Intra-Patient Anatomic Statistical Models for Adaptive Radiotherapy

A statistical issue of clinical importance is intra-patient variation from day to day. We use these probability densities for segmentation of daily images by posterior optimization of deformable models. However, the information on intra- patient variation is only available after the multiple days of imaging; yet the densities are needed for segmentation on each day. Still, each patient's anatomy and image properties are distinct. We describe an approach of using sample means over the days so far to describe a Frechet mean of the patient. We assume intra-patient variation is stationary across patients, so one can pool training statistics on residues from the mean of the respective patient. The approach is applied both to principal geodesic analysis of m-rep residues describing anatomic variation and to PCA of intensity quantile residues from model-relative regions. In trials to date, application of these statistics in segmentations of male pelvic organs from CT in adaptive radiotherapy yields results competitive with human segmentations and with segmentations based fully on intra-patient statistics.

[1]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology , 1999 .

[2]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  A statistical appearance model based on intensity quantile histograms , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[4]  Yongwon Jeong,et al.  Modeling Inter- and Intra-Patient Anatomical Variation Using a Bilinear Model , 2006, 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06).

[5]  Stephen M. Pizer,et al.  A Methodology for Constructing Geometric Priors and Likelihoods for Deformable Shape Models , 2006 .

[6]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Deformable M-Reps for 3D Medical Image Segmentation , 2003, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[7]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Medical Image Analysis: Progress over Two Decades and the Challenges Ahead , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Neighbor-constrained segmentation with level set based 3-D deformable models , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology , 1999 .

[10]  D. Kendall A Survey of the Statistical Theory of Shape , 1989 .

[11]  Martin Styner,et al.  Statistical Applications with Deformable M-Reps , 2008, Medial Representations.

[12]  Surajit Ray,et al.  Statistics on Anatomic Objects Reflecting Inter-Object Relations , 2006 .

[13]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Coupled Multi-shape Model and Mutual Information for Medical Image Segmentation , 2003, IPMI.

[14]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  A STATISTICAL APPEARANCE MODEL BASED ON INTENSITY QUANTILES , 2005 .

[15]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Appearance Models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[17]  U. Grenander,et al.  Statistical methods in computational anatomy , 1997, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  Probabilities and statistics on Riemannian manifolds: Basic tools for geometric measurements , 1999, NSIP.