Systolic Improvement and Mechanical Resynchronization Does Not Require Electrical Synchrony in the Dilated Failing Heart With Left Bundle-Branch Block

Background—Biventricular (BiV) and left ventricular (LV) pacing similarly augment systolic function in left bundle-branch block (LBBB)-failing hearts despite different electrical activation. We tested whether electrical synchrony is required to achieve mechanical synchronization and functional benefit from pacing. Methods and Results—Epicardial mapping, tagged MRI, and hemodynamics were obtained in dogs with LBBB-failing hearts during right atrial, LV, and BiV stimulation. BiV and LV both significantly improved chamber hemodynamics (eg, 25% increase in dP/dtmax and aortic pulse pressure) compared with atrial pacing-LBBB, and this improvement correlated with mechanical resynchronization. Electrical dispersion, however, decreased 13% with BiV but increased 23% with LV pacing (P <0.01). Conclusion—Improved mechanical synchrony and function do not require electrical synchrony. Mechanical coordination plays the dominant role in global systolic improvement with either pacing approach.

[1]  R. O'rourke,et al.  Effect of alteration of left ventricular activation sequence on the left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relation in closed-chest dogs. , 1985, Circulation research.

[2]  J. Blanc,et al.  Evaluation of different ventricular pacing sites in patients with severe heart failure: results of an acute hemodynamic study. , 1997, Circulation.

[3]  H. Halperin,et al.  Imaging asynchronous mechanical activation of the paced heart with tagged MRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  AngeloAuricchio,et al.  Effect of Pacing Chamber and Atrioventricular Delay on Acute Systolic Function of Paced Patients With Congestive Heart Failure , 1999 .

[5]  C. H. Chen,et al.  Improved left ventricular mechanics from acute VDD pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction delay. , 1999, Circulation.

[6]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Mapping propagation of mechanical activation in the paced heart with MRI tagging. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[7]  J. Daubert,et al.  Electrocardiographic predictive factors of long-term clinical improvement with multisite biventricular pacing in advanced heart failure. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  J. Blanc,et al.  Evaluation of left ventricular based pacing in patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Four-dimensional B-spline based motion analysis of tagged MR images: introduction and in vivo validation. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Gregory S. Nelson,et al.  Left Ventricular or Biventricular Pacing Improves Cardiac Function at Diminished Energy Cost in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Left Bundle-Branch Block , 2000, Circulation.

[11]  J. Blanc,et al.  Long-term left ventricular pacing: assessment and comparison with biventricular pacing in patients with severe congestive heart failure. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  J. Daubert,et al.  Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Erez Nevo,et al.  Quantitation of basal dyssynchrony and acute resynchronization from left or biventricular pacing by novel echo-contrast variability imaging. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Stefan Sack,et al.  Long-term clinical effect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.