Strip cropping in organically managed vegetable systems: agronomic and environmental effects

Abstract This study evaluated the agro-environmental and economic effectiveness of strips introduced in a diversified organic vegetable system. Two experiments of three experimental years (2018, 2019, 2020) were carried out within the 4-year rotation of MOnsampolo VEgetable organic Long-Term Experiment (MOVE LTE) in Central Italy to test strip cropping vs pure stand. The crop combinations in the two experiments were faba bean (Vicia faba L.)–tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) and common wheat (Triticum aestivum)–zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.). We determined the productive and economic performances, disease and weed control, nutritional differences and effectiveness in returning carbon to the soil. The two strip cropping systems allowed a better use of resources, enhancing plant biomass and crop residues, particularly for tomato (+24%) and zucchini (+63%). However, the greater plant biomass did not always result in an increase in crop yields. For example, while the wheat–zucchini strip system showed a land equivalent ratio >1 in all three experimental years with a high yield performance in zucchini (+54% of yield), the faba bean–tomato system was more productive in strips only in 2018. On the contrary, this latter system contributed a carbon return >1 in all three experimental years. No significant differences between strip and pure stand systems were observed for fusarium (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici) and oidium (Oidium spp.) diseases on tomato and zucchini crops, respectively, and for weed control. Lastly, greater labor costs associated in both experiments did not affect their profitability (+21% and +319% in faba bean–tomato and wheat–zucchini experiments, respectively). Overall, our findings pointed out that farmers could increase sustainability of their cropping systems with the introduction of a well-designed strip cropping system, which can lead to the reduction of economic risks, greater potential soil carbon and more efficient use of resources on the same land.

[1]  Tchetin Kazak European Green Deal , 2022, Yearbook of the Law Department.

[2]  H. Kristensen,et al.  The concurrent assessment of agronomic, ecological and environmental variables enables better choice of agroecological service crop termination management , 2022, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[3]  E. Noris,et al.  A Review of the Most Common and Economically Important Diseases That Undermine the Cultivation of Tomato Crop in the Mediterranean Basin , 2021, Agronomy.

[4]  A. Messéan,et al.  ENABLING CROP DIVERSIFICATION TO SUPPORT TRANSITIONS TOWARD MORE SUSTAINABLE EUROPEAN AGRIFOOD SYSTEMS , 2021, Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering.

[5]  Hassan Hanan Aref,et al.  Biology and Integrated Control of Tomato Wilt Caused by Fusarium oxysporum lycopersici: A Comprehensive Review under the Light of Recent Advancements , 2020 .

[6]  H. Kristensen,et al.  Agroecological service crops managed with roller crimper reduce weed density and weed species richness in organic vegetable systems across Europe , 2019, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[7]  A. Datta,et al.  Carbon mineralization in soil as influenced by crop residue type and placement in an Alfisols of Northwest India , 2019, Carbon management.

[8]  G. Robinson Globalization of Agriculture , 2018, Annual Review of Resource Economics.

[9]  H. Kaul,et al.  Productivity and nutrient use efficiency with integrated fertilization of buckwheat–fenugreek intercrops , 2018, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[10]  Jeffrey Sayer,et al.  Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries , 2017 .

[11]  R. Domínguez‐Perles,et al.  Evaluation of vegetable-faba bean (Vicia faba L.) intercropping under Latvian agro-ecological conditions. , 2017, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[12]  Bernard Rosner,et al.  Wilcoxon Rank-Based Tests for Clustered Data with R Package clusrank , 2017, J. Stat. Softw..

[13]  F. Léger,et al.  A conceptual framework for alternative farmers’ strategic choices: the case of French organic market gardening microfarms , 2016 .

[14]  D. Makowski,et al.  Temporal niche differentiation increases the land equivalent ratio of annual intercrops: A meta-analysis , 2015 .

[15]  Jan Vos,et al.  The contribution of phenotypic plasticity to complementary light capture in plant mixtures. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[16]  E. Justes,et al.  How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: a review , 2015, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[17]  Cathy Hawes,et al.  Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[18]  David Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity and overyielding: insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[19]  M. A. A. El-Gai,et al.  Effects of Intercropping System of Tomato and Common Bean on Growth, Yield Components and Land Equivalent Ratio in New Valley Governorate , 2014 .

[20]  E. Testani,et al.  Conservation tillage strategy based on the roller crimper technology for weed control in Mediterranean vegetable organic cropping systems , 2013 .

[21]  M. Boudreau,et al.  Diseases in intercropping systems. , 2013, Annual review of phytopathology.

[22]  U. Köpke,et al.  Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) intercropped with oil crops – a strategy to enhance rooting density and to optimize nitrogen use and grain production? , 2012 .

[23]  S. Canali,et al.  Crop Production and Environmental Effects in Conventional and Organic Vegetable Farming Systems: The Case of a Long-Term Experiment in Mediterranean Conditions (Central Italy) , 2012 .

[24]  S. Dong,et al.  Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system , 2011 .

[25]  B. Lin Resilience in Agriculture through Crop Diversification: Adaptive Management for Environmental Change , 2011 .

[26]  B. Tivoli,et al.  Effect and underlying mechanisms of pea-cereal intercropping on the epidemic development of ascochyta blight , 2010, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[27]  E. Justes,et al.  Dynamic analysis of competition and complementarity for light and N use to understand the yield and the protein content of a durum wheat–winter pea intercrop , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[28]  M. Jeuffroy,et al.  Agronomic Analysis of the Performance of Spring and winter cereal-legume Intercrops in Organic Farming , 2009 .

[29]  .. J.P.Ouma,et al.  Cropping system influences Tomato spotted wilt virus disease development, thrips population and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) , 2008 .

[30]  W. Werf,et al.  Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton , 2008 .

[31]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[32]  L. Madden,et al.  Sampling for plant disease incidence. , 1999, Phytopathology.

[33]  P. Rosset,et al.  Agroecology versus input substitution: A fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture , 1997 .

[34]  P. Carberry,et al.  Resource capture and use in intercropping: solar radiation , 1993 .

[35]  P. Jacquard The ecology of intercropping , 1990 .

[36]  R. Mead,et al.  The Concept of a ‘Land Equivalent Ratio’ and Advantages in Yields from Intercropping , 1980, Experimental Agriculture.

[37]  R. W. Willey,et al.  A Competitive Ratio for Quantifying Competition Between Intercrops , 1980, Experimental Agriculture.

[38]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[39]  W. Rossing,et al.  Redefining the field to mobilize three-dimensional diversity and ecosystem services on the arable farm , 2021 .

[40]  M. Asif,et al.  Wheat-based intercropping: a review. , 2015 .

[41]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[42]  F. Celette,et al.  Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review , 2013, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[43]  Werner Zollitsch,et al.  Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: from structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[44]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Consequences of organic and non-organic farming practices for field, farm and landscape complexity , 2009 .

[45]  Wang Yuyan,et al.  Effects of different intercropping patterns on the growth of cucumber in greenhouse and soil environment. , 2009 .

[46]  I. Güvenç,et al.  Intercropping based on cauliflower: more productive, profitable and highly sustainable , 2005 .

[47]  M. Peet GREENHOUSE CROP STRESS MANAGEMENT , 1999 .

[48]  J. Theunissen Application of Intercropping in Organic Agriculture , 1997 .

[49]  C. A. Francis,et al.  Resource use by intercrops. , 1986 .

[50]  M. Krom,et al.  Spectrophotometric determination of ammonia: a study of a modified Berthelot reaction using salicylate and dichloroisocyanurate , 1980 .

[51]  R. W. Willey Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32 , 1979 .

[52]  A. Henriksen,et al.  Automatic methods for determining nitrate and nitrite in water and soil extracts , 1970 .

[53]  H. Levene Robust tests for equality of variances , 1961 .