Network connectivity: Stochastic vs. deterministic wireless channels

We study the effect of stochastic wireless channel models on the connectivity of ad hoc networks. Unlike in the deterministic geometric disk model where nodes connect if they are within a certain distance from each other, stochastic models attempt to capture small-scale fading effects due to shadowing and multipath received signals. Through analysis of local and global network observables, we present conclusive evidence suggesting that network behaviour is highly dependent upon whether a stochastic or deterministic connection model is employed. Specifically we show that the network mean degree is lower (higher) for stochastic wireless channels than for deterministic ones, if the path loss exponent is greater (lesser) than the spatial dimension. Similarly, the probability of forming isolated pairs of nodes in an otherwise dense random network is much less for stochastic wireless channels than for deterministic ones. The latter realisation explains why the upper bound of k-connectivity is tighter for stochastic wireless channels. We obtain closed form analytic results and compare to extensive numerical simulations.

[1]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[2]  Christian Bettstetter,et al.  On the Connectivity of Ad Hoc Networks , 2004, Comput. J..

[3]  T. Mattfeldt Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1996 .

[4]  Matti Latva-aho,et al.  Ultra-wide band sensor networks in oil and gas explorations , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Justin P. Coon,et al.  k-connectivity for confined random networks , 2013, ArXiv.

[6]  Stephen Farrell,et al.  DTN: an architectural retrospective , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Christian Bettstetter,et al.  Connectivity of Wireless Multihop Networks in a Shadow Fading Environment , 2003, MSWIM '03.

[8]  Justin P. Coon,et al.  Full Connectivity: Corners, Edges and Faces , 2012, ArXiv.

[9]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  New analytical models and probability density functions for fading in wireless communications , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[10]  Daniele Miorandi The Impact of Channel Randomness on Coverage and Connectivity of Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Dharma P. Agrawal,et al.  Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: Theory and Applications , 2006 .

[12]  Xiangyun Zhou,et al.  Connectivity of ad hoc networks: Is fading good or bad? , 2008, 2008 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems.

[13]  J. Dall,et al.  Random geometric graphs. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[15]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Stochastic geometry and random graphs for the analysis and design of wireless networks , 2009, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[16]  Mathew D. Penrose,et al.  On k-connectivity for a geometric random graph , 1999, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[17]  David Tse,et al.  Fundamentals of Wireless Communication , 2005 .

[18]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  The Number of Neighbors Needed for Connectivity of Wireless Networks , 2004, Wirel. Networks.

[19]  Paolo Santi Topology control in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks , 2005 .

[20]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1989 .