Relative numerosity as a dimension of stimulus control: The peak shift

[1]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Handbook of Operant Behavior , 2022 .

[2]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Sequential stimuli and relative numerosity discriminations in pigeons , 1991 .

[3]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Discrimination of relative numerosity by pigeons , 1989 .

[4]  W. K. Honig,et al.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  H. S. Pennypacker,et al.  Positive and negative generalization gradients obtained after equivalent training conditions. , 1963 .

[6]  W. K. Honig.  Prediction of preference, transposition, and transposition-reversal from the generalization gradient. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  H. M. Jenkins,et al.  Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  H. M. Hanson.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Differential effects of continuous extinction and discrimination training on the generalization gradient. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  K. Spence.  The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. , 1937 .

[11]  E. J. Capaldi,et al.  The Development of numerical competence : animal and human models , 1993 .

[12]  W. K. Honig.  Discrimination by pigeons of mixture and uniformity in arrays of stimulus elements. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[13]  N. Guttman,et al.  Discriminability and stimulus generalization. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Carl G. Hempel,et al.  Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science , 1952 .