An Overview of the ATSC 3.0 Physical Layer Specification

This paper provides an overview of the physical layer specification of Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) 3.0, the next-generation digital terrestrial broadcasting standard. ATSC 3.0 does not have any backwards-compatibility constraint with existing ATSC standards, and it uses orthogonal frequency division multiplexing-based waveforms along with powerful low-density parity check (LDPC) forward error correction codes similar to existing state-of-the-art. However, it introduces many new technological features such as 2-D non-uniform constellations, improved and ultra-robust LDPC codes, power-based layered division multiplexing to efficiently provide mobile and fixed services in the same radio frequency (RF) channel, as well as a novel frequency pre-distortion multiple-input single-output antenna scheme. ATSC 3.0 also allows bonding of two RF channels to increase the service peak data rate and to exploit inter-RF channel frequency diversity, and to employ dual-polarized multiple-input multiple-output antenna system. Furthermore, ATSC 3.0 provides great flexibility in terms of configuration parameters (e.g., 12 coding rates, 6 modulation orders, 16 pilot patterns, 12 guard intervals, and 2 time interleavers), and also a very flexible data multiplexing scheme using time, frequency, and power dimensions. As a consequence, ATSC 3.0 not only improves the spectral efficiency and robustness well beyond the first generation ATSC broadcast television standard, but also it is positioned to become the reference terrestrial broadcasting technology worldwide due to its unprecedented performance and flexibility. Another key aspect of ATSC 3.0 is its extensible signaling, which will allow including new technologies in the future without disrupting ATSC 3.0 services. This paper provides an overview of the physical layer technologies of ATSC 3.0, covering the ATSC A/321 standard that describes the so-called bootstrap, which is the universal entry point to an ATSC 3.0 signal, and the ATSC A/322 standard that describes the physical layer downlink signals after the bootstrap. A summary comparison between ATSC 3.0 and DVB-T2 is also provided.

[1]  David Barquero,et al.  Next Generation Mobile Broadcasting , 2013 .

[2]  Sung Ik Park,et al.  Low Complexity Layered Division Multiplexing for ATSC 3.0 , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[3]  Kyung-Joong Kim,et al.  Low-Density Parity-Check Codes for ATSC 3.0 , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[4]  Sung Ik Park,et al.  System Discovery and Signaling Transmission Using Bootstrap in ATSC 3.0 , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[5]  Lothar Stadelmeier,et al.  Channel Bonding for ATSC3.0 , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[6]  David Gomez-Barquero,et al.  Layered Division Multiplexing With Multi-Radio-Frequency Channel Technologies , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[7]  Yiyan Wu,et al.  FOBTV: Worldwide Efforts in Developing Next-Generation Broadcasting System , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[8]  David Gomez-Barquero,et al.  DVB-T2: The Second Generation of Terrestrial Digital Video Broadcasting System , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[9]  Lachlan Michael,et al.  The ATSC Link-layer Protocol (ALP): Design and Efficiency Evaluation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[10]  Hakju Lee,et al.  Physical Layer Framing for ATSC 3.0 , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[11]  David Gomez-Barquero,et al.  Broadcast television spectrum incentive auctions in the u.s.: trends, challenges, and opportunities , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  David Gomez-Barquero,et al.  Bit-Interleaved Coded Modulation (BICM) for ATSC 3.0 , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[13]  Jörg Robert,et al.  DVB-T2 MISO field measurements and a calibrated coverage gain predictor , 2012, IEEE international Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting.

[14]  Takuya Shitomi,et al.  8K Terrestrial Transmission Field Tests Using Dual-Polarized MIMO and Higher-Order Modulation OFDM , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[15]  David Gomez-Barquero,et al.  LDM Versus FDM/TDM for Unequal Error Protection in Terrestrial Broadcasting Systems: An Information-Theoretic View , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[16]  David Gomez-Barquero,et al.  MIMO for DVB-NGH, the next generation mobile TV broadcasting [Accepted From Open Call] , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[17]  Sung Ik Park,et al.  LDM Core Services Performance in ATSC 3.0 , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[18]  David Gomez-Barquero,et al.  Transmit Diversity Code Filter Sets (TDCFSs), an MISO Antenna Frequency Predistortion Scheme for ATSC 3.0 , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[19]  Mark Aitken,et al.  An Overview of the North American ATSC M/H Mobile Broadcasting System and Its Next-Generation ATSC 3.0 , 2013 .

[20]  Sung Ik Park,et al.  Non-Uniform Constellations for ATSC 3.0 , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[21]  Xianbin Wang,et al.  Layered-Division-Multiplexing: Theory and Practice , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[22]  David Gomez-Barquero,et al.  MIMO for ATSC 3.0 , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[23]  Vittoria Mignone,et al.  DVB-NGH: The Next Generation of Digital Broadcast Services to Handheld Devices , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[24]  Feng Yang,et al.  Dedicated Return Channel for ATSC 3.0 , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[25]  David Gomez-Barquero,et al.  Physical Layer Time Interleaving for the ATSC 3.0 System , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.