Minimal and adaptive numerical strategy for critical resource planning in a pandemic.

Current epidemiological models can in principle model the temporal evolution of a pandemic. However, any such model will rely on parameters that are unknown, which in practice are estimated using stochastic and poorly measured quantities. As a result, an early prediction of the long-term evolution of a pandemic will quickly lose relevance, while a late model will be too late to be useful for disaster management. Unless a model is designed to be adaptive, it is bound either to lose relevance over time, or lose trust and thus not have a second chance for retraining. We propose a strategy for estimating the number of infections and the number of deaths, that does away with time-series modeling, and instead makes use of a "phase portrait approach." We demonstrate that, with this approach, there is a universality to the evolution of the disease across countries, that can then be used to make reliable predictions. These same models can also be used to plan the requirements for critical resources during the pandemic. The approach is designed for simplicity of interpretation, and adaptivity over time. Using our model, we predict the number of infections and deaths in Italy and New York State, based on an adaptive algorithm which uses early available data, and show that our predictions closely match the actual outcomes. We also carry out a similar exercise for India, where in addition to projecting the number of infections and deaths, we also project the expected range of critical resource requirements for hospitalizations in a location.

[1]  Benjamin J Cowling,et al.  Real-time tentative assessment of the epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus infections in Wuhan, China, as at 22 January 2020 , 2020, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[2]  M. Prakash,et al.  A Very Flat Peak: Exponential growth phase of COVID-19 is mostly followed by a prolonged linear growth phase, not an immediate saturation , 2020, medRxiv.

[3]  J. Hyman,et al.  Real-time forecasts of the 2019-nCoV epidemic in China from February 5th to February 24th, 2020 , 2020, 2002.05069.

[4]  E. Dong,et al.  An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[5]  B. Singer,et al.  Impact of international travel and border control measures on the global spread of the novel 2019 coronavirus outbreak , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Ruiyun Li,et al.  Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) , 2020, Science.

[7]  Jessica T Davis,et al.  The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak , 2020, Science.

[8]  C. Murray Forecasting the impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital demand and deaths for the USA and European Economic Area countries , 2020, medRxiv.

[9]  S. Lo,et al.  A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster , 2020, The Lancet.

[10]  P. Klepac,et al.  Early dynamics of transmission and control of COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[11]  W. O. Kermack,et al.  A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics , 1927 .

[12]  Kai Kupferschmidt,et al.  Countries test tactics in 'war' against COVID-19. , 2020, Science.

[13]  Neil M. Ferguson,et al.  The effect of public health measures on the 1918 influenza pandemic in U.S. cities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. Lipsitch,et al.  Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.