Generation of hybrid sinograms for the recovery of kV-CT images with metal artifacts for helical tomotherapy.

PURPOSE The overall goal of this study is to restore kilovoltage computed tomography (kV-CT) images which are disfigured by patients' metal prostheses. By generating a hybrid sinogram that is a combination of kV and megavoltage (MV) projection data, the authors suggest a novel metal artifact-reduction (MAR) method that retains the image quality to match that of kV-CT and simultaneously restores the information of metal prostheses lost due to photon starvation. METHODS CT projection data contain information about attenuation coefficients and the total length of the attenuation. By normalizing raw kV projections with their own total lengths of attenuation, mean attenuation projections were obtained. In the same manner, mean density projections of MV-CT were obtained by the normalization of MV projections resulting from the forward projection of density-calibrated MV-CT images with the geometric parameters of the kV-CT device. To generate the hybrid sinogram, metal-affected signals of the kV sinogram were identified and replaced by the corresponding signals of the MV sinogram following a density calibration step with kV data. Filtered backprojection was implemented to reconstruct the hybrid CT image. To validate the authors' approach, they simulated four different scenarios for three heads and one pelvis using metallic rod inserts within a cylindrical phantom. Five inserts describing human body elements were also included in the phantom. The authors compared the image qualities among the kV, MV, and hybrid CT images by measuring the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the densities of all inserts, and the spatial resolution. In addition, the MAR performance was compared among three existing MAR methods and the authors' hybrid method. Finally, for clinical trials, the authors produced hybrid images of three patients having dental metal prostheses to compare their MAR performances with those of the kV, MV, and three existing MAR methods. RESULTS The authors compared the image quality and MAR performance of the hybrid method with those of other imaging modalities and the three MAR methods, respectively. The total measured mean of the CNR (SNR) values for the nonmetal inserts was determined to be 14.3 (35.3), 15.3 (37.8), and 25.5 (64.3) for the kV, MV, and hybrid images, respectively, and the spatial resolutions of the hybrid images were similar to those of the kV images. The measured densities of the metal and nonmetal inserts in the hybrid images were in good agreement with their true densities, except in cases of extremely low densities, such as air and lung. Using the hybrid method, major streak artifacts were suitably removed and no secondary artifacts were introduced in the resultant image. In clinical trials, the authors verified that kV and MV projections were successfully combined and turned into the resultant hybrid image with high image contrast, accurate metal information, and few metal artifacts. The hybrid method also outperformed the three existing MAR methods with regard to metal information restoration and secondary artifact prevention. CONCLUSIONS The authors have shown that the hybrid method can restore the overall image quality of kV-CT disfigured by severe metal artifacts and restore the information of metal prostheses lost due to photon starvation. The hybrid images may allow for the improved delineation of structures of interest and accurate dose calculations for radiation treatment planning for patients with metal prostheses.

[1]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Performance characterization of megavoltage computed tomography imaging on a helical tomotherapy unit. , 2005, Medical physics.

[3]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Model-Based Tomographic Reconstruction of Objects Containing Known Components , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Mehran Yazdi,et al.  An adaptive approach to metal artifact reduction in helical computed tomography for radiation therapy treatment planning: experimental and clinical studies. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Guang-Hong Chen,et al.  Streaking artifacts reduction in four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[6]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Generation of virtual monochromatic CBCT from dual kV∕MV beam projections. , 2013, Medical physics.

[7]  B G Fallone,et al.  Evaluation of normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in kVCT using MVCT prior images for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2013, Medical physics.

[8]  Thorsten M. Buzug,et al.  Spurious structures created by interpolation-based CT metal artifact reduction , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[9]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Shading correction for on-board cone-beam CT in radiation therapy using planning MDCT images. , 2010, Medical physics.

[10]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Megavoltage cone-beam CT: system description and clinical applications. , 2006, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[11]  W. Kalender,et al.  Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. , 1987 .

[12]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  A simple approach to measure computed tomography (CT) modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise-power spectrum (NPS) using the American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom. , 2013, Medical physics.

[13]  Satyapal Rathee,et al.  Clinical evaluation of normalized metal artifact reduction in kVCT using MVCT prior images (MVCT-NMAR) for radiation therapy treatment planning. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  S. Hui,et al.  Assessing prostate, bladder and rectal doses during image guided radiation therapy — need for plan adaptation? , 2009, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[15]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .

[16]  J Pouliot,et al.  The use of megavoltage cone-beam CT to complement CT for target definition in pelvic radiotherapy in the presence of hip replacement. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  A novel forward projection-based metal artifact reduction method for flat-detector computed tomography , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  R. Siddon Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. , 1985, Medical physics.

[19]  Denis Laurendeau,et al.  An algorithm for efficient metal artifact reductions in permanent seed. , 2010, Medical physics.

[20]  Lei Dong,et al.  Reducing metal artifacts in cone-beam CT images by preprocessing projection data. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Hengyong Yu,et al.  A segmentation-based method for metal artifact reduction. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[22]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  An algorithm for the reduction of metal clip artifacts in CT reconstructions. , 1981 .

[23]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  X-ray CT Metal Artifact Reduction Using Wavelet Domain $L_{0}$ Sparse Regularization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  A technique for on-board CT reconstruction using both kilovoltage and megavoltage beam projections for 3D treatment verification. , 2005, Medical physics.

[25]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Frequency split metal artifact reduction (FSMAR) in computed tomography. , 2012, Medical physics.

[26]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  High energy x-ray phase contrast CT using glancing-angle grating interferometers. , 2014, Medical physics.

[27]  G. Glover,et al.  An algorithm for the reduction of metal clip artifacts in CT reconstructions. , 1981, Medical physics.

[28]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  A performance comparison of flat-panel imager-based MV and kV cone-beam CT. , 2002, Medical physics.

[29]  G H Olivera,et al.  The use of megavoltage CT (MVCT) images for dose recomputations , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[31]  T. Mackie,et al.  Megavoltage CT on a tomotherapy system. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Rebecca Fahrig,et al.  Metal artifact correction for x-ray computed tomography using kV and selective MV imaging. , 2014, Medical physics.

[33]  D. Fleischmann,et al.  Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography. , 2011, Radiology.

[34]  L. Xing,et al.  Metal artifact reduction in x-ray computed tomography (CT) by constrained optimization. , 2011, Medical physics.

[35]  S. Zhao,et al.  X-ray CT metal artifact reduction using wavelets: an application for imaging total hip prostheses , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. , 2010, Medical physics.

[37]  S. Yartsev,et al.  kVCT, MVCT, and hybrid CT image studies-Treatment planning and dose delivery equivalence on helical tomotherapy. , 2010, Medical physics.