosacral spine after fusion studied with the aid of roentgen stereophotogrammetry. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  Rosomoff Hl,et al.  Human cadaver femoral head homografts for anterior cervical spine fusions , 1977 .

[14]  M. Brown,et al.  A roentgenographic evaluation of frozen allografts versus autografts in anterior cervical spine fusions. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  P S Ramani,et al.  Cervical spinal interbody fusion with Kiel bone , 1975, The British journal of surgery.

[16]  R. Hardy,et al.  Relief of pain by anterior cervical-spine fusion for spondylosis. A report of sixty-five patients. , 1973, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  R. B. Cloward The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. , 1958, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  B. Levander,et al.  Bone graft should not be omitted in cloward procedure for cervical radiculopathy , 1998 .

[19]  M. N. Bucci,et al.  Successful fusion using allogeneic bone graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. , 1998, Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association.

[20]  F. Muñoz,et al.  Comparison of three techniques of anterior fusion in single-level cervical disc herniation , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[21]  F. Reinholt,et al.  Comparative Vascular Evaluation by Mri of Autologous and Bovine Grafts , 1993 .

[22]  G. Selvik Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[23]  L Ryd,et al.  Micromotion in knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of tibial component fixation. , 1986, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[24]  Leif Ryd,et al.  Micromotion in knee arthroplasty , 1986 .

[25]  C. Sutton,et al.  Human cadaver femoral head homografts for anterior cervical spine fusions. , 1977, Surgical neurology.

[26]  S. Canale,et al.  Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration. , 1972, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.