Multi-objective Artificial Bee Colony in Mode Separation of Guided Waves for Scatting Coefficient Matrix Reconstruction

Ultrasonic sparse array which derived from phased array can control the aperture and overcome local area detection. It has simple configuration and has characteristics of large scanning range and high detection accuracy, which is one of the most promising applications of ultrasonic nondestructive testing technology. Scattering wave received by sparse array includes useful information of defects, such as location, shape and specific characteristics. However, scattering guided wave with multimode behavior will increasing complexity of scattering patterns. Methods using multi-mode signals are more adaptable than using single mode signals which generated by special transducer array. In order to utilize scattering coefficient matrix (SCM) method for defects identification, multi-mode separation technique is applied. This paper proposed a Multi-Objects Artificial Bee Colony (MOABC) method to separate modes and reconstruct SCM. First, sparse array signals are decomposed into different modes under a strategy of multi parameter objects optimization, which cannot achieved by means of traditional mode separation method only using symmetry for SCM. MOABC is then modified to improve boundary conditions of food source and enlarging changing elements of parameter vector for onlooker bees. Finally, mode separation is achieved and reconstructed mode is used to for new SCM. Sparse array guided wave is applied to homogeneous materials with through-hole defect. Both simulation and experiment results are discussed. Results show that MOABC algorithm can estimate characteristic parameters more accurate and more adaptable to reconstruct scattering coefficient matrix without symmetry.

[1]  Richard L. Weaver,et al.  Temperature dependence of diffuse field phase , 1999, Ultrasonics.

[2]  P.D. Wilcox,et al.  On the development and testing of a guided ultrasonic wave array for structural integrity monitoring , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  P. Wilcox,et al.  Defect characterization using an ultrasonic array to measure the scattering coefficient matrix , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  S. Salamone,et al.  Damage localization in metallic plate structures using edge-reflected lamb waves , 2016 .

[5]  Fabrizio Scarpa,et al.  Structural health monitoring using scanning laser vibrometry: III. Lamb waves for fatigue crack detection , 2004 .

[6]  J. Michaels Detection, localization and characterization of damage in plates with an in situ array of spatially distributed ultrasonic sensors , 2008 .

[7]  J. Saniie,et al.  Modeling and Parameter Estimation of Ultrasonic Backscattered Echoes , 1996 .

[8]  Darryll J. Pines,et al.  Directional piezoelectric phased array filters for detecting damage in isotropic plates , 2004 .

[9]  Ajay Raghavan,et al.  Guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2007 .

[10]  P. Cawley,et al.  The low-frequency reflection and scattering of the S0 Lamb mode from a circular through-thickness hole in a plate: Finite Element, analytical and experimental studies. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2007 .

[12]  J. B. Harley,et al.  Scale transform signal processing for optimal ultrasonic temperature compensation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  AN IDEA BASED ON HONEY BEE SWARM FOR NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATION , 2005 .

[14]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm , 2007, J. Glob. Optim..

[15]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Guided wave SHM with a distributed sensor network , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[16]  Sang Jun Lee,et al.  Load-Differential Imaging for Detection and Localization of Fatigue Cracks Using Lamb Waves (Preprint) , 2012 .

[17]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Strategies for guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  Steven E. Owens,et al.  Ultrasonic Lamb wave tomography in structural health monitoring , 2011 .

[19]  C Rouge,et al.  Directivity of guided ultrasonic wave scattering at notches and cracks , 2011 .

[20]  P. Fromme,et al.  Measurement of the scattering of a Lamb wave by a through hole in a plate. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Guided wave diffraction tomography within the born approximation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  Sam Kwong,et al.  Gbest-guided artificial bee colony algorithm for numerical function optimization , 2010, Appl. Math. Comput..

[23]  V. Giurgiutiu,et al.  In situ 2-D piezoelectric wafer active sensors arrays for guided wave damage detection. , 2008, Ultrasonics.

[24]  Xinlin Qing,et al.  Effect of adhesive on the performance of piezoelectric elements used to monitor structural health , 2006 .

[25]  N.K. M'Sirdi,et al.  Application of change detection technique to ultrasound signal processing. Use of spectral parametric estimation, time-frequency and wavelet , 1998, Proceedings of Thirtieth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory.

[26]  Alexander Velichko,et al.  Efficient frequency-domain finite element modeling of two-dimensional elastodynamic scattering. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.